In Elsie Hill and and Florence Kelley Debate the Equal Rights Amendments, depicted how the National Woman’s Party, formed during World War I to help secure the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment, which granted american women the right to vote. The Woman’s Party would form again to address the issue of the Equal Rights Amendment, which would guarantee equal rights for women. The Amendment would pose many arguments among women due to the fact that women would also be losing some essential rights such as their wages, alimony, and child support in the case of divorce. Elsie Hill and Florence Kelley are two important women who debate over the Equal Rights Amendment concept of women’s freedom and their role within society. Whereas, in other documents …show more content…
Elise Hill, represented the National Woman’s Party, strongly believed securing the freedom of women and feared that if the new amendment were adopted then everything that woman had gain “...would remove them at one stroke” (VOICE OF FREEDOM 156). Florence Kelley, the head of the National Consumers’ League, suggested that women need special protection by the government. She proposed that “women will always need many different from those needed by men” (VOICE OF FREEDOM 156). Both of these position demonstrates how the full equality of women would overturn the economic security and legal protection of mothers and wives. However, there were some women who believed that gaining political equality was enough therefore, women no longer needed special legal protection. According to the textbook Give me Liberty, women such as Alice Paul, who support the new Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) believed the ERA “followed logically from winning the right to vote(GIVE ME LIBERTY 777).” Paul believed that women need to focus more on attaining equal access to employment, education, and all the other opportunities of