ipl-logo

Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation

653 Words3 Pages

There are many different types of governments in our world. The difficulty of forming a government is probably very intense. And with that, there are the citizens and their involvement, causing lots of room for failure. The government of the United States is particularly interesting on many levels. The Articles of Confederation ushered with it many issues regarding the agreeability within the governmental powers, and brought a multitude of problems with regard to balance among the government powers. This led to multiple conflicts between the federalist and anti-federalist social parties, as well as doubts if people could really rely on the constitution, and how our country would turn out if the citizens depended on it. The concerns addressed in the Articles of Confederation included where the government's strengths should be, how much power it should be give, and how authority should be represented and divided …show more content…

The big problem was that federalists and antifederalists had different thoughts and ideas that made an impact on their choices. The antifederalists wanted to maintain and protect the rights of the people, and they did this by giving the states more power; however, with barely no power in the government, there would be no purpose in making a government in the first place. They only did this to prevent going back to being ruled by a king, as many citizens were worried that with too much government power, the war would’ve been for nothing. But on the other hand, federalists had seen the constitution as faultless and wanted to protect its beliefs. Another part of organizing the government strength was the both sides' thoughts on the Bill of rights. The anti-federalists saw that the Bill of rights as very necessary, and federalists thought that the constitution was perfect the way it

Show More
Related
639 Words | 3 Pages

The problem was that the existing government, under the Articles of Confederation wasn't doing the job. It was too weak. There overall goal was to create a strong-central government without letting anyone gaining much power. Federalism Federalism is a compound republic, meaning it is made up of two governments. It is between two distinct governments which are subdivided into separate departments.

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

The problem was that the existing government, under the Articles of Confederation, just wasn't doing the job. It was too weak. The challenge was to create a strong central government without letting anyone, person, or group of people, get too much power. The Constitution guarded against tyranny in ways by having Federalism, Separation of Powers, and Checks and Balances treated

Read More
1511 Words | 7 Pages

The federal government does not have full, complete power of the government, due to the fact the federal government has to power to tax, regulate commerce, and put laws into place if and only if laws are so called “necessary and proper.” Another thing was for each branch of government to have their own separation of powers and check and balance other branches of government. Either though, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists did not agree on ideas, the Constitution is a document of the general compromise between the two political parties. The weakness of the Articles of the Confederation was resolved through the compromise of the Federalists and Anti-federalists political

Read More
872 Words | 4 Pages

First, there were a lot of problems with the Articles of Confederation. The Articles were not at all powerful and were not good for America. The US didn’t have a lot of money and they barely had any power. Under the Articles, the state possessed more power than the federal government.

Read More
211 Words | 1 Pages

Adopted by Continental Congress on November 15, 1777, The Articles of Confederation served as the United States Constitution and was in effect from March 1, 1781 to 1789 when the current Constitution took effect. The Articles of Confederation was a written document that entailed the position and function of the national government after the United States declared its independence from Great Britain. It established a weak central government that mostly prevented individual states from conducting their own foreign diplomacy. Until its ratification in 1789, it served as the first constitution of the United States. The Articles had more weaknesses than strengths.

Read More
263 Words | 2 Pages

As it applies to the Articles of Confederation there were many weaknesses in the way it went about governing the United States. For one, the loose federation of the states was too weak to act as a foundation to be considered or act as a central government. In addition the state legislatures had too much power and in turn had the ability to influence economic issues of all kinds. This strong legislature is the same one that allowed for mob ruling and actions by debtors. The Articles of confederation were also weak because the required congress to have all 13 colonies in agreement when a new tax was to be passed.

Read More
479 Words | 2 Pages

When the founders developed and drafted the U.S. Constitution, much contemplation and reflection was put into it. In Benjamin Franklin’s Address of Prayer he explains how different forms of government had been examined to create the best government possible. “We have gone back to ancient history for models of government, and examined the different forms of those Republics” (Palmer, 68). The Articles of Confederation were drafted during the Revolution in a time of crisis to unite the States, but it had many faults and was not strong enough to maintain the nation’s unity. Drafters of the Constitution saw many problems with the Articles of Confederation.

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

Following the Revolutionary War, America had just gained independance from Great Britain and needed to form a new government. The Articles of Confederation were established as an attempt to create a government that was unlike Britain’s. Unfortunately, the Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses. When in the process of repairing those weaknesses, the Federalists and the Anti-federalists formed. The Articles of Confederation were very weak as well as useless to America and because of this, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists could not agree on a new type of government.

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

The Articles of the Confederation was the first government constitution that the United States used, and, although there were strength like the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, there were major weaknesses of the Articles of the Confederation like the following: requiring 9 out of the 13 colonial votes from the representatives from different states to pass a law; having no executive and judicial branch; and the federal government being unable to impose tax revenue onto the states. Such flaws would eventually lead to the Constitution and the repeal of the articles, for the Constitution was a measure to fix the problems of the articles with a stronger government that allowed them to impose taxes and and implement new laws for a more effective government.

Read More
464 Words | 2 Pages

One of these things was the amount of power the federal government should have. Federalists argued for a stronger national government, with the rich having most of the power because they were "less wicked and sinful" (Alexander Hamilton). Antifederalists wanted stronger state governments and wanted all people to be represented, not just the rich elites. They wanted the government to be "a true picture of the people" (Melancton Smith). This debate doesn't have as clear-cut of an ending as the one above; instead, it led to the division of two political parties and is still a major debate

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

In one hand, the Articles of Confederation had a weak central government, differing form the strong central government in the Constitution. The Constitution’s government had a structure of three different branches; the legislative, executive, and judicial branch; unlike the Articles of Confederation that had no structure whatsoever. The Articles of Confederation had many problems like, the poor international trade, poor foreign relations and a weak economy in contrast to the Constitution that only had one problem, the struggle over the ratification. the Articles of Confederation achieved the Northwest Ordinance and the Northwest Territory and according to a history website, the Constitution achieved that we had a system of checks and balances, that we had a bill of rights, and, eventually, the survival of a bloody civil war intact. Lastly, the Constitution had three compromises: the Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise and the Slave Trade compromise.

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

With a revolution starting, the thirteen colonies needed to implement a new government to replace, and improve upon the British one that the colonies were fighting against. The Founding Fathers’ first attempt at such a government was drafted and defined in the Articles of Confederation. This draft was put in front of the Second Continental Congress in 1777. It was completely ratified and adopted by March 1, 1781. While battles large and small enveloped the fledling country, it was written quickly, and in the grand scheme of things was also adopted and implemented rather quickly.

Read More
251 Words | 2 Pages

When the Articles of Confederation failed to organize the citizens and the economy of America its citizens decided to advocate for a different form of government, that arose in the creation of the Constitution, the supreme law of the land. As a new form of government was presented the fear that the American Revolution had brought upon the colonies lead to the creation of two different political groups the Federalist and Anti- federalist that stood for those who feared the government and those who believed that the government should be stronger. Based on the Federalist papers I believe that the Anti- federalist had a better argument as they pushed for the protection of individual rights and the limitation of the power of the government. Federalist

Read More
964 Words | 4 Pages

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists were arguing about the strength of the strong central government and the weak central. strong state government. The Federalists held that to preserve the independence that the country had gained in the American Revolution, a more powerful federal government with jurisdiction over the states was required. The Anti-Federalist supported strong state governments, a weak federal government, and the support of individual liberty for national politics. The Federalists and Anti-federalists were arguing because of government power and the Anti-federalists were correct because all Americans voted for their rules.

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

The Articles of Confederation were a document seen as the “first” constitution of the United States. This document granted the new national government power to control the military, declare war, and create treaties between the states. However, the Articles had holes in it considering the government did not have the power to tax, create laws without at least nine states’ approval, or change the Articles of Confederation without a unanimous vote. This means that the country soon fell into debt and petty arguments between state, the new government had no control. It was time for a change.

Read More

More about Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation

Open Document