Similarities Between Rosencrantz And Guildenstern

391 Words2 Pages

In Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead the format, although the still poetic is wrote in more of a paragraph form. Unlike in Hamlet, where the poetic words are written in stanzas. Both plays compare existentialism in different ways. Each also applies death to life and if fear of it is relevant. Hamlet breaks the fourth wall the same as Guildenstern when discussing the meaning of life and effects of death and the meaning of death and effects of life. Each is written with a unique syntax based on the character. Guildenstern speaks like a walking essay, using and quoting references to defend his feeling of life versus death and the fear they both carry. Hamlet however speaks like a poem, and is written in stanzas so that the reader and the audience hear the words that way. He also possesses a rhyme scheme; A,B,C,B, D,E,F,G, H,IH,I, J,K,J,K. Unlike Guildenstern, Hamlet doesn’t do a great job of convincing the audience, instead the audience pities him. The one element that Hamlet possesses more than Guildenstern is imagery …show more content…

Whereas Guildenstern seems religious, because of the time period, but believes that the universe is governed by fate, think of the ‘heads’ game he plays with Rosencrantz, it’s all based on fate. Each character uses soliloquies to find their meaning of life or death and what that means. Hamlet doesn 't not fear death but he is ready to “...play this role.” meaning the role to die. Guildenstern doesn’t fear death at all and looks to Socrates philosophy of death for a deeper meaning behind the fear of it so many have, “..since we don’t know what death is, it is illogical to fear it.” Both Guildenstern and Hamlet break the fourth wall to address the audience about death and while they speak with different patterns and for one the audience feels pity and for the other the audience feels persuaded, neither is afraid of