Throughout history, the human form has been interpreted in a variety of ways. Each cultural time period portrayed their views of the human body using diverse methods to create their art. The Egyptian sculpture, Isis and the Infant Horus, and Anthony Conova’s sculpture, The Athlete Kreugas, were made nearly two thousand years apart. Although both sculptures are beautifully crafted, there are contrasting characteristics of each that allow the pieces to show their uniqueness. The Egyptian sculpture, Isis and the Infant Horus, is a bronze sculpture portraying a woman holding a child. This sculpture depicts an image of perfection by using an idealistic style. Isis’s body appears to be very symmetric, apart from her hand placement. She is also …show more content…
In the Isis and the Infant Horus sculpture, the entire composition is very precise and looks mathematical. The symmetry suggests idealism, creating an image of Isis’s perfection. In The Athlete Kreugas sculpture, Kreugas is portrayed in a more naturalistic manner. He is in an asymmetrical stance that shows movement of the human form, contrary to Isis’s seated position that renders idleness. Upon closer examination, there are few lines to contour Isis’s body, furthering the idealistic style the Ancient Egyptians used. Unlike the perfection depicted by the Egyptians, there are more realistic characteristics portrayed in The Athlete Kreugas. The muscles are more defined and parts of the body are more prominent based on how the light is radiating. Kreugas is also displaying an intense facial expression whereas the expression on Isis’s face is much more emotionless. A hieratic scale is represented in Isis and the Infant Horus through the use of the throne she is seated on and by the headdress she is wearing. The Athlete Kreugas is much more humanized, standing on a flat platform in a preparative fighting