ipl-logo

Social Life In The South Between 1830 And 1860: A Comparative Analysis

516 Words3 Pages

The social life as it developed in the South between 1830 and 1860, was in stark contrast to the social development of the inhabitants of the North. As it stands, cotton was a guaranteed money crop, and many wealthy southerners fortunes relied upon it. However, just as southerners understood the lucrative value of cotton farming, they also understood the labor force that farming it would demand. Therefore, by utilizing slave labor, southerners secured their economy, and passionately defended their beliefs of racial superiority of the white race. Clearly, the dependence on cotton created two distinct social societies during this time period, Southern White Society and Slave Society.
In contrast to Northern society’s regional class distinctions, Southern society did not distinguish by region because there were little existences of major cities. However, Southern White society was distinguished by wealthy planters and yeoman farmers.
Wealthy planters “viewed themselves as paternalistic aristocrats managing preindustrial fiefdoms” (Schultz, K.M., 2013). Many planters shared this view because Cotton afforded wealthy planters an idyllic lifestyle. While they concerned themselves with involvement in national and international markets, wealthy planters also partook in lengthy vacations …show more content…

Although many yeoman farmers were self-sufficient, they lived with their families on small, less desirable plots of land. Also, unlike their white counterparts, most yeoman farmers did not concern themselves with the markets because of isolation, nor were they able to afford adequate schooling for their children as there were so few public schools available. Therefore, finding themselves uneducated, isolated, and ostracised by the wealthy, most yeoman farmers consumed themselves with the demands of farm living, culture, family region, and

Show More
Related

North Vs South Dbq Essay

581 Words | 3 Pages

In the late nineteenth century, the North and the South were sharply divided in terms of lifestyle, economical strengths and weaknesses, morals, and political viewpoints. There were many issues that were heatedly debated at the time; slavery, education, industrial expansion, and the rights of freed African Americans. The economy varied hugely depending on the region. In the North, factories fed the economy, and it was full of booming cities. The South however was dependent on "King Cotton," a crop which was almost entirely dependent on slave labor.

Read More

What Was The Southern Planter Elite And Its Impact On American Society And Politics

1027 Words | 5 Pages

As a result, the South was less urbanized than the North. Additionally, lack of trust for slave workers lead plantation owners to rely on older agricultural methods than using new technologies. These developments lead to a society in which classes were greatly divided and an increasingly small percentage of the population owned a large percentage of slaves. 3. While working for white, enslaved Africans created ties of family,

Read More

Similarities Between The North And South's Economy

655 Words | 3 Pages

However, the South’s economy was ingrained on cotton. The economic relationship between the North and South during this time was that the South produced cotton and the North used the cotton to manufacture textiles. As the textile mills in Great Britain and the northern United States thrived, cotton was high in demand. Plantation owners depended on the slaves to pick up the cotton and

Read More

Civil War Dbq Essay

847 Words | 4 Pages

The purpose of Document E is to illustrate how the cotton industry functions in a daily basis. Moreover, the print elucidates the tranquility and the normality of their economy and life on a Southern plantation filled with slaves and their

Read More

To What Extent Was The Era Of Good Feelings A Misnomer

885 Words | 4 Pages

As one of the most influential and successful inventions during the Industrial Revolution, cotton gins brought so many conveniences to the cotton industry, and cotton became one of the fastest way to achieve enrichment. The overweight cotton development made cotton became the only economic resource in the south. Cotton helped the South grow more prosperity in agriculture, but the South still had the industry lags, and even their succeed in agriculture could not save their lack of development in other areas. The southerners relied on the agriculture so much that they ignore the importance of other business. “King Cotton” built a safe disguise to the southerners, which encouraged them to keep using cotton gins to make money because cotton was so important.

Read More

Cotton Business In The Civil War

156 Words | 1 Pages

These essential records will endeavor to indicate how critical bondage and the cotton business intended toward the south amid the common war period. The cotton business in the United States was conceivable in view of the cotton gin. The cotton

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The American Civil War

1422 Words | 6 Pages

The demonstrations of division in America coexisted many: utopian societies, clashes over public space, backlash alongside immigrants, urban rebellions, black demonstration, and Indian oppositions. America was a separated land in need of change with the South in the biggest demand. The South trusted heavily on agriculture, equally opposed to the North, which was vastly populated and an industrialized union. The South produced cotton, which remained its main cash crop and countless Southerners knew that hefty reliance on slave labor would damage the South ultimately, but their forewarnings were not regarded. The South was constructed on a totalitarian system.

Read More

Poverty In The 1850's

100 Words | 1 Pages

If you were in poverty in the south it was very hard to get out of. Along with that they had no factories which contributed to people not being able to get out of poverty. Later on the south relied on the north and europe for many things such as borrowing money, farm tools and furniture. “ One southerner described the situation as a burial show to how the south depended on the north for so many goods in the 1850’s.” Most Southerners believed that if cotton remained king that their future for themselves and for their economy was

Read More

Social Myths Of The Old South

367 Words | 2 Pages

Cotton had become so useful that it had advanced some awful misperceptions in the late 1850s. The profit of having cotton made the southerners overconfident and aggressive. The heyday of the

Read More

What Was The Impact Of Slavery On The Old South

766 Words | 4 Pages

No matter your stance at the time, one thing became clear: socially, politically and economically, slavery was the fabric of American success and gave birth to the Old South as we know it today. At the center of the entire institution of slavery, and central to its defense, was the economic domination it provided a young country in international markets. In the early 19th century, cotton was a popular commodity and overtook sugar as the main crop produced by slave labor. The production of cotton became the nation’s top priority; America supplied ¾ of the cotton supply to the entire world.

Read More

Uncle Tom's Cabin By Harriet Beecher Stowe: Chapter Analysis

1406 Words | 6 Pages

Harriet Beecher Stowe's 19th century novel, Uncle Tom's Cabin, gives an unimaginable knowledge into slavery practiced throughout America during the Civil War era. During this time southerners used slave labor to produce crops, especially cotton, because after Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin cotton became king. Only a few Southerners actually had slaves and actually treated them like family. The other Southerners treated their slaves like dirt and worked them to death. Although slavery was illegal in the Northern states, only a few Northerners actively opposed it.

Read More

Southern Colonies Social Structure

613 Words | 3 Pages

People across the world immigrated to America in search of a new life free from the oppression of the Old World and in pursuit of the promise of a bountiful future in America. These brave people came from vastly different races, cultures, and economic backgrounds which led to the unique development of the southern colonies social structure. The social structure of the south was comprised of three parts: the wealthy Great Planters, the diligent Yeoman farmers, and the daring Frontier Families. The Great Planters were the aristocratic landowners of the south who held the most political power and the top position of the social structure of the southern colonies.

Read More

Why Did The South Grow Essay

828 Words | 4 Pages

For example, small farmers depended on the local plantation aristocracy for access to cotton gins, markets for their modest crops and their livestock, and credit or other financial assistance in time of need. The great cotton economy allowed many small farmers to improve their economic fortunes. Some bought more land, some became slave owners, and some moved into the fringes of plantation society. A typical white southerner was a yeoman farmer, who was also known as “plain folk.” These farmers owned a few slaves, with whom they worked and lived more closely than the larger planters.

Read More

Essay On Slavery In The South

704 Words | 3 Pages

Imagine if the cotton businesses had no slaves the Southerners would have to create their own factories, for example, if they did have to create their own industry, they would have to sell all their slaves and that’s one of the last things that they wanted to do. If the South had no slaves, they would have to do everything all by themselves. According to page 242 it says " planters would have had to sell slaves to raise the money to build factories, most wealthy southerners had their wealth invested in land and slaves. Planters would have had to sell slaves to raise the money to build factories. Most wealthy southerners were unwilling to do this.

Read More

Slavery And Capitalism: An Economic Analysis

1009 Words | 5 Pages

One of the reasons American cotton was attractive in the market was its low prices, which was a consequence of the employment of slave labour. Here, the social relationships contributed significantly to the economic structure. Slave owners, who more often than not, were also plantation owners or landlords, exerted their dominance over slaves. The relationship between these two groups was one of violent domination. Cotton planters often used violent means to extract maximum possible labour from the slaves.

Read More

More about Social Life In The South Between 1830 And 1860: A Comparative Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document