The Holocaust Museum it showed some elements of subjectivity and objectivity. The definition of objectivity is representing facts and giving true information in an situation. Subjectivity is someone giving their opinion or being emotional towards the situation. In the article it presented objectivity and subjectivity to the reader. In most articles or text they can show more objectivity than subjectivity or vise versa. Some non-fiction texts are The Nuremberg Laws and The Holocaust Part 2: The Final Solution each show more objectivity than subjectivity. Although various articles can show more of objectivity or subjectivity the material in the article At The Holocaust Museum, subjectivity and objectivity are both balanced in the article. The topic is shown in an objective way because in the text, it has evidence of how it is shown. For example, “The notorious death camps in Poland, where over more than one million Jews were killed.” This is how the central idea is developed. The quote shows how the Jews were treated and what the concentration was like. Accordingly, the quote shows that the article is objective because When it says that one million Jews were killed, it is showing that it is a fact in the article. Another piece of evidence of why this article was objective. In the text it says “Charred …show more content…
The article balanced out with the subjectivity and objectivity. It aloud the reader to get pieces of information and opinions to help understand of what happened during the Holocaust. The reading had some objectivity, which helped the reader get information and facts about the Holocaust to explain it. It also had subjectivity which provided the reader with other people 's opinions towards the matter. This article was able to show objectivity and subjectivity in various ways to help the reader understand the people who went to the museum to see what the Jews went