Have you ever wondered what life would be like without the Civil Rights Movement? The Civil Rights Movement was an impactful time for the United States of America. Many blacks and whites did not get along and struggled during the 1950-1960’s. Throughout this time in America there were two philosophies, MLK and Malcolm X’s. Malcolm X was a separatist and MLK was a dreamer. In my opinion, I think Malcolm X’s philosophy was better. He was a realist, a separatist who helped the economy, and he was a person who didn't judge others by their color of skin. Malcolm X was a realist. He was a person who accepts a situation as it is and is prepared to deal with it accordingly. In document K, it states that he doesn't favor violence but condoned if necessary. This means that Malcolm X never wanted to hurt anyone, but he believed that we should protect ourselves from racists or other conflicts. Another reason would be from document I, it addresses that communication from all sides of a story is key. This statement means that if you explain …show more content…
He was one of those people who supported the separation of a particular group of people from a larger body on the basis of ethnicity, religion, gender, or race. In document C, it states that Malcolm X wants white people to work among their own community and that working separately will actually be working together. This means that he never thought working together would ever accomplish much. He just thought by not working with our differences it might make less of a problem and help the economy. The second reason would come from document G, it explains that helping others in your community is best. This means that if you spend your money in a different community that neighborhood gets wealthier , as your own gets poorer. Malcolm X brought the communities together in peace to help make our economy better and he made less conflicts for opposite