While Chief Tecumseh and Chief Seattle come from different tribes, they both voice their fears and beliefs about the treatment they have suffered from the U.S. government. According to Chief Tecumseh “The way, the only way to stop this evil, is for the red people to unite in claiming a common and equal right in the land, as it was at first, and should be now -- for it was never divided, but belongs to all.” He uses ethos to convince people of his credibility to make them believe this will be the answer to end all this. He use ethos during “The way, the only way to stop this evil” making it seem as this must be the only way to peace. While Chief Tecumseh is trying to convince General William Henry Harrison throughout the whole speech to have …show more content…
The speech was written around 1810, and Chief Tecumseh was trying to get their land back, and the stop conflicts between tribes through emotional appeal, and ethos. He tried to show them that they were not savages, and they’re able to fix all the problems they caused. While in Chief Seattle “ A Letter To President Pierce” he said “We know that the white man does not understand our ways. One portion of land is the same to him as the next, for he is a stranger who comes in the night and takes from the land whatever he needs.”. In this quote he uses a metaphor comparing the white man to a thief, to show how to them the land is just a thing of value not importance. Unlike the speech Chief Tecumseh,who throughout the entire speech tried to make him feel mercy, and see he is right, the letter that was sent to President Pierce at 1855, used emotional appeal as well, but irony to poke fun at the idea that they are savages when the white man is doing all this. Chief Seattle hoped this would open his eyes, and change his ways by appealing to his emotional side, and to show how they were not