The North and the South had different economies due to the region that they were in. The ways that they worked were also different because of the terrain and the supplies/resources that were found in the area. In the North, the work was mostly based on manufacturing and factory work. Since the South is closer to the equator, farming was ideal in the South. They also required slavery in the South for plantations. Based on the documents shown above, the difference is apparent in the way that the South and North had created sectionalism from the ways they worked and how they used slavery. In the second image, it showed how there were not only many slaves/laborers, but the land was clear and ideal for farming. It didn't have many buildings and …show more content…
Using tariffs would create more products and distribute more. The U.S. price would be lower than Europe including the tariff so it made more money for the Americans in the north. In the South, they did not believe in using factories (Since their land is good for farming and agriculture, that was their method.) The tariff that helped the North made the South suffer so they were already upset at the North and the federal government. The South mostly made cash crops, but during this time period, the most prosperous was cotton. With cotton, you could make clothing. At this time, The North and The South made a compromise where the South would grow the cotton and ship it to the North to sell. The South used the slaves to pick out the cotton seeds – it was a tedious job. In the last document, it shows a statistic of the profits made in the United States based on manufacturing. Comparing states such as New York to Florida, the difference is apparent. Counting by millions, New York makes $378.9 while Florida makes $2.4. The difference is that based on the climate of each region, the priority of work is different. Since down in the South had tropical areas, it is ideal to plant things there and have them sold in the North, where they could manufacture the goods and sell them at a price higher than foreign