Control over dangerous objects Miss Joker is an adult who has the full capacity to act, which entails that she has an ability of differentiating between what is right and wrong and she has an ability to choose to do the right thing. In this case Miss Joker had a control over the dangerous objects (switching off the sprinkler), but she did not control the sprinkler as she did not border herself to remove it from the field instead she asked learners to be careful, of which was impossible for the grade four learners to take care of themselves. Miss Joker should have switched off and remove the sprinkler from the ruby field or simple ask school caretakers to do so. Damage The important question to ask is: was there a damage after the incident? …show more content…
Only if Miss Joker has taken care of learners or supervised them when playing in ruby field there could be no damage, because Miss Joker would make an assurance that learners do not go or play near the sprinkler. The school as a whole supposed to make sure that the sprinkler is removed, they must promote and encourage the culture of safe environment so that learners will use the knowledge in their homes and use it in future for parenting …show more content…
If not the school could not even border to remove it, they would have let learners to take care of themselve around the sprinkler. Miss Joker saw that the sprinkler was not removed and she reasonably foresee the danger of the sprinkler to learners. That is why she warned learners to be careful when playing in the ruby field. Clearly Miss Joker has a workinng experience and important skills as she able to understand learners and what they could do and what can be dangerous to theit healthg and well