ipl-logo

Should The Pledge Of Allegiance Be Mandatory

481 Words2 Pages

The Pledge of Allegiance has been a national tradition to recite in America since it was first invented in 1892. In just a few small sentences, Americans have recited this short poem in baseball games, schools, and even small or large conferences. However, there is one controversy that has been fought that is based on the national poem. The original pledge was shorter than what most American's know today. The original pledge did not have the part “Under God” in its passages and has become a controversial topic for a long time. The original had only said “one Nation indivisible” while today's says “One nation, under God, indivisible.” The argumentative topic is that these two short words should not be required to say in the Pledge of Allegiance and that the short passage should go back to being the original. …show more content…

He stated, “In this way, we are affirming the transcendence of religious faith in America's heritage and future.” In this way he is reassuring that America is religious even though not every American shares the same faith or religion. A lot of other American's do not even have a religion. The essay, Why the Pledge of Allegiance Should Be Revised also states that around 70-80% of Americans state that they are part of a form of Christianity. This is not the only piece of American culture that is controversial among its

Open Document