ipl-logo

Stephen Jay Gould: The True Independence Of Science And Religion

1513 Words7 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The Relations Between Religion and Science

The True Independence of Science and Religion Stephen Jay Gould author and creator of the concept “nonoverlapping magisteria” writes that science and religion are not in conflict with one another. In fact, his theory of nonoverlapping magisteria expresses the argument that, “No such conflict should exist because each subject has a legitimate magisterium, or domain of teaching authority—and these magisteria do not overlap…The net of science covers the empirical universe: what is it made of (fact) and why does it work this way (theory). The net of religion extends over questions of moral meaning and value. These two magisterial do not overlap, nor do they encompass all inquiry (Gould, 1). Gould’s philosophy of nonoverlapping magisteria not only opens a door for a totally cooperative independent relationship between religion and science, but also strengthens and helps prove …show more content…

He called science “descriptive” and religion “prescriptive” (Habgood, Religion and Science). Positivism as defined by Dictionary.com is “a philosophical system founded by Auguste Comte, concerned with positive facts and phenomena, and excluding speculation upon ultimate causes or origins” (“Positivism” Dictionary.com). Like Gould and the National Academy of Sciences the definition of Positivism also has the word “fact” within the description, which is what the principles of what science is based on. Dictionary.com defines prescriptive as “depending on or arising from effective legal prescription, as a right or title established by a long unchallenged tenure” (“Prescriptive” Dictionary.com). This definition is a little tougher to decipher; yet, still makes sense. The words “long unchallenged tenure” make sense when put with comparison to religion. Religion when looked at through the Independence theory cannot be challenge by science. It is a set of magisterial rules that only God or the Church has authority over

Show More
Related
767 Words | 4 Pages

While the science versus faith argument has existed for centuries, only rarely do they ever work hand in hand. Richard Selzer, author of The Surgeon as Priest, breaks the barrier and explores the contrast between the two ideas, likening them, while breaking his piece into five distinct parts to help himself and the reader analyze it. Selzer uses process analysis, transition between first, second, and third person perspective, a plethora of literary techniques, as well as evocative syntax and diction to explore the conflict between religious anomalies and scientific conviction to propose his purpose, discussing in an almost interrogative fashion - when does zeal become iniquity? To start off his essay, Selzer begins talking directly to the

Read More
253 Words | 2 Pages

In his letter answering sixth-grade student Phyllis Wright’s question of whether scientists pray, Albert Einstein employs purposeful logos and diction to successfully distinguish the religiosity of true scientists from that others. Einstein logically builds his distinction by asserting that “a research scientist will hardly believe ... [in] prayer” and subsequently revealing that experienced scientists nevertheless develop a religious devotion towards “a spirit vastly superior to that of man.” This explicit presentation of the similarities and differences makes it clear how the scientists’ concepts of piety differ from conventional beliefs. Henceforth, Wright would conceptualize Einstein’s beliefs as a variation from the beliefs she is familiar

Read More
1059 Words | 5 Pages

For centuries, religion and faith—Christianity, in particular—consistently clashed with scientific ideas and theories. The controversy and debate, beginning from the Middle Ages, ranged from issues about the position of the Earth in the solar system, to the practice of medicine. Still, creationism and evolution, sparked immense disagreement amongst the religious and scientific communities, in comparison to any other issue. While major systems of faith strongly declare that their respective God created the universe and the earth, scientists such as Charles Darwin and George Lemaitre proposed theories of evolution and the Big Bang. Unable to come to a consensus, religion and science often do not associate with each other.

Read More
891 Words | 4 Pages

Entwistle makes a case that this is not entirely true, based upon the fact that the church and the scientific world have both been considered viable sources of knowledge throughout history and have borrowed from one another often (Entwislte, 2015). In one way or another, the church community has always influenced science, and vice versa. Therefore, in the second section of the book, Entwistle discusses in depth the historical interaction between “sacred” knowledge and “secular” knowledge with references to the struggles between the academic and church community over theories and beliefs about our world (Entwistle). He also compares moments throughout history where Psychology and Christianity were at odds with each other, as well as the times when they worked in harmony. It is pointed out that though there have been harsh proponents of religion being a hindrance to scientific progress, Christianity has played a huge part in the development of science

Read More
1381 Words | 6 Pages

Because of Galileo’s studies, he was put on trial by the Catholic Church for using science to “destroy” religion and its ideas. Galileo was actually a devout Catholic but he believed that science would not interfere with religion or his god where the Catholic Church disagreed with this in fear of losing their power. Because of issues like this, during this time period is what I like to think of “religion with science” meaning that the church only approved of science that supported the Catholic religion and if not then the Church would ban scientific books and figures. The idea of natural philosophy occurred which focused on fundamental questions about nature and the universe, but these ideas were brought into harmony with Christian doctrines.

Read More
550 Words | 3 Pages

Rocks of Ages by Stephen Jay Gould argued a concept called NOMA, which stands for Non-Overlapping Magisteria which is a philosophy of non-interference in certain domains of thought and inquiry, and in this specific book, Gould uses the idea of NOMA to argue for the separation of religion and science. His arguments revolved around three main topics: Defining NOMA, the history of science versus religion, and the psychology behind the rejection of NOMA. Although he touches almost every base for every question I could think of, I did not see the book as an easy read--the points seemed scattered and I couldn’t keep up with his thought process and its relation to his thesis. When one boils it down to whether or not his idea would work, the answer would have to be yes, but under unobtainable conditions, in my opinion.

Read More
895 Words | 4 Pages

It is brought to the attention by John Calvin when he proclaims that even though these advances are great, they are done by the work of God only. Calvin, later on, describes that subjects like astronomy are only able to be possible because of the “wisdom of God”, which distinguishes how effective religion was at the time(Doc 2). In most cases, this document was more deliberate for the people to realize that even though these advancements were being made, one shall not lose faith for this is done by the power of God. A further explanation is done by Marin Mersenne for she is able to indicate that if things are not collaborative with the church, it is within conscious to not display these disagreeable discoveries. This is done by the use of Mersenne explanation that even though a discovery has gone several experiments, but the church disagrees it is within the righteous actions to not publicize this new thinking (Doc 5).

Read More
654 Words | 3 Pages

Have you considered additional ancillary texts to help you? An additional ancillary source is “Evolution and Religion Can Coexist.” This article explains that religion and science are able to balance each other in principles or theories. The author states, “Religion is about ethics, or what you should do, while science is about what’s true.

Read More
743 Words | 3 Pages

The issue on whether religion and science can work together has been debatable for centuries. Neil DeGrasse Tyson in his article the Perimeter of Ignorance argues that science and religion cannot coexist. In his article, the author explains that religion is all about the Bible and the Bible primarily focuses on the explanation of the origin of the world. He puts forth the point that this concept is far different from what science is and that they do not complement each other. This essay intends to prove that religion and science can work together with no issues.

Read More
575 Words | 3 Pages

Was Christianity responsible, as some historians have argued, or perhaps even necessary, for the rise of modern science? These topics of religion and science are ones with a tumultuous history, a history that even today is fraught with inconstancies and unknowns. Wether or not they will ever be reconciled is still up for debate, but one thing is certain, it wont be any time soon. There seems to be two distinct sides to this argument, those who believe that Christianity played a starring role in the creation of the sciences, and those who don’t. Those who claim that Christianity played a pivotal role in the development of science, offer up many arguments in support of these claims.

Read More
1528 Words | 7 Pages

He points out that both science and religion are linked to imagination in some vital ways. The mutual connections that imagination and memes share with both science and religion show how imagination and meme theory could fit together and thus coexist to explain several problems on the world. On the one hand, from Berry’s point of view, instead of the stereotype that science only acknowledging evidence while religion only including faith as well as sacredness, imagination plays a vital role in both science and religion. He criticizes those fundamentalists of religion and science

Read More
1021 Words | 5 Pages

The human mind’s ability and innate desire to justify and explain the world and its phenomena has led to some of the most significant and world-altering discoveries and inventions, illustrated throughout the renaissance, enlightenment, scientific revolution, and industrial revolution. Logical pursuits comprise a significant capstone of human nature and progress. However, according to Rudolf Otto in The Idea of the Holy, these tendencies have created different dimensions of religion; the rational and non-rational, with the latter often times overlooked. The most significant difference between the rational and non-rational aspects of religion deal with their respective emphasis on reason and feeling. Rudolph Otto prioritizes the non-rational as offering a truer understanding of religion because he claims the core of all religious life revolves around experiences and feeling, not simply rational thought.

Read More
1244 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout the course of this essay we will be debunking the credibility of science, in terms of its theory on space’s specific rate of expansion, taking an intrinsic look at logic and truth by exploiting the hypocritical evidence of the atheist’s perspective, touching in on a linguistic point of view,

Read More
826 Words | 4 Pages

Christianity has shaped the Scientific Revolution in Europe in many different ways. The main argument is that it brought a new of thinking that relied on Empiricism and objectivism. The findings made by the revolution’s astronomers challenged the foundations of the truths of the Christian church and the Bible. Some studies show that it has shaped the Scientific Revolution, whereas others show that it has not. The research that shows Christianity does have a significant amount of impact on the Scientific Revolution mostly deal with the explicit conflict between religion and science.

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

Nicalea Greenlee Astronomy, 7 December 15, 2017 Science vs. Religion Science and religion has always been an argument for years. I think science and religion are both very important to the way of life and how we see the entire universe. But I believe religion is more believable than science. For science can be proven wrong at any given time and religion can never be stated untrue. Such as the story of creation, evolution, practices and beliefs can contradict these theories.

Read More

More about Stephen Jay Gould: The True Independence Of Science And Religion

Related Topics

Open Document