ipl-logo

Stamp Act: Similarities And Differences Between Patriot And Loyalists

548 Words3 Pages

Imagine, a new land across the sea found so people can get away from all their troubles and start a new life. Everyone get’s there is excited for their new life but come to see it’s exactly the the same but worse. A tyranny that’s being run into the ground by bad decisions and bad relations with other people will they realize they're issues before it’s to late or will the continent be saved by a different cause.When examining the events of Stamp Act, the similarities and differences between Patriot and Loyalists’ While both sides had their differences they all had common ground, they both shared the British tax system and laws. Whether the Loyalists agreed with the Parliament or the Patriots thought it was an imposition on their rights, …show more content…

According to Houghton Mifflin, James Otis argued that the power of the crown and Parliament was limited, “no person can take from any man any part of his property, without his consent in person or by representation” (Otis 99). Otis believed that the Stamp Act was a violation of the terms they set in the colonies. Although the Patriots did believe this and showed good evidence why the act was wrong for the British to do this, the Loyalist denied this statement and still believed that the British were paying off their debt in the French and Indian War. both sides had strong words and good statements, that wouldn’t stop them from disagreeing and not coming up with a reasonable resolution for both sides. Another difference within the Loyalists and the Patriots was they're different views on Britain's description of the preservation of america. According to A Letter to New York, “Preservation of America is of the utmost importance to Great Britain. A loss of it to the British crown would greatly diminish its strength” (Galloway 2). The Patriots just thought this was just a distraction to make the colonists think they were doing their job just so they could take over the

Show More
Related
212 Words | 1 Pages

After the French and Indian War, the British had a lot of debt that needed to be paid back. In order to do this, they put large amounts of taxes on the colonies, one of which was the Stamp Act. The Stamp Act was not justified because the colonists had no representation, and because it was not entirely spent on necessary things. First of all, the British levied taxes on the colonies without any discussion or compromising. This was extremely unfair to the, “American colonists who had no representation in Parliament”(Cummins 63).

Read More
256 Words | 2 Pages

It is clear the Loyalists won the debate. They all had ample support and logical explanations to support their evidence. The Loyalists were also able to deflect any of the Patriots’ arguments. For instance, the Patriots insisted that the soldiers in the Boston Massacre were at fault, and that even though the soldier who fired first misheard his captain command “fire,” he was still entirely to blame. The Loyalists argued that the soldiers did not have the initial intent to kill, therefore they could not be entirely at fault.

Read More
175 Words | 1 Pages

In 1765, the Stamp Act was placed on colonists, which placed a tax on many types of printed materials. As a result of the sudden tax placement, almost all of the free colonists were furious and began to riot. Groups such as the Loyal Nine opposed the Stamp Act and expressed their anger through violence. English colonists were determined to have freedom since they believed that the Stamp Act imposed by Great Britain “violated their liberty” (Foner, 179). The determination to achieve colonial liberty established a huge divide between the colonists and Great Britain.

Read More
386 Words | 2 Pages

The Declaration of Independence was a document that freed the colonies from Britain. After the French and Indian War the British put out a new control called the Proclamation Line of 1763. The Proclamation Line of 1763 didn 't allow the colonies from settling west from the Appalachian Mountains. Another act that King George III put into place is called the Stamp Act. The Stamp Act is a law that required that the colonists buy and place tax stamps on many kinds of documents.

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

Oppressive actions such as the Boston Massacre heavily shook the general public’s view of their British rulers. Unfair policies such as the Stamp Act, in which colonists were forced to pay taxes on almost all paper goods, further agitated unrest in the colonies. If it wasn’t for a mix of oppressive actions and overbearing policies, the Revolution likely would not have gained enough traction to sway the views of the general public, and likely Thomas Jefferson would not have had enough support to write the Declaration of Independence. Thomas Jefferson not only used the Declaration of Independence to announce the United States secession from the British Empire, but he also used it to express all of the injustices he saw against colonist’s natural

Read More
780 Words | 4 Pages

Along with the many colonists that wanted to see the colonies become separated from the mother country there were debaters. People that owed big money to Great Britain were patriots as if they became separated from the mother country the debtors hoped that all debt owed would be abolished. Also similarly to the loyalists the patriots were mainly from one spot, not to say there couldn’t be patriots in the southern colonies or vice versa, but many patriots came from the new england colonies such as Massachusetts, Rhode Island, etc… Document 4 was written by Thomas Paine, a very influential patriot who explained in his writing why the loyalist arguments were wrong or at least he thought so. According to paine Great Britain did not protect her colonies because her motive was centered around self interest and she wanted to protect Britain from her enemies to benefit those living in Britain. Paine also described Great Britain's behavior as savage and shameful as, ‘even brutes don’t devour their own and nor even do savages, make war upon their family.’

Read More
735 Words | 3 Pages

Imagine of your friend used you to copy off of your homework, and you feel like you are not getting anything in return. How would you feel? That is exactly how the colonists felt with Britain. The angry colonists wanted to start a revolution against Britain because their unalienable rights were being intruded in their own country. They were used to salutary neglect, but the tight control the British had over them angered the colonists.

Read More
1491 Words | 6 Pages

At the dawn of the 1770s, American colonial resentment of the British Parliament in London had been steadily increasing for some time. Retaliating in 1766, Parliament issued the Declaratory Act which repealed most taxes except issued a reinforcement of Parliament’s supremacy. In a fascinating exchange, we see that the Parliament identifies and responds to the colonists main claim; Parliament had no right to directly tax colonists who had no representation in Parliament itself. By asserting Parliamentary supremacy while simultaneously repealing the Stamp Act and scaling back the Sugar Act, Parliament essentially established the hill it would die on, that being its legitimacy. With the stage set for colonial conflict in the 1770s, all but one

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

Why In The Americas of 1775, You’d be Safer as a Loyalist At the point in which the Revolutionary War started in 1775 Americans compelled to decide weather they would support Britain and become a loyalist, or fight for there freedom as a Patriot. The loyalist, also known as Tories, supported the mother country whereas Patriots strongly resisted and past or present ties to Britain. For many of the colonist, the decision was not an easy one. There were numerous variables that were considered other than loyalty the monarch or ones freedom. When making this commitment, colonist pondered who's victory they'd benefit more from, the British or the colonies.

Read More
1112 Words | 5 Pages

They knew what they wanted and got it by making their own goods instead of relying on British or imported goods. This strike against British, in turn, caused people who disagreed with the colonists to feel embarrassed or ashamed. “‘In every colony, from Georgia to New Hampshire inclusively, the stamp distributors and inspectors have been compelled by the unconquerable rage of the people to renounce their offices. Such and so universal has been the resentment of the people, that every man who has dared to speak in the favor of the stamps, or to soften the detestation in which they are held … has been seen to sink into universal contempt and ignominy.’” This quote by John Adams in December of 1765 spoke the truth about the political consequences of the Stamp Ac.

Read More
511 Words | 3 Pages

This was known as the culper spy ring ran by George Washington, it was one of the ways they won the war. They also had help from the French who were former enemies of the British. The Patriots were much more motivated to fight then the British because the British were fighting for defense and to win, but the Patriots were fighting for independence to the whole nation. This was is very important because if it never happened then Great Britain would share America with American citizens and British would probably own most of the country.

Read More
1090 Words | 5 Pages

really wanted to gain independence from Great Britain. There were some people in the U.S. called loyalist that wanted to live under the tyranny of Great Britain and had no problems with the raising of taxes to support their country. The Patriots on the other hand were very much against all that the British stood for. The battle of Lexington and Concord, the battle of Trenton, and the battle of Yorktown were three key battles won by the U.S. that pushed the outcome of the war in the favor of the United States. The battle of Yorktown was the most significant it was the last major battle on land and with the surrender of Lord Charles Cornwallis it was very pivotal in the defeat of the British.

Read More
176 Words | 1 Pages

I feel that the way patriots treated the loyalists was cruel and unjust. In the beginning of the Americas, everyone living there followed the king and what he had to say and what he did. They were all British and proud of that. So even if some things went bad and not everybody agreed, the loyalists were still proud to be British, which isn’t a bad thing. The thing that is bad about this is how the people who were no longer wanting to be British treated the people who did.

Read More
766 Words | 4 Pages

Historical Perspective Dialogue Patriot: African American slave Loyalist: Colonial loyalist Setting: Boston,Massachusetts Topic 1: Boston Taxation( Stamp Act, Townshend Acts, and the Tea Act) Narrative: hello and welcome to our show thanks for tuning in. Tonight on the show will be seeing the African-American slave and colonial loyalist in Boston Massachusetts talk out and discuss events that led up to the separation of America and Britain.

Read More
52 Words | 1 Pages

The Patriots were not justified in using harsh measures against the Loyalists because many times they did not have evidence of treason, because many Loyalists did not yet want to choose to support the revolution, and because many Loyalists had good reasons for wanting the colonies to remain peaceful with the

Read More

More about Stamp Act: Similarities And Differences Between Patriot And Loyalists

Related Topics

Open Document