ipl-logo

Should The Federal Government Conserve The Environment

616 Words3 Pages

There has been a lot of concern of whether the federal government should concentrate more on preserving or conserving the nature. Even though preserving the environment less harms the nature, conserving happen for both people and the nature to benefit. Preserving will save more nature, but it will be a big challenge for the humans to afford that money just for the environment. For both nature and humans to benefit the federal government should focus towards the conservation. Federal government who has the money and the power should have the responsibility to conserve the nature for the present and the future of the world. Local governments do not have the financial support to conserve the environment because they have other jobs they need to concern about for their people. Instead of pressuring the local governments to do the …show more content…

O'Shaughnessy Dam (dam in California) shows that preserving the nature is already late. Muir is one of the men that went against the dam. Even though a lot of people agreed to him, millions of people in California right now are benefiting from the electricity that is made from O'Shaughnessy Dam. In order for the government to preserve the nature, they need to destroy the dam, but that will affect millions of people in California. Not only that, pipes through the Alaska forest also has been a problem because of all the leaks from the pipes release chemical substances to the nature. However, government cannot destroy the pipes because those thirty thousands pipes bring oil to the city in Alaska and provides the people with it. Destroying those pipes will lead to a huge chaos in Alaska because there will be no oil in the city. From these reasons, the federal government cannot work on persevering the nature. However, instead of giving up they can at least try conserving the nature and make a better

Show More
Related
167 Words | 1 Pages

On March 12, 1928, the San Francis Dam (made by William Mulholland) collapsed 12 hours after he and his assistant gave it a safety inspection. The broken dam caused about 450 people to be killed. This was the cause of William Mulholland 's horrible reputation. His career came to an end and he lost everyone 's high respect. Some of the people even wanted him to die because he was the cause of them losing some of their family members.

Read More
613 Words | 3 Pages

The underlying reasons for the belief, impression or thought that the US gov-ernment must continue to fund national parks is often overlooked, misunder-stood or unheeded. In his essay, “Government Must Preserve National Parks.” Author Todd Da-vidson builds a cogent, detailed and absorbing argument by employing a varie-ty of rhetorical techniques and persuasive strategies, most notably, an array of pertinent facts and statistics, appeal to emotions, and a logical argument to persuade his audience that the US government must continue to fund national parks.

Read More
615 Words | 3 Pages

We aren’t going to solve our water problems until we begin building more dams. We can’t build more dams as long as the radical environmental laws make their construction impossible”(McClintock). That is, McClintock considers that the drought is still occurring because laws are making construction to save water invalid. To put it briefly, McEwen’s concern is similar to concerns of other in

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

The government has passed many conservation policies to protect animals, eco-systems, plants and trees itself and indigenous people’s way of life, but many of these policies get overlooked and require a lot of extra work. How it affects the rest of the world- This action is permanent, and all of the world is targeted as a potential setting for deforestation. It is predicted that the continuing action may result in very few rainforest across the entire globe. Cutting trees can also be harmful to our ozone layer, which protects earth from dangerous radiation.

Read More
579 Words | 3 Pages

This paper has great ethos, it gives an example of what is to come if we do not care for our environment and people. The paper states, “Once the battle is lost...man can not wonder at nature; his spirit will wither and his sustenance be wasted” (Lyndon B. Johnson).

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

President Theodore Roosevelt, the 26th President of the United States, was known for his love of nature. This was conveyed most strongly in his speeches, such as “Conservation as a National Duty”, in which he advocated for the preservation of natural resources in the interests of the nation and its people. In this speech as well as others he gave during his term as President, he stressed that conservation did not just pertain to preserving natural resources or deferring their exhaustion; rather, it was closely intertwined with the patriotic duty of ensuring that the nation would be able to provide for future generations, and was second only to the “great fundamental questions of morality”. One such example of how Roosevelt connected conservation with morality is found in his “The New Nationalism” speech, given in Osawatomie, Kansas in 1910. Here, he compares the way he believes the nation must behave in terms of conservation to the manner in which a farmer acts in reference to his children and the land that provides for them.

Read More
497 Words | 2 Pages

The Hetch Hetchy Project controversy brought into sharp relief the difference between conservation and preservation. The area where the Hetch Hetchy project was to take place was an established part of a national park and therefore off limits for human use. John Muir believed that nature was an example of the power of god and creation, and that the use of nature through management was an act of defamation. Muir believed that wilderness needed to be preserved from use by humans and that management would destroy it. Subsequently, the proposal to create a water source on a piece of national park land was the first step toward the destruction of all wild places protected by the national parks.

Read More
1621 Words | 7 Pages

Phelan also thought that damming Hetchy Hetchy was the only way to stop “monopoly and microbes” (Carlsson). The Federal Right of Way Act of 1901 also provided the legal basis for cities to acquire rights to national parkland, continuing Phelan’s point. However, in January 1910, the city held a vote where voters approved of a $45 million bond to build the Hetch Hetchy but rejected a $35 million bond to buy out the nearby Spring Valley Water Company’s facilities (Carlsson). This point gave the basis for John Muir’s argument saying that Hetch Hetchy should be preserved for its natural beauty. City lobbyists and engineers also argued for public use of Hetch Hetchy but argued for a grand water and power system to provide energy and water to San Francisco (Carlsson).

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

Theodore Roosevelt: “Conservation As A National Duty” introduces the problem of the lack of natural resources, and how are we going to fix the problem for future generations? Roosevelt makes connection between conservation and progress,patriotism,and morality of the American people by putting different people since or point of view of other people and himself to not waste our natural resources. He uses other people 's point of view by asking and using other people 's feeling about the crisis that they are in the middle of right now. (Stated in paragraph 3) “so vital is this question,that for the first time in our history the chief executive officers of the states separately,and of the states together forming the nations,have have met to consider.

Read More
278 Words | 2 Pages

The one of the current trend in the United States in to save the environment. Which the national parks, plays a huge factor in restoring and preserving native lands. Research from Pew Research Center shows that 74% of Americans believe that the country should do whatever it can to protect the environment. And 55% of American rank the environment as the top policy issue that President Trump and Congress should deal address.

Read More
1063 Words | 5 Pages

“A concern of many people is that house prices in the National Park are unaffordable and that National Park status would make it harder for young people to own a house in the area”, says friendsofthelakedistrict.com website claiming that national parks are not necessary for our climate. Although some people think the national park is not important, it is, because parks and public lands serve an essential role in preserving natural resources and wildlife, It is important, because in this article “ parks and public lands serve an essential role in preserving natural resources and wildlife habitats, protecting clean water and clean air, and providing open space for current and future generations” (“Role of Parks and Recreation in Conservation”). This quote is explaining how parks play a role in wildlife by providing clean water and air for everyone including the animals. Also, “The Park Service has

Read More
467 Words | 2 Pages

There has been a shortage of our natural resources because of how we take our resources for granted. In the early ages people had a surplus amount of resources. That was because they didn’t use the resources for things like phones, but instead our generation uses our resources for useless things such as hover-boards. If we as American citizens aren’t careful we could lead our nation into exhaustion. When we are using our resources we aren’t noticing the damage it is doing to our nation.

Read More
1214 Words | 5 Pages

TAPS transports 17% of the United State’s domestic petroleum. If the pipeline were to stop, “A loss of that production would increase prices by at least 10 to 16 percent” (Balan). This is very important, as the majority of the American population is in constant need of these resources. A shift this dramatic in the economy would lead to outrage and possible changes in economic inflation. All in all, the Trans Alaska pipeline has provided for a great number of people and has not failed to let them down.

Read More
395 Words | 2 Pages

In the smoky mountains there is a lot of bad air pollution because of power plants and industrial emissions are blowing bad air to the park and because of it there is wildlife that is being affected more than it should be. A lot of things are changing from air pollution, climate change, water issues, and foreign invaders that want to take things from the park not knowing if it will affect it or not. National parks are sites that should be protected.

Read More
1316 Words | 6 Pages

Our earth’s natural resources are rapidly dwindling and our environment is being increasingly degraded by human activities, it is evident that something needs to be done. We often feel that managing all this something that the government should

Read More

More about Should The Federal Government Conserve The Environment

Related Topics

Open Document