Social Media Ethics

1358 Words6 Pages

Social Media
Introduction
Social media sites, comprising Facebook, LinkedIn, Myspace, Twitter, Plaxo, and others, have factually hundreds of millions of subscribers who use their facilities daily. These spots are used by businesses and private gatherings for commercial and personal drives. Usages vary, but comprise scenery up a profile page and posting personal information on one’s own site; by means of the facilities for their “chat rooms,” sometimes disguised; advocating a position on a substance of private or public interest; advertising; instant messaging; blogging; and more.
The extensive use of social media and the difference in practices among sites give rise to anxieties about the reliability of such indication. On February 10, 2011, …show more content…

Formal Opinion 462, date: February 21, 2013, and delivered by the ABA Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility, deliberates the issues that arise when a judge engages in social media. The view syllabus states: “A judge may participate in electronic social networking, but as with all social relationships and contacts, a judge must comply with relevant provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct and avoid any conduct that would undermine the judge’s independence, integrity, or impartiality, or create an appearance of impropriety.” The ABA’s Belief joins the numerous state judicial ethics optional opinions addressing alike social-media …show more content…

These sites deliver different resources such as email and prompt messages in one place. Obtainability of these resources makes the communication easy and sooner. When we look at the social influence of social networking sites, we find that these platforms have both positive and negative effects. Because of this detail, it is essential to analyze both advantage and problems of social networking sites.
Meanwhile the publication of the last CCPIO New Media Survey, courts have sustained to experiment with social media and other new media tools to attach with the public and achieve their obligation to be open, transparent, and understandable organizations. At the same time, lawyers, judges and courts have sustained to experience challenges in balancing new media use with protecting the honesty of proceedings, judicial morals, and other anxieties. The 2013 CCPIO New Media Survey paints a picture of a judicial scheme that is hopeful about the potential new media carries while cautiously guarding against the