New York Times Vs United States Essay

In the Supreme Court case New York Times v United States, a decision was made that shaped the future. New York Times v United States was a case based on the freedom of the press and the government’s ability to impose on those rights. In 1971, the US was faced with fear, fear for the future, and fear that loved ones would be drafted to fight for their country in Vietnam. As time passed, the contents of the war seemed minuscule, until the New York Times obtained and published classified government documents that exposed the truth behind the war. The argument that stood was that these documents revealed the true vulnerable nature of national security, causing extensive harm to the country as a whole. The New York Times soon became victorious over

From our televisions, computers, classrooms, and phones, we are surrounded. You either get with the program or get left behind. Along with these screens come social media platforms and search engines, creating an endless void of scrolling to find new stories. Freedom of the press is displayed every day through social media platforms, as civilians can create, share, and comment on the news. New York Times v the U.S. helped show that the first amendment was a clear distinction between the people’s freedom of speech and to act as the press and the government limitations. Since times have changed, and essentially everyone can become the “press” with one post, it’s important to know that some people’s thoughts have limitations if they go far, but others’ opinions remain

For example, 9/11 was a time of fear for our nation. As the news was flooded with headlines exclaiming “act of war”, “its war”, and “America’s darkest day” Americans let the news get to them. Journalism changed forever as its coverage became tied to emotions and political views. The question that stood is whether new companies were covering the news or just making news. Even though news companies are proven to be protected hence seen in New York times v the U.S. they do cause panic to many, as they use headlines to grasp the attention of viewers, a principle that has become more important than the actual coverage of a story. Specifically with 9/11 news coverage was affecting national security showing how and why the tragedy happened. The ruling in New York times v the U.S. played a huge hand in how news companies documented the events of