ipl-logo

Slaughterhouse-Five By Kurt Vonnegut: A Literary Analysis

1849 Words8 Pages

Before taking this class I never thought how war can be so destructive. I understood that a lot of horrible things happen, innocent lives are taken away, homes are destroyed and people are left with nothing. But to actually sit down and look at horrific pictures from 100 years old, and looking at pictures from today’s world and realize it’s the same aftermath. The thought of war can just be scary overall. War is destructive, while its during and after, or even 30 years later. War is like a scar, once it cuts you, you will be scared forever, and every time you look at that scar it will remind you of how it happened. The photograph I chose to help me compare and contrast Kurt Vonnegut “Slaughterhouse-Five” is AP photojournalist Horst Faas, War …show more content…

But, maybe Billy wasn’t aware that he was actually affected by his experience in war, where he might be hallucinating the world of Tralfamadorians in order to escape a world destroyed by war. “Slaughterhouse-Five is like a puppet-show where we can see both the puppet (Billy Pilgrim) and the puppeteer (Kurt Vonnegut). If Billy is just a puppet, then that makes Kurt Vonnegut our protagonist.” (The Cambridge companion to war writing) Kurt Vonnegut also served in the war, and suffered from depression not only due to the war, which was the cherry to the ice cream, but also because his mother committed suicide, his sister died a day after her husband died. I feel Vonnegut wrote this book which actually represents his life in the real world. Billy was a character that represents him. “It is so short and jumbled and jangled, Sam, because there is nothing intelligent to say about a massacre. Everybody is supposed to be dead, to never say anything or want anything ever again. Everything is supposed to be very quiet after a massacre, and it’s always is, except for the birds. And what do the birds say? All there is to say about a massacre, things like “Poo-tee-weet?” I have told my sons that they are not under any circumstances to take part in massacres, and that the news of massacres of enemies is not to fill them with satisfaction or glee” (Vonnegut, pg.19) Vonnegut isn’t happy being involved with war because he believes it causes nothing but destruction. He also mentions how he didn’t want he’s children finding the enemies death satisfying because just the thought of death something horrifying you shouldn’t even wish it on your enemy. Not only does Kurt and other soldiers believe war is destructive but also, Stephen Crane who wrote “War is

Open Document