Nat Turner and George Fitzhugh clearly wouldn't agree on much.
• What types of sources and information does each man rely on to justify his attitude about slavery?
It appears that Nat Turner uses the Bible and visions from the holy spirt he gets to justify his actions and attitude.
George Fitzhugh uses statistics from France, England, and American about crime rates and slavery to justify his attitude towards slavery. He also uses Rome and Greece as examples.
• Consider our ongoing discussion about American liberty and its meaning-- how would Turner define liberty? What about Fitzhugh? Do these men see liberty as a right or a privilege?
Turner appears to consider liberty as a right. Turner appears to define liberty as a God given right.
Fitzhugh says that liberty and equality are an “ experiment has already failed… we have conclusive proof that liberty and equality have not conduced to enhance the comfort or the happiness of the people. Crime and pauperism have increased. Riots, trades
…show more content…
Nor is there a war between master and slave. The masters interest prevents his reducing the slaves allowance or wages in infancy or sickness, for he might lose the slave by so doing. His feeling for his slave never permits him to stint him in old age. The slaves are all well fed, well clad, have plenty of fuel, and are happy. They have no dread of the future no fear of want. A state of dependence is the only condition in which reciprocal affection can exist among human beings the only situation in which the war of competition ceases, and peace, amity and good will arise” (Fitzhugh). In this passage it says that slaves will be happy and treated well. However, as history tells us from before this time period and now. This was simply not the case as most slaves were treated poorly and were not happy with their