Scientific Thinking Dbq Essay

895 Words4 Pages

As time went from the 16th century to the 18th century, the Renaissance thinking transformed to the Scientific Revolution. Soon, it would enable a worldview in which people were not invoking the principles of religion as often as the Renaissance. As an example, these natural philosophers, known as scientists today, developed a new thinking in which the world was no longer geocentric. The thought of an Earth-centered universe as the Bible would say, transformed as heliocentric or in other words Sun-centered. Within this period, Scientists were starting to understand the world’s functions, for they created experiment methods incorporating discipline, mathematics, and the essential Scientist communication. Meanwhile, these motives were being developed …show more content…

It is proven by Thomas Hobbes as he exhibits that if any political leader were to disagree with the new scientific thinkings, it would definitely be disregarded or even banned. This is portrayed as Hobbes describes how, even though education is not the most popular topic, if rulers disagreed upon it they would do their best to “suppress” it (Doc 7). In most cases, Hobbes purpose in this document is to address the ultimate power of absolutists on how their power was able to control the science discoveries facile. In addition, a finance minister, Jean Baptiste Colbert displays by invoking how much the government supplies and supports financial most of the scientific attributions. Through claiming how much the advancements flourish with the financial support, Colbert is establishing that without the power of the government the sciences would not prosper (Doc 11). Colbert is most likely saying this because by being the finance minister he is seeing the constant commerce support of the political leader, Louis XIV, to the scientific developments. Furthermore, indicating the significant role and how much the sciences was affected by the political leaders and their …show more content…

It is brought to the attention by John Calvin when he proclaims that even though these advances are great, they are done by the work of God only. Calvin, later on, describes that subjects like astronomy are only able to be possible because of the “wisdom of God”, which distinguishes how effective religion was at the time(Doc 2). In most cases, this document was more deliberate for the people to realize that even though these advancements were being made, one shall not lose faith for this is done by the power of God. A further explanation is done by Marin Mersenne for she is able to indicate that if things are not collaborative with the church, it is within conscious to not display these disagreeable discoveries. This is done by the use of Mersenne explanation that even though a discovery has gone several experiments, but the church disagrees it is within the righteous actions to not publicize this new thinking (Doc 5). The purpose of Mersenne is to advocate the big role that religion had between the science discoveries at this time, for if these two arts did not agree with each other it shall not be displayed. Soon, it is safe to claim that religion had one significant effect on the Scientific