ipl-logo

Stephen G. Breyer's Influence On The Supreme Court

1113 Words5 Pages

Pragmatic. Moderate. Persevering. These are just some of the words that describe Justice Stephen G. Breyer, who, a few days before his meeting with the president, had gotten into a car accident with a punctured lung and broken ribs. After rushing out of the hospital to meet Bill Clinton, Breyer was appointed as a Justice on August 3rd, 1994 (Oyez). While being classified to the Liberal wing of the Supreme Court, Breyer is one of the more moderate judges, who could potentially become a swing-voter if the retirement of Justice Kennedy were to precede his. Justice Breyer, who has been serving just a bit over 23 years, has been involved in many landmark cases which have shown his continued ideals and ideas for as long as he’s been serving. Not …show more content…

Stephen Breyer’s presence on the Supreme Court is one of unpredictability in the upcoming years of administrations. Unfortunately, there is also a very real possibility of three Justices stepping down in coming years, due to the fact that all of them are approaching around, or have surpassed the age of 80. One of the biggest concerns in both government and media today is the possibility of a heavily skewed Supreme Court in favor of conservative policies. This, coupled with the fact that most leadership in our current government is being dominated by Republicans doesn’t bode well for the future of Democratic policies and bills, which directly affects Breyer as a judge. The pressure on him is …show more content…

Heller, in which Breyer disagreed with the majority and believed that the District of Colombia, did in fact have full permission to limit handgun laws. In his dissenting opinion, being the pragmatist that he is, Breyer states that the Second Amendment only provides context for militia-related, not self-related defense and concludes this, in turn, means that this amendment does not disable government intervention in pursuing these laws. Because Breyer is not an originalist of any sort, his dissenting opinion is one that tells of this nature and the belief that the Amendments do not provide

Show More
Related

John Blair Pros And Cons

1121 Words | 5 Pages

Supreme Court. On that same day, President Washington Sent a letter to congress, with the names of a chief and five justice associates and one of those associates was John Blair. The appointment came as a surprise to John Blair when he heard that he was an associate pick for the U.S. Supreme Court. But John Blair accepted it and resigned from the Virginia Supreme Court, to join the U.S. Supreme Court. Later Washington explained to Attorney General Edmund Randolph why he chose those people and said that the establishment of the New Supreme Court required “the selection of the fittest characters that would be able to expound law and the dispense of justice.”

Read More

Sonia Sotomayor Research Paper

519 Words | 3 Pages

On her 43rd birthday, June 25, 1997, she was nominated for U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals by President Bill Clinton. In addition to her work in the Court of Appeals, Sotomayor also began teaching adjunct law at New York University in 1998 and at Columbia Law School in 1999. This shows that she is smart because not everyone can become to be the youngest judge in the court. She is a hard working woman.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Litmus Tests For Potential Appellate Judges

787 Words | 4 Pages

The concerns that Senators have about federal appeals court nominees is unjust and unneeded. The only people in the court system who have the ability to overturn laws of legislation and policy are Supreme Court Judges, so it is wrong to subject appeals court nominees to strict ideological tests that the Justices are given. The Justices are the only people who can overturn or rule things unconstitutional, whether it is from cases, executive orders, or when the bureaucracy overstep its’ bounds. It does not matter what an appeals court nominees personal opinion is on a case, because he or she will be following the precedent already set up by the Supreme Court. It does not matter what the nominees opinion is on Roe v. Wade, because as an appellate

Read More

The House That Scalia Built Summary

234 Words | 1 Pages

In her Column “The House That Scalia Built”(2016), Jamie Stiehm argues suggest that supreme court justice Antonin Scalia is dead everything will fall apart. Stiehm backs her statement up with logos, she says “often callous in withering dissents on, for example, gay marriage.” Stiehm hopes to persuade her readers to think nothing will go the republicans way anymore. Stiehm uses a mocking sarcastic approach in her column to show she has no sympathy for his death and just wanted her way of thinking.

Read More

John Marshall: The Most Significant Changes In American History

1561 Words | 7 Pages

However, he served serve in the position briefly before and was appointed a secretary of state by President Adam in 1800. In the same year, Chief Justice Oliver Ellsworth resigned on the grounds of ill health. The president tenders reappointment to John Jay, the first Chief Justice but he refuses. Further, in 1881, he was appointed as chief justice and sworn in on February, 4. However, he continued serving as a secretary of

Read More

Neil Gorsuch Essay

508 Words | 3 Pages

I do think that Neil Gorsuch is qualified to take the position as the new supreme court justice. He is known to have an outstanding resume; He graduated from Harvard Law School and he studied under a lawyer named John Finnis. Neil knows what it is like to be a conservative on a liberal college campus. Gorsuch co-founded The MorningSide Review and The Federalist while he was in Columbia University in New York. Gorsuch and his two other co-founders believed that the campus had primarily liberal political views.

Read More

Evolution Of The Supreme Court Between 1953 And 2003

563 Words | 3 Pages

In the past, certain principles of the Supreme Court in accordance with the Fourth Amendment changed with each Chief Justice. Between the years 1953 and 2005, there had been three of them, each modifying the main focus and making exceptions to searches and seizures by police. Their names were Chief Justice Earl Warren, Warren E. Burger, and William H Rehnquist. With each alternation of each of them came the names referring to the Supreme Court for those time periods. First, the Warren Court, focused on bringing attention to the exclusionary rule in order to protect citizens from being charged with ilegally-obtained evidence.

Read More

Criminal Justice Kagan Research Paper

119 Words | 1 Pages

The youngest Justice member of the Supreme Court is Elena Kagan. Justice Kagan was born 55 years ago in New York, New York, on April 28, 1960. Kagan attended to Princeton University where she got her A.B, an M. Phil. from Oxford University and a J.D. from Harvard Law School. Justice Kagan clerked for Judge Abner Mikva and Justice Thurgood Marshall.

Read More

Personal Narrative: I Am Federal Chief Judge Merrick Garland

638 Words | 3 Pages

You don 't trust me, ask Mr. Trump 's Honorable sister, the Honorable Justice Ginsburg or the rest of the Honorable Supreme Court Justices of the United States of America. But I am standing to fight any Graduates, Professors, Congressmen, Senators or House Speakers. I have been dedicating my life serving you the American people. "Anytime you disagree with the Honorable Justice Garland, you know you are in difficult area." Over the past years, Justice Ginsburg, Mayo, Roberts, including Vice President Biden and President Obama often indicating that.

Read More

Supreme Courts Dbq

1112 Words | 5 Pages

The Supreme Court priorities from the time period of 1790 to 1865 were establishing the Judiciary Act of 1789, which was instrumental in founding the Federal Court System. The framers believed that establishing a National Judiciary was an urgent and important task. After the installation of Chief Justice John Marshall who “used his dominance to strengthen the court 's position and advance the policies he favored” (Baum 20). However, in the decision of the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803 was an example of the power he exuded “in which the Court struck down a Federal statute for the first time” (Baum 20). This created some internal conflict between Marshall and President Thomas Jefferson, however Marshall was able to diffuse this with

Read More

Earl Warren's Supreme Court Cases

1023 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout the course of America's History, there have been decisions in law that have defined the America as a country, that have reinvented laws for better or for worse, and have affected the lives of millions. Some of these impactful decisions fell under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court like Marbury v. Madison, Dred Scott v. Sandford, and Plessy v. Ferguson. Of course without the judgment of the Supreme Court Justices, none of the decisions could have been made. Earl Warren was a Supreme Court Justice who served from 1953 to 1969. During this period Earl Warren was truly able to leave a lasting impression on America’s history by helping decide court cases that were extremely important to the lives of millions in America then and now.

Read More

Term Limits In The Supreme Court

339 Words | 2 Pages

The Supreme Court is an extremely important part of government. As such, we need healthy judges that are on top of their mental game. Therefore, term limits are necessary because newer judges can have a different point of view, mental health will be reduced, and the majority of Americans support term limits. If we have newer judges they will have a different point of view. In the article, Christopher stated that “It would mean a court that more accurately refers the changes and judgements of the society.”

Read More

Gun Control In Chicago Essay

1828 Words | 8 Pages

Chicago should be an example to those on both sides of the gun argument. The city is living proof that strict gun regulations alone will not cause gun violence to go down. Unfortunately for gun control advocates, the ban on handgun ownership in Chicago was struck down in a landmark case known as McDonald v. City of Chicago. Two years ago, in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. ___, this Court held that the Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self-defense and struck down a District of Columbia law that banned the possession of handguns in the home.

Read More

Supreme Court Justices: Impeachment In The United States

929 Words | 4 Pages

This allows for new judges to come in and replace the old ones and bring new ideas and opinions to the court, but it also can cause problems for the ideology of the state as well. With new justices being appointed to the court, it takes away from the idea of outside interference and can allow for justices to be appointed to favor one specific side. The main point behind all my research is to see whether it would be more effective to have term limits established for justices on the United States Supreme Court, or all

Read More

Essay On Judicial Selection

801 Words | 4 Pages

Judicial selection is an intriguing topic as there are multiple ways that judges take their seat on the bench. The United States Constitution spells out how federal judges are selected and leaves it up to the individual states to establish their means for selecting judges. In federal courts, judges are appointed and it varies between appointment and election for state courts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between appointments and elections (as well as the multiple types of elections) and to give an opinion as to which is the better alternative. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and are confirmed on the advice and consent of the United States Senate.

Read More

More about Stephen G. Breyer's Influence On The Supreme Court

Related Topics

Open Document