I chose Walgreens, Kroger, and Walmart for my grocery stores visits. There are obvious differences in each store. The major different in each store are the pricing and the layout of each store. The marketing strategies for each grocery store are similar but not exactly alike. Walmart is a superstore the store offers everything from a wide arrangement of items the household, garden, auto, electronics and beauty.
This is because Coles is one of the largest and leading food retailers in Australia, which makes new entrant of the food retail industry hard to ncompete with a supermarket like Coles. Also, the threatening combination of domestic zoning regulations and leasing conditions with landlords has caused an induced deprivation of grocery shopping sites. This has prevented numerous businesses from expanding into the market, especially international organizations whom are interested in entering the Australian grocery industry. If there were possibilities that new organizations are able to enter the Australian grocery market, they would have to compete with Coles. The organizations must be able to pull off economics of scale, massive investment in infrastructure and facilities and with the skills to
Q1a. MARKET STRUCTURE OF APPLE INC Apple Inc. operates different types of market structure in terms of their different products. In the smart phone business, they happen to be one of the major players with their different models of the “iphone” which makes them operate in an oligopolistic market. Oligopoly arises when there is an imperfect competition in which there are just few firms producing similar products. As a result of high competition, monopolies, interdependence among firms there are just a few big players having the market power and making it very difficult for new firms to penetrate the market with their products.
In all Trader Joe’s is one of the leading super markets in the U.S., but after careful analysis of their operations I believe there are opportunities that are currently being ignored by the company. The company doesn’t need to act on all the recommendations that I made, however it would be in their best interest to do so. Not only would the company grow at a faster pace, but it will make strides in areas that haven’t been occupied before. Despite these current pitfalls, Trader Joe’s still is a popular option in their
Market Structure - Oligopoly Oligopoly is a market structure whereby a few number of firms owns a lion’s share in the market. This market structure is similar to monopoly, except that instead of one firm, two or more firms have control in the market. In an oligopoly, there are no upper limits to the number of firms, but the number must be nadir enough that the operations of one firm remarkably influence and affects the others (Investopedia, 2003). The Walt Disney Company is categorized under an oligopoly market structure.
Although the Loblaw has majority market share holds, the company faces intense competition from many types of grocers such as Sobeys Inc., Metro Inc., Walmart; and many types of non-traditional competitors, such as drug stores, warehouse clubs and specialty stores (organics & ethnics). High rivalry intensity makes an industry more competitive and potentially decrease profit margins. Entry Barriers: As there are fierce rivalry between competitors, the barriers to entry in the Canadian grocery market is high. The large food retailers account for the majority of the market revenue in Canada. Thus, smaller interdependent retailers can’t really compete with such-alike Loblaw or Sobeys or Walmart.
In order to analyse what extent Tesco U.K’s performance is attributa-ble towards industry characteristics, Porter’s five forces are broken up into competition, potential of new entrants, power of suppliers, power of customers and the threat of sub-stitute products. Below is an image of Porters 5-forces in relation to the U.K supermarket industry. 1. Rivalry amongst competitors The intensive rivalry in the U.K’s grocery sector is remarkably high.
Porter’s Five Forces Porter’s Five Forces framework is to identify the level of competition within the industry and to determine the strengths or weaknesses which can utilise to strengthen the position. The framework consist of five elements: threat of entry, bargaining power of supplier, bargaining power of buyer, threat of substitutes and industry rivalry. Forces Analysis Implication Threat of new entrant Low Threat Diversified of product There are high demand of furniture and electrical appliance.
Without competition, companies would not have the need to adjust their prices, or improve their products to win over customers, resulting in low quality goods & services with high prices. Competition generally has a positive impact on the consumers, as when companies begin to strive to be the best and most successful in their industry, they utilise marketing strategies to win over customers, these include but are not limited to price, product, promotion and place. Two companies which are continually constructing innovative ideas to come out on top are PepsiCo and Coca-Cola. These two companies hold the majority of the market power in the non-alcoholic beverage industry. They are classified as an oligopoly concentration as the two firms control the vast majority of the market share and therefore requires the two companies to compete on prices as well as non-price related aspects.
Some are high number of firms and low switching of costs, both are strongly affected forces on competitive rivalry of Unilever. In such a big market, it’s very easy for a customer to switch to other brand. For that purpose low switching of prices have a very strong effect on their market value. Thus, in the case of Unilever the competitive rivalry is strongly
The oligopoly market is set up in a way so that competitors can survive because each is unique and there are so few competitors that they are virtually indispensable even if some ethics atrocity
Hence we assume this to be a situation of duopoly. The 2 companies sell products which are very close substitutes and are constantly fighting for greater market share. A person may buy a Coke product instead of a Pepsi one, and vice versa. The objective of both is to maximize their profit.
The product “The products that The Coca-Cola Company sells are called nonalcoholic beverages which include numerous nonalcoholic sparkling beverages; various water products, including packaged, flavored and enhanced waters; juices and nectars; fruit drinks and dilutables (including syrups and powdered drinks); coffees and teas; energy and sports and other performance-enhancing drinks; dairy-based drinks; functional beverages; and various other nonalcoholic beverages. These competitive beverages are sold to consumers in both ready-to-drink and other than ready-to-drink form.” (Coca-Cola Company 10-K 2015) (4) The competition market The Coca-Cola Company Competes in the non-alcoholic beverages part of the commercial beverages industry.
They are differentiated by their products such as soft drinks and soap powder. There also exist little firms who produce similar products such as petrol. However, in oligopoly, there are barriers to enter the market. Similar to monopoly, the barriers are no different, and it differs from one industry to the other. This is why the firms in oligopoly are interdependent with each other, because the firms all have large market shares and each of their actions would affect the rest, so any decision-making will be based on their competitors’ reactions.
The other factors that influence the firm behaviour under a market structure are the efficiency. Firm will be more efficient in a competitive market while firms will be least efficient in a monopoly
