Steve And Brenton In Monster By Walter Dean Myers

798 Words4 Pages

In the United States in 2014, there were approximately 4.5 murders per 100,000 people but what makes Steve and Brenton different? “There are many things worth living for, a few things worth dying for, and nothing worth killing for.” Steve and Brenton are two young black males who are facing the world in their trial. They are both of the age of 15 and had been blamed for felony murder and robbery. Is Steve and Brenton innocent or are they actually guilty? That is not what matters in this case who's guilty who's innocent it’s how it was taken and how they felt after the trial that truly defined it. Steve Harmon and Brenton Butler are both on trial for murder but how do they make their case seen innocent through the eyes of the jury. Steve …show more content…

Steve Harmon, who was an accomplice to King, was part of the robbery which ended in the murder of Mr. Nesbitt. Harmon wasn’t the one who shot the man, but people claimed he was at the drugstore in Harlem when it took place and he was the lookout. They are on trial for felony murder and robbery. It all happened in December Steve claims that he was the look out because he wanted to be like King and Bobo Evans. Steve made a screenplay about all of this while in the prison cell to get away and act as if he wasn't the one living it. In the courtroom Steve had some troubles with a lot of racism and prejudice. Steve decided to go on the stand to prove his point otherwise they wouldn't believe him and the task wasn’t that easy but somehow he managed. The jury saw him through and he was claimed not guilty. His lawyer O’Brien wasn’t that happy in fact we think that she thought he was actually …show more content…

One reason is in they end they both go the same way. One example is both of their verdicts is innocent “ not guilty,” and they both end up closer to their family. Another reason is racism played a big role in their trial. An example is they both were looked at and they basically thought they were guilty because they were black until they made a testimony. My final reason is they both were accused of the same crime. My final example is in the stands they are accused for felony murder and robbery. Despite what these young men did they were still similar and judged by there looks, even though proven not guilty it didn't stop people from judging the young black men in the novel Monster, and the documentary “A murder on a Sunday