There are contrasts that are found in the Epic of Gilgamesh and the Tale of Sinuhe. Initially, the Epic of Gilgamesh is Babylonian Tale while the other one is an Egyptian tale. The main characters in these stories also portray unmistakable behaviors. Gilgamesh has supernatural characteristics that make him appear as a god. On the contrary side of Sinuhe, he is just a normal human being with military techniques. Gilgamesh is from every angle focusing on fantasy rather than focusing on reality. He battles to search for human immortality without succeeding. He imagines that his powers would make him bring life back with his companion. Sinuhe fears death, and that is the reason he escapes to Egypt because he is afraid of being defeated and killed by …show more content…
This juxtaposition between the material wealth and social position gained while abroad and Sinuhe's aching for the Egyptian palace marks the major defining moment of the narrative. Sinuhe comes to realize that all that he has acquired abroad is pointless when he compares it to his life in Egypt. All of these accomplishments are vacant: Ammunenshi has failed by one means or another in his emblematic capacity as a pharaoh. It isn't his political power or even his nation that is discovered lacking; Ammunenshi is essentially not able to meet Sinuhe’s religious and funerary needs. The Tale of Sinuhe reveals pressure, at least among the Egyptian elites, between the impression of their Eastern neighbors as being unfriendly adversaries to arrange, and as normal, albeit not Egyptian, individuals. The author of this content is clearly encouraging any future wanderers to stay in Egypt, or possibly to come back to Egypt before winding up too profoundly integrated into an outside society, warning of the dangers of biting the dust