ipl-logo

Causes And Flaws Of The Articles Of Confederation

310 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Compare the articles of confederation with the constitution

The Constitution was a document that was written by our Founding Fathers. It defines what our government is and what it does. It is the basic blueprint for all the laws in the country and it provides the three branches of the U.S government the power it needs to rule this nation effectively. But the Constitution wasn’t always how it is now, it used to be called the Articles of Confederation and it had many problems that are no longer present in our current Constitution. All of the issues in the Articles of Confederation were resolved in the Constitution. For example, under the Articles of Confederation, Congress had zero power to tax, regulate trade between the states or enforce laws. This problem was fixed in the Constitution because it had the U. S ruled by a strong central government that could tax, regulate trade and enforce laws. The Articles of Confederation also had many weaknesses like having no national army or currency. This was fixed by the Constitution because now, there is a national army and a national currency (dollars). The last difference/problem was that the government previously had no Legislative branch, Executive branch and no national court system. Now there is a supreme court (Judicial branch), a president (Executive branch) and two houses of Congress (Legislative branch). …show more content…

Some similarities that the two documents share is the fact that both documents granted Congress the power to declare war and make treaties. In addition, the documents allowed the government to coin and borrow money. Laws could also be made under the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution. So in conclusion, even though both documents had some similarities and differences, both helped to shape our current government in different

Show More
Related
200 Words | 1 Pages

Constitution vs. Articles of Confederation Comparing the Constitution to the Articles of Confederation is really easy. To start off with the articles didn’t have executive branch, meaning no president. The Constitution has a executive branch, and introduced the legislative and judicial branches. National debt was a big threat after the revolutionary war, during the article period it wasn’t payed well, until the constitution the federal government helped pay the national debt, by passing taxes. The voting process was also introduced in the Constitution, compared to the articles the states vote in secret forms.

Read More
506 Words | 3 Pages

Written in 1787 and established in 1788, The Constitution is one of the most famous government systems in the world, laying down the foundation for the world we know today. It’s predecessor, the Articles of Confederation, was not nearly as long-lasting, being scrapped after just 10 years. However, both documents had a similar idea: giving power to the people and preventing the rise of a king. One huge difference is that the Constitution established a much stronger government than the Articles of Confederation. With the Articles, there was almost no government, leading to big problems.

Read More
263 Words | 2 Pages

As it applies to the Articles of Confederation there were many weaknesses in the way it went about governing the United States. For one, the loose federation of the states was too weak to act as a foundation to be considered or act as a central government. In addition the state legislatures had too much power and in turn had the ability to influence economic issues of all kinds. This strong legislature is the same one that allowed for mob ruling and actions by debtors. The Articles of confederation were also weak because the required congress to have all 13 colonies in agreement when a new tax was to be passed.

Read More
985 Words | 4 Pages

But beyond these general features, the two constitutions could not be more different. These differences result from the fact that the two documents arose out of very different historical circumstances and for radically opposite complaints with the document each was meant to replace. With the U.S. Constitution, the problem with the earlier Articles of Confederation was that government was too decentralized and not powerful enough. The U.S. Constitution was designed to overcome these weaknesses and offer a degree of centralization and increased government power.

Read More
586 Words | 3 Pages

Anna Lahair Mr. Mingace 8th Grade Civics 26 February 2023 The Strengths and Weakness’ of the Articles of Confederation Making a new government is hard. The makers of the Articles of Confederation created a more fragile government because they did not want an overpowering government but, they may have left out necessities for running a government. The articles of confederation were made in Philadelphia in 1777 to be a national government for the new States.

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

The new government, the Constitution, is now able to enforces taxes, which allowed money to come in and the government was able to pay off their debt. One other weakness of the articles was that it gave all power to only one house of representative from each state, the constitution try to solve this matter that creating three separate branches of power, the Legislative branch, Executive branch, and the Judiciary branch, allowing the power to be more divided. Representation was another problem in under the Articles of Confederation because a big state like Massachusetts and a small state like New Jersey both have the same amount of representatives, the Constitution made a compromise by forming two house in Congress the Senate, where each state get equal representation, and the House of Representatives, where each state is represented by the population of the state. The Constitution also fixed the problem of passing a law; under the Articles of Confederation, laws can only be passed if 9 out of 13 representatives agrees on the law because of this not much laws were passed, now under the Constitution only 51 percent of the votes to pass the law. From this readers can infer that the Constitution fixed many of the defects in the Articles

Read More
792 Words | 4 Pages

The Articles of Confederation that governed the new nation after the revolution were notable for their unifying ability and land ordinances; however, they ultimately created more problems through inadequate taxation, their inability to pass laws, and an incapacitated central government.

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

The Constitution was the supreme law of the United States of America. The Constitution is the Supreme law of the United States. The main idea for the Constitution was to organize the U.S government, this was the foundatioin of how life would now “work”. It told everyone how things would happen, and how people would interact and cooperate. The Constitution was written by the Framers which was a group of men who came up with the initial idea of the

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

Can you see the difference? One difference I find unique is the division of powers across the executive branch within the government. The U.S. constitution doesn 't do this, they rely on the joint work of their executive branch to get

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

In one hand, the Articles of Confederation had a weak central government, differing form the strong central government in the Constitution. The Constitution’s government had a structure of three different branches; the legislative, executive, and judicial branch; unlike the Articles of Confederation that had no structure whatsoever. The Articles of Confederation had many problems like, the poor international trade, poor foreign relations and a weak economy in contrast to the Constitution that only had one problem, the struggle over the ratification. the Articles of Confederation achieved the Northwest Ordinance and the Northwest Territory and according to a history website, the Constitution achieved that we had a system of checks and balances, that we had a bill of rights, and, eventually, the survival of a bloody civil war intact. Lastly, the Constitution had three compromises: the Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise and the Slave Trade compromise.

Read More
542 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout history there have been links between the Iroquois constitution leading to the basis for the American Constitution. A constitution’s role is to help their country and benefit the people so things stay balanced and never lose control. As proof continues to build up, it shows that like the Iroquois the constitution holds several similar qualities on how to handle the economy and people. It has been thought, that the Iroquois have put the lining for the American guidelines. Though there are things that show to be the same, there are subtle differences that slip and show through.

Read More
1033 Words | 5 Pages

The most important difference between these documents was that the Articles of Confederation gave very little power to a central government and the Constitution created a strong central government. The Article of Confederation was written to unite states after the American Revolution. People had the fear of the government having too much power. This document established

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

Generally, an overarching national government is responsible for broader governance of larger territorial areas, while the smaller subdivisions, states, and cities govern the issues of local concern. It is controlled by two diffent branches so not one will not have all the powerIt splits the goverment so it has more opinions. It was federalism which means its a system of government. It seperates all the power so its not in one place. It also makes it to where there is laws.

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

The Articles of Confederation were a document seen as the “first” constitution of the United States. This document granted the new national government power to control the military, declare war, and create treaties between the states. However, the Articles had holes in it considering the government did not have the power to tax, create laws without at least nine states’ approval, or change the Articles of Confederation without a unanimous vote. This means that the country soon fell into debt and petty arguments between state, the new government had no control. It was time for a change.

Read More
823 Words | 4 Pages

Articles of Confederation vs. U.S. Constitution The Articles of the Confederation and the U.S. Constitution are two articles that where written and accepted by the United States as a foundation for their new government. They are both very important documents that have similarities and differences. Some of the main things the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution have in common is that they addressed the needs of its constituencies.

Read More

More about Causes And Flaws Of The Articles Of Confederation

Related Topics

Open Document