Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
4Th Amendment
The 4th amendment explained
The 4th amendment explained
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
4Th Amendment
The 4th amendment explained
The 4th amendment explained
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: 4Th Amendment
In the past students did not know the guidelines of what they could say at school,but the students at Des Moines brought attention to the rights of every student at school(Blacher 10). Things changed in the 1960's many students wore black armbands to school as a way of protesting the Vietnam War (Blacher 11).The Des Moines school banned them from wearing their armbands(“Case summary:Tinker”1). Mary Beth and John Tinker believed it was their constitutional right to be able to express how they feel(“Case summary:Tinker”1). They decided to take their case to the courts. case went all the way to the supreme court(“Case summary:Tinker”1).
Supreme Court on March 28, 1995. The court noted that the Fourth Amendment, which forbids unreasonable searches and seizures, was extended (by the Fourteenth Amendment) to cover searches and seizures by state officers, including those at public schools, Since the collection and testing of urine under the school policy was a search and thus subject to the Fourth Amendment, it was necessary to turn to the question of reasonableness. To that end, the court pointed out that even though school officials are agents of the state, as a result of their custodial and tutelary relationship with students, they have the authority to act in loco parentis in safeguarding the children in their care. The court then cited the fact that schoolchildren are already subjected to physical examinations, such as scoliosis testing, and to various vaccinations. According to the justices, student athletes have a lesser expectation of privacy than their peers who are not athletes.
School Dress Code is Too Strict Students get in trouble for several dress code violations because school dress code is too strict. Mostly dealing with shorts, shirts, sometimes backpacks, and uniforms. These are some of the biggest issues in school that teachers and the school districts need to understand. To start with, shorts and short dresses are one of the greatest problems in school.
She had the right to wear the armband and the school was violating her freedom of expression. The school violated the kids first amendment and did not let them express their feelings in school. The First Amendment clearly states, It guarantees freedom of expression by prohibiting Congress from restricting the press or the rights of individuals to speak freely (LII). When the kids enter the school, their rights are not taken away from them and they can use their rights at any time.
Even though some people may disagree, random locker searches should be an issue that is enforced. Parents do not want their children in danger to due to some adolescents. Drugs and guns could be secluded and then there could be a prodigious chance of somebody getting hurt. Having drugs at school is restricted and dangerous. It is dangerous because somebody could use some, go crazy, and hurt people.
Chapter three does a good job pointing out that compulsory attendance laws served as an impetus for challenging schools over both their segregationist and exclusionary policies toward students of differing race and ability (Yell, 2016, p. 36). At the time our government was sending a very ambiguous message to students and their families. On one hand, the law of the land dictated that students must attend school, conversely schools continued to exclude students with disabilities. This inherent contradiction let to parent advocacy groups challenging schools for the fair and equal treatment of their children.
If it’s legal in the country it’s funded by, and it’s a public place, the students can wear it. The dress code is illegal for two reasons. Yes, it is legal to tell students and employees what to wear. It is however illegal to tell students what to wear based on a certain minority they might be part of.
Most people think that all amendments are automatically given to everyone, but it was not always like that. The Tinker v. Des Moines case is about the First Amendment and how a group of students in 1965 were suspended from school because they were wearing black armbands in order to protest against the Vietnam War .What does the First Amendment have to do with wearing armbands? Well, The First Amendment is the right to free speech, religion, expression, opinion, and press. The First Amendment was created in order to give every human the freedom of choosing. The Supreme Court 's decision to side with the students changed the way students express themselves today.
Officers in schools can be a great advantage and disadvantage when it comes to controversy. In America, others say that we may have too much police involvement within the schools. Although, officers being involved in schools could abuse the power that they have. An example of an officer of the law abusing their power would be in New York when an officer asked a student to remove safety pins holding up his glasses, and then had tackled and arrested the student. Officers are not the only ones to blame considering students have been acting out in ways such as rape, robbery with a deadly weapon, and students threatening attacks.
It may seem a little invasive, but schools are permitted to use drug dogs to sniff out contraband during unannounced, random searches and it becomes a controversial problem for all. The use of drug-sniffing dogs in schools is permitted because students do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the school and school search did not go against the Fourth Amendment, which is the right of people to be secure in their personal spaces houses and papers. While drug dogs are becoming more and more commonplace in our public schools and to maintaining a drug-dog program can cost district estimates $12,000 and $36,000 every year. Drug dog must go through a long period of time of training and drug dogs are not dangerous to people, but instead it protects people. Without reservation, we must know the history background, advantages, and disadvantages of having a drug dog searches.
Being able to choose what to wear is a right students are allowed to have, but schools are constantly trying to change that. Religious wear is not being accepted as part of the dress code causing problems between the school and the student whose identity is being taken away from them along with the boy who could not stand trying to be like everyone and ended his own life. Down to the basic right as a human to experience life just as anyone else has. There are many more reason as to why schools should allow students to dress how they want to, but these three reasons provide all of the points needed. Overall, schools should get rid of the dress codes enforced and allow the students to explore their
Law enforcement presence in schools is a topic that has been spoken about by many researchers throughout the years and has brought up a lot of controversial thoughts and ideas. Many researchers that have conducted research that is related to this topic have mentioned how they came across studies that made them come up with conclusions about school law enforcement officers that were rather mixed than geared towards one side of the spectrum (Bracy, 2010). The studies that I looked into were very similar in that many of them looked down upon the idea of having law enforcement officers present in schools, while a small handful felt that it has more pros than it does cons. Na and Gottfredson (2013), for example, conducted a study in which they
In the article, Arguments Against School Uniforms, it says “ policies(dress codes) place limitations on freedom of expression…” This quote explains why most kids think dress codes are living nightmares. When all students look the same, it doesn’t let them express who they really are. Whenever kids wear what they want, they can express their personality through what they wear. On the contrary, the only problem about not having dress codes is that some kids bully each other for what they wear, which is totally unacceptable.
Any girl who has attended a public high school understands the daily dilemma of dress code. On those scorching hot days as the school year approaches summer, many girls can be found scavenging through their closet for a “school appropriate” outfit or one they won’t melt into a sweaty puddle in. Her dresses will show too much leg, her tops will inappropriately expose her shoulder or collar bone, and her shorts will be too short — at least that 's what the school says. Dress code in modern day high schools should be boycotted because they are a violation to student and parents rights, sexist, out of date, a double standard, and they disrupt a female students education. It 's fair to agree with a policy that claims stringent dress codes increase the emphasis on academics and reduce the pressure of socioeconomic status; however, these dress codes violate the students First Amendment right to freedom of expression and the parents’ Fourteenth Amendment right to raise their children in their own way.
School dress code isn’t just a list of clothes you can and cannot wear, it’s a violation of your First Amendment rights. Dress code is a set of guidelines in reference to clothing. Most schools use different dress codes, but they are very common throughout the United States. Dress code is said to be used as a way to protect students in schools, but dress code is used for many different things, it can be a good thing, and it can also be a bad thing. To begin, dress code is typically a set of rules that gives a detailed list to what you can and can not wear.