As gun violence has been plaguing the United States of America for a number of decades, causing mass shootings and unwanted deaths, it is not surprised that more than 100 million handguns are owned in America for protection (Kates & Mauser, 2007). To prevent the future generation from being a victim to gun violence, some suggests that they should be allowed to carry firearms on campus for self-defence. This essay is against the opinion of permitting students from carrying weapons to school regardless the advantages it might bring. This is because teenagers have yet to fully reach maturity, teenagers armed are seen as a threat to others and lack of training in handling firearms. One of the reasons to prevent students from carrying guns is the fear of misusing firearms. High schoolers are often in the age of 14 to 18, where they are still, by …show more content…
Jacobs (as cited by Davidson, 2015) states that assault weapons are less deadly than non-assault weapons but it serves as a protection when one’s safety is threatened. However, with the lack of knowledge on how to use a gun, students might be killed when they come face to face with a potential killer, contradicting the purpose of permitting students to carry guns to school. Besides getting killed, there is also a chance that students might kill someone if they mishandled their weapons. A faulty press of the trigger can cause unwanted casualties on campus, resulting in people getting hurt or in worse cases, killed. Proponents of allowing teenagers to carry guns believe that when provided with training, this concern can be resolved but even best-trained police force will sometimes miss their shot despite practicing for years due to a multitude of potential risks during a crossfire, let alone high school teens. In view of the above, it is evident that teenagers with guns does not guarantee their safety in