Why Should Officers Be Allowed In Schools
An officer is working for the public helping to protect and to help keep everyone safe from danger. The public does not work as an officer because they are not trained or are aware of how the job works. When misusing your power this takes an effect on the public and how they will function around the police. You want the public to feel welcome and that they feel safe knowing that there is an officer around. Police that are leaving horrible impressions on the public is what ruins the relationship between the people and officers.
(Response): There are not enough resource officers for every school in the nation, let alone high schools. 2. (Rebuttal): Resource officers can be there to prevent incidents from occurring just as well. 2. (Response): True, but resource officers are not in every classroom at every moment of every day, they may be on the campus every day, but not necessarily in each classroom – teachers, however, are in each classroom.
I understand shootings have happened in the past at schools, but I don’t think having police officers in the school is going to stop someone from shooting someone if they really wanted. It seems to me that the police officers are affecting more things in the school than actually helping. If the police officers are going to stay in schools I think they should only interfere when they are needed, for example when there is violence happening. I think that punishment should be by the schools principle or school board, like it used to be. I cannot seem to understand why I police officer would arrest a four year old child, I feel like they should be smarter than that and should know
People have their opinions of Chicago, you’ll hear different things from anyone you’d talk to, but rumors and stereotypes aren’t things that don’t come from a backstory or base ground. Talk spreads like a wild forest fire and articles are going to be published, but one article in particular talks about a “school that calls the police on students every other day” (Richards & Cohen). When it comes to students who come from a hard upbringing, the police are people you are taught to be afraid of. When a student is under the stress of not only school and life at home, but to add the pressure of police and security is just adding another issue to a student’s issues. Take the student Reggie from Holler If You Hear Me for example who was “attacked by a cop” (Michie 155). When a student’s mental health is already deteriorating and then a cop, someone who they are taught to fear, that student will most likely have a reaction, and it wouldn’t be a good one.
Violent criminals know that currently schools are gun free zones, and can use this factor to their advantage. Rather than falling victim to an attack on the school; teachers could protect themselves and their students. Students could feel much safer if their teacher was armed. Students would feel more safe if they knew they could be protected from an attack from an intruder or another student. Criminals know that teachers currently are not armed and could potentially see schools as a target.
So by arming teachers this will give some fear in a potential shooters eyes versus a shooter knowing they can march into any school they want to and kill students and teachers without anyone putting up a fight until first responders getting to the
“Every Teacher in America Should Have a Gun” by Steve Siebold delivers the message about why teachers should be armed with guns. Primarily he thinks that shooters will be less motivated to try to attack a school that is able to defend itself against the gunman. He also goes on to say that “Every second counts in a school shooting. Calling 911 and waiting for police to arrive isn’t good enough.” He gives us the idea that we need to take action against these shooters and potentially end school shootings once and for all.
Teachers did not go into their profession to be babysitters, and they certainly didn 't go into it to be security guards. Now society is trying to force them to be both. How anyone could possibly secure those weapons so that students could never obtain them would be a nightmare- and unrealistic? And to think that if a school full of teenagers can access a weapon in every classroom that violence would decrease is absurd. There are many negatives to teachers owning guns such as: cost of training and weapons, teachers turning against their students, and keeping teacher who has the gun a secret.
Resolutions are vehemently being sought to protect schools from possible attacks and to objectively eradicate deadly school shootings altogether. Commonly, security officers are placed in schools in hopes that increased surveillance will inhibit violent outbreaks (Crawford and Burns 2016). Mixed evaluations have been found in association with security officers, while some benefits reportedly transpire, experiences of disparaging consequences remain a regrettable reality as well (Crawford and Burns 2016). Additionally, active shooter drills routinely occur at schools across the nation, however, as Jillian Peterson and James Densley report in their CNN article titled, “The Usual Approach to School Security Isn’t Working,” studies indicate that
If students completely trust their teachers, they may be comforted but many students rarely feel that level of comfort with every teacher in the building (Singer). This proves that not all students get along with every teacher there is in their school, there’s many that don’t even talk to their teachers at all. When you have two people shooting at each other, bystanders get caught in the crossfire. This is not a good environment for children (Singer). This means that students could accidently get in the middle of the two people that have a gun and there’s a possibility that the student can get injured.
In these discussions some people advocate for arming teachers while others believe that placing armed guards at schools will resolve the issue. In response to violence
Law enforcement presence in schools is a topic that has been spoken about by many researchers throughout the years and has brought up a lot of controversial thoughts and ideas. Many researchers that have conducted research that is related to this topic have mentioned how they came across studies that made them come up with conclusions about school law enforcement officers that were rather mixed than geared towards one side of the spectrum (Bracy, 2010). The studies that I looked into were very similar in that many of them looked down upon the idea of having law enforcement officers present in schools, while a small handful felt that it has more pros than it does cons. Na and Gottfredson (2013), for example, conducted a study in which they
It’s better to not leave it all up to chance and to stick with the public service of law enforcement, certified protectors, who can truly handle the job. The fight or flight situation, also known as hyperarousal, is a very detrimental affect to authorizing teachers to have firearms. It is a reflex, the go-to response in a stressful situation. And, what can be more stressful than a school shooting or having to shoot someone yourself? In this, giving teachers this responsibility, there is always the
Katie Walls P3 11:00 Is It Safe? Should law enforcement officers be present in schools? This can be a controversial topic because of the recent situations that have happened. Some may argue School Resource Officers should not be placed in schools because, they implant the youth into the criminal justice system at a young age. Others may argue they should be placed in schools because they help keep the students safe.
When one hears "school security" these days, the word that goes with it is "tighten." Indeed, given both external threats and unruly (sometimes violent) student behavior, it makes sense to think that the most sensible course of action is to err on the side of more stringent measures, harsher sanctions and less permissive administration. It largely comes down to liability - whenever an individual with a history of troubled or criminal behavior snaps or becomes involved in an incident severe enough to attract government or media attention, many of the questions asked in the aftermath are variations on "why was this person not in jail. " The same applies to schools, where administrators often end up having to justify themselves to parents and
More about Why Should Officers Be Allowed In Schools
Pros And Cons Of Missouri State Patrol
1093 Words | 5 PagesPros And Cons For Arming Teachers
666 Words | 3 PagesWhen Schooling Meets Policing Summary
512 Words | 3 PagesSummary Of Holler If You Hear Me
1261 Words | 6 PagesShould Teachers Be Allowed To Be Armed During School Hours?
578 Words | 3 PagesShould Teachers Carry Guns Essay
861 Words | 4 PagesTeachers Should Have A Gun
212 Words | 1 PagesShould Teachers Carry Guns In School Essay
787 Words | 4 PagesSchool Shootings: A Symbolic Analysis
765 Words | 4 PagesShould Teachers Be Allowed To Stop School Shootings
1846 Words | 8 PagesColumbine High School Shootings
1017 Words | 5 PagesLaw Enforcement Presence In Schools
1942 Words | 8 PagesPersuasive Essay On Guns In School
758 Words | 4 PagesShould Police Officers Be-Placed In Schools
1096 Words | 5 PagesArgumentative Essay On School Security
933 Words | 4 Pages