Similarities Between 'Consider The Lobster And Storytelling'

518 Words3 Pages

The Truth about what’s ethically and morally right

David Foster Wallace’s essay “Consider the Lobster” and Jonathan Foer pieces of “Storytelling” are two different texts that pose very significant issues, but are at the same time complicated and hard to address. The principle of ethics and morals of a person is mostly built upon and govern around things such as religion and society’s behavior. These are the ideologies that gets passed on from one generation to the next. These two texts are in tune or communicating with each other in regards to the question of moral and ethical issue that deters from an individual’s ideologies. Culture always plays an important role in both texts and is most likely where the questions and issues steer from. However, David Wallace and Jonathan Foer are communicating with different types of audiences. In the “Consider the lobster” Wallace audience are the Gourmet Magazine readers; which basically means the readers of the magazine read the articles for pleasure of the food and not necessarily for something else. This contradicts what Wallace is doing in his piece and instead he talks about the inhuman ways the lobsters are cooked. …show more content…

He chooses to write about an article that’s subjected to morality and ethics. He pays close attention to everything, such as highlight the huge promotion and attention of big name’s attendances these festivities gather every summer. In addition to introducing us the kind of class that gathers for these festivities, he also introducers the main subject which is the lobster in such a way that gives it life and characteristic in a brief historical and scientifically summary. An example from the text will be the first paragraph “…a lobster is a marine crustacean of the family Homaridae characterized by five pairs of jointed legs….” (p