ipl-logo

Socrates Allegory Of The Tablets In Plato's The Republic

950 Words4 Pages

In The Republic, Plato presents a dialogue of Socrates, in which he seeks to uncover truths about what constitutes justice. Socrates proposes a way to examine these truths by looking at an ideal society, which he likened to a large tablet, and then comparing this to an individual person, which would be the small tablet. While superficially simplistic, Socrates’ analogy of the tablets provides a thorough and correct example of how the same measures of society can be used for an individual. The analogy of the tablets scales down what justice is in an ideal society to what justice is for an individual. The theory behind the analogy is that if a person cannot see something miniscule in something small something can something small in …show more content…

“When the State is completed there may be a hope that the object of our search will be more easily discovered”(221) It is this step that connects the ideas of the character of the state to the individual justice. For the large tablet in this analogy, Socrates and the rest of the interlocutors design an ideal state to elucidate what justice would be like. Socrates claims that people enter society because “no one is self-sufficing, but all of us have many wants” (222), and that each should do the work for which he is most gifted “there are diversities of natures among us which are adapted to different occupations”{222). Socrates lists the socio-economic classes: the first of the classes would be the ruling class, drawn from best of the guardians; the second class would be the guardian class in general, and the third would be the producer class. The guardian class would be the soldiers that would be in charge of protecting the wealth, valuables, and the city itself. “And the higher duties of the guardian, I said, the more time, and skill and art, and application will be needed by him? No doubt he replied. Will he not also require natural aptitude for his calling? Certainly.”. They would rule they city,

Show More
Related
342 Words | 2 Pages

the Republic, Socrates argues that justice ought to be valued both for its own sake and for the sake of its consequences (358a1–3). His interlocutors Glaucon and Adeimantus have reported a number of arguments to the effect that the value of justice lies purely in the rewards and reputation that are the usual consequence of being seen to be just, and have asked Socrates to say what justice is and to show that justice is always intrinsically better than is acting contrary to justice when doing so would win you more non-moral goods. Glaucon presents these arguments as renewing Thrasymachus’ Book 1 position that justice is “another’s good” (358b–c, cf. 343c), which Thrasymachus had associated with the claim that the rulers in any constitution frame

Read More
900 Words | 4 Pages

In this essay, two prominent voices are Socrates and Martin Luther King Jr. Socrates presents the law as a universal truth. King argues in his "Letter from Birmingham Jail" that we have a moral duty to disobey unjust laws occasionally. This essay will delve into

Read More
212 Words | 1 Pages

Youths should not be banned from participating in sports such as dodgeball, cheerleading, and football. To begin with, dodgeball teaches physical and mental education. According to the text, ”Rick Hanetho, founder of National Amatuer Dodgeball Association said,” It teaches hand-eye coordination, concentration, and to draw quick conclusions” (171). This proves that youths shouldn’t be banned from dodgeball since it teaches them at a young age and it teaches mental and physical lessons. As for cheerleading, youths shouldn’t be banned because the coaches are trained and certified.

Read More
1464 Words | 6 Pages

Both Martin Luther King Jr. and Socrates derive from two very distinct eras. Nonetheless, in the course of their lifetimes both encounter similar modes of injustice imposed onto them by their governing system. Be that as it may, when responding to these injustices both King and Socrates apply and possess their own unique theories of how a citizen must approach these circumstances. Therefore, when comparing Crito and “The Letter from a Birmingham Jail” one can note the ways in which Socrates’ and King’s notions of the obligations of a citizen differ.

Read More
732 Words | 3 Pages

Bothered by Socrates’ logic, Thrasymachus presents a revised version of his previous argument. Thrasymachus says that injustice is stronger than justice and that it most definitely results in a happier life. The example he uses (of a powerful dictator who is made happy through injustice is a reference to his earlier example that justice is used to the advantage of the stronger). Thrasymachus has not greatly changed the principle of his argument, just using alternate examples.

Read More
1434 Words | 6 Pages

Therefore, since Athens has a part to play in corrupting Socrates’s life as well as his mistaken visual of the truth, Socrates must understand that by obeying the state, he has done injustice to his soul for it will not be in true harmony. Furthermore he will be doing an injustice to the state because Plato would have established that, objectively, Athens laws are unjust and even if Socrates thinks that they are just, it is only because Socrates has been corrupted by

Read More
1382 Words | 6 Pages

Socrates believes that justice benefits the just, but also benefits the city (other people) too. He is faced with a seemingly simple choice, escape Athens or remain in prison and be sentenced to death. Socrates’ central argument against escaping his circumstances is twofold. First, Socrates argues that “one must never do wrong.” (49b)

Read More
1169 Words | 5 Pages

According to Socrates there are two types of justice, the political justice and the justice of a particular man. As we know, city is bigger than a man. Socrates believes that it is easier to find justice at the political level which means in the city, thus he tries to define a just city from scrap, and will see in which stage justice enters. Also, Socrates tries to find justice in the city before finding justice in the individuals because individuals are not at all self-sufficient. We humans have similar needs such as food, clothing and shelter and in order to accomplish these goals human beings form unions, where each and every individual specializes in a field.

Read More
763 Words | 4 Pages

In Plato’s The Republic” written in 380 BC, Plato introduces two characters Polemarchus and Thrasymachus who hold two separate opinions on Justice. They both are made to give their own opinions on Justice by Socrates. Both standpoints accurately represent Justice in sirtain situations. The word justice can be represented in many ways because it holds a broad meaning. They are covering two completely different aspects of Justice.

Read More
1082 Words | 5 Pages

The state achieves this by implementing laws which promote justice and virtue, by educating its people so that they may make better and more informed choices toward happiness, and by overall promoting the interests of the whole rather than that of any one individual. However, the just state may be impossible according to Plato and Aristotle, but this is not to say that we should give up entirely. Rather, we should make note of the just city and continuously aspire to that ultimate state of happiness, for the city that aspires toward justice, although imperfect, is the best possible condition we are capable of

Read More
1021 Words | 5 Pages

It is challenging to lead a private life while truly fighting for justice. A man can fight for justice through examining the greatest issues in human nature that Socrates found essential to the private life. However, this knowledge can have the biggest effect when brought into the public life such as through teachings. These two things can then combine to reflect how the state should be changed. Socrates sometimes crossed this line himself, even if unknowingly.

Read More
2004 Words | 9 Pages

The concept of the Noble Lie is presented by Plato in the Republic. In Republic, Plato is engaged in creating an ideal political community, through the noble lie. The Noble Lie, ironically, despite being a lie, is still recognized as ‘noble’ by Plato since it aims to promote social welfare and harmony amongst the citizens. Plato’s idea of the noble lie led to the division of citizens into three distinct categories, namely, the rulers, the auxiliaries and the workmen . This paper will argue that Socrates principle of the Noble Lie must be considered justifiable under circumstances in which it intends to achieve moral ends.

Read More
1071 Words | 5 Pages

Socrates provokes the ideas that the city has of him as an individual as to being a harmful human being and argues that it is not in human nature to go against his own

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

In Book IV of Plato’s Republic, Socrates and his peers come to the conclusion that a city is going to need people who have an understanding of what justice should be. Socrates at the end of Book IV can make the difference between individual, political, and social justice. He knows that individual and political justice is so much in common because they both weigh in heavy on truth, honor, and appetitive soul. That appetitive soul is an element that helps the secure the just community with love and support.

Read More
941 Words | 4 Pages

In “The Cask of Amontillado,” Edgar Allan Poe uses diction and irony to create a suspenseful and sinister mood to further keep his readers in a state of suspense. Throughout the story, it remains a mystery as to why the narrator has such hatred toward Fortunato. In the beginning of the story, Poe uses diction that appeals to the audience by including words relating to acts of revenge. “You, who so well know the nature of my soul, will not suppose, however, that I gave utterance to a threat.

Read More

More about Socrates Allegory Of The Tablets In Plato's The Republic

Related Topics

Open Document