ipl-logo

Sonnet 144 Figurative Language

554 Words3 Pages

I chose these two sonnets because of the way he uses references to the Gods . I think it’s interesting that he chose them to use as ways of explanation because of the time period that he was in when writing them . At that point in time, I don’t believe that they really believed in Gods so much as they believed in one singular God . At least in England I believe, the major religion was Christianity .
In sonnet number 144, he references an evil and a good spirit, which through my interpretation would be the ‘Gods’ . One being God himself, the other being Satan . One leading him one way, through a path of well being and good intentions . The other leading him down a path of darkness and despair . He knows that if they meet, they’ll either come together for good or evil, and that will decide his fate . At the end of the sonnet when he says “... Suspect I may, but not directly tell; But being both from me both to each friend, I guess one angel in another’s hell. Yet this shall I ne 'er know, but live in doubt, till my bad angel fires my good one out.”, I feel as though he means since the evil spirit has …show more content…

He says “...I grant I never saw a Goddess go; my mistress, when she walks, treads on the ground...” . Gods and Goddess’ were rumored to be able to fly and levitate, which is presumably quite graceful and pretty . Which is in contrast to treading the ground which is clumsy, loud and obnoxious . In the sonnet Shakespeare mostly has negative things to say about his mistress, saying her breath reeks, her hair is like black wire and she lacks color in her cheeks. I believe though, that even though he said some fairly unpleasant things, he did quite care about her . He says at the end, “...And yet, by heaven, I think my love is rare as any she belied with false compare.”. Meaning that even though she isn’t the prettiest, or the most hygienic, he still loves her very much

Open Document