ipl-logo

Sue's Argument On Abortion

1867 Words8 Pages

Abortion is a very controversial issue, with strong opinions on both sides. As time goes on the moral and legal debate on whether or not abortion is morally acceptable or legally justified goes on. There is no doubt that abortion is an issue primarily with women, because they are the ones that carry the baby inside of them for nine months. I’m surprised I haven’t found or heard of many stories where the father of this child speaks out. I would like to look at the father’s rights in abortion. In other words: Fathers consent on abortion? First, I will set up a moral system to evaluate and solve this dilemma. Second, I will describe a case about this issue and then offer a morally reasoned solution to the issue. Finally, I will offer my conclusions …show more content…

Sue is revering this child’s right to life. In this case Sue is in violation in the child’s rights. Because Sue’s life is not in danger because of this pregnancy there is no greater good. The Principle of Goodness or Rightness is violated in this case. Sue is violating this right because she is going to harm the baby by ending the child’s life. This is violating the nonmaleficence of the Principle of Goodness or Rightness. Jim is also violating the beneficence of this right because according to Sue what she is doing is good and not out of badness. Ending this pregnancy means Sue can move on with her life and forget about her failed marriage and this is good for Sue. Also Sue is violating Jim’s beneficence right in this principle in the same way. This is because according to Jim the act of ending the pregnancy is bad to him because he wants the baby to live. He wants the baby to have a life. The Principle of Justice or Fairness is violated in Sue’s case because her acts are bad against the baby and Jim. Because everyone should have an equal right of obtaining good or bad this is not giving that equal opportunity. If sue ends the pregnancy she is the only person obtaining good. If the baby remains in the womb and the pregnancy is taken to a healthy full term. The baby obtains good by getting a chance at life. Also Jim obtains good by getting the child he always wished he had. Sue …show more content…

Jim wants to have this child and raise it. He is entitled to make the moral decisions for this fetus just as much as Sue is. In this case the principles are going to violate each other’s rights, because they have conflicting views. Sue wants to end this pregnancy because her marriage failed and she just wants to move on with her life. Jim wants to continue with the pregnancy because he wants the child no matter how their relationship turned out. In this situation I have to look at what is in the best interest for this child. The best interest would be for Sue to continue with the pregnancy and then when the child is delivered she can give up her rights to the child and Jim would only be responsible for raising the child. It is going to be hard to force Sue to continue with the pregnancy because that is a huge violation to her. Since it is Sue’s body and she has the right to do what she will with her body and who uses it. The child is also Jim’s too he put up his half for that baby to be conceived. If Jim never gave his half the baby would never even be alive inside Sue. In this case you have to look at the greater good. If Sue does what she wants to do and that is to end the pregnancy that is not the greater good. The greater good would be to give life to the child and that benefits the child and give Jim the child. That is

Show More
Related
565 Words | 3 Pages

Therefore the right to life does not entail security from getting killed in general, but rather not to be killed unjustly. Her main argument is that there is no definite answer as to whether abortion is morally right or wrong. It all depends on each

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

He also describes the morality of killing and concludes that the act of abortion is comparable to the act of killing a fully grown, adult human being that is a part of the moral community. This claim leads to the overarching view that because the act of killing an adult person is morally wrong, abortion is ultimately morally impermissible as well. Throughout his argument, Marquis builds to his overall conclusion that abortion is morally impermissible because the act of killing is morally wrong. He places the same moral standing of a fully developed, adult human being on fetuses, stating that aborting a fetus withdraws its potential to have valuable future experiences, projects, and enjoyments. However, Marquis’s argument does not provide any reasoning on behalf of the mother’s potential future after the fetus is developed and born, and does not allow any clarification on the true personhood held by the fetus compared to the mother’s already fully developed

Read More
273 Words | 2 Pages

Patrick Lee and Robert George assert that abortion is objectively immoral. One of Lee and George’s main reason for coming to this conclusion is that human embryos are living human beings. This essentially validates that abortion is indeed the process of killing a human. Another main point said by the two is a rebuttal to a common argument used in favor of abortion, which states that a potential mother has full parental responsibilities only if she has voluntarily assumed them. The rebuttal to this was that the potential mother does indeed have special responsibilities to raise the child.

Read More
1865 Words | 8 Pages

Wade should be reconsidered and potentially overturned due to the potential moral backlash. As a society, humans condone various forms of violence, sexual misconduct, and other unbecoming behavior. Certain laws within the United States criminalize animal abuse on the basis of animals holding a moral significance within the grand scheme of reality, but yet our moral qualms are divisive when considering the potential of a new human life. As it currently stands, infants in the womb are not considered viable and are not considered morally significant. This may in fact be an overstatement in the sense that humanity and the law does in fact care about the protection and safety of a potential human life, but regardless of this notion, the law reflects support for the belief that the moral significance of a mother’s life is more important than that of the fetus.

Read More
1070 Words | 5 Pages

In “A Defense of Abortion,” Judith Thomson argues with a unique approach regarding the topic of abortion. For the purpose of the argument, Thomas agrees to go against her belief and constructs an argument based on the idea that the fetus is a person at conception. She then formulates her arguments concerning that the right to life is not an absolute right. There are certain situations where abortion is morally permissible. She believes that the fetus’s right to life does not outweigh the right for the woman to control what happens to her own body.

Read More
1576 Words | 7 Pages

She is deciding based upon what she needs and doesn’t need in her life. The mother is not making the decision to kill the fetus just because she had a whim and thought it would be fun. Many people think about the fetus but not about how the mother is expected to care for it inside and outside of her

Read More
465 Words | 2 Pages

A pressing women’s right issue that has divided the nation for the last 40 years is Abortion. It’s a procedure in which a woman medically terminates her pregnancy, this option to terminate a pregnancy has come under great fire due to moral permissibility and ethical concern. The right to abortion was granted on a constitutional basis under the landmark decision by the supreme court case, “Roe Vs. Wade” but has been attacked and attempted to be dismantled by sweltering opposition by several special-interests groups.

Read More
794 Words | 4 Pages

As humans, we are given different rights that are meant to provide us with a chance at a good life. However, these rights can become compromised when it comes to conflicts between a pregnant woman and her fetus. The right of the fetus to live is seen as inferior to the right of the mother to have an abortion. Although each of the rights is different, it is not appropriate to say that one citizen’s rights are more superior than another citizen’s rights.

Read More
1641 Words | 7 Pages

Since this theory considers actions as “good” if they create the most amount of “happiness” for the most amount of people and the least amount of “unhappiness” the least amount of people, one could argue that most family members of both the husband and the wife would be much happier if the wife could deliver the baby. It would allow them to see a positive outcome from a horrible situation. On a larger scale, the state of Kansas may perceive the unborn child as potentially a positive addition to society, and thus, although the parents may be unhappy, the rest of society may be happier with the addition of a citizen who can potentially help the world be a better place. Conversely, a theory that may condemn this Kansa’s law as unethical is the theory of cultural relativism.

Read More
1660 Words | 7 Pages

This case then evidently reveals the issue of; how can the law or a person of the law determine what is the best for every individual. Caroline De Costa states "It leads to abortion occupying a very grey area in

Read More
695 Words | 3 Pages

“The second case, Doe v. Bolton, focused on a more lenient Georgia law that allowed a woman the right to terminate her pregnancy when either her life or her health was in danger” (Rosenberg). Ultimately, in both cases the lower court’s had declared the statutes unconstitutional

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

In Dobson (Litigation parent of) v. Dobson, a grandfather attempted to behave on behalf of a baby born with cerebral palsy, supposedly because of a automobile accident in which the mom became the motive force. He tried to sue the mother with negligence in driving. The mother turned into in favor of the fit succeeding, as it might have supplied her with finances to raise her disabled infant, whilst her coverage agency became defending the suit thru subrogation. mentioning the city of Kamloops v. Nielsen, the courtroom decided that courts can not impose a obligation of automobile e on a pregnant woman toward her fetus as it would intrude with the exercising of her autonomy rights throughout pregnancy, and the issue in defining a preferred of care in pregnancy. handiest a legislature can do this.

Read More
1018 Words | 5 Pages

The birth mother of the child is happy because she does not have the burden of raising a child that she did not wish for and a couple, and their immediate family, receive happiness from a child that has now entered their life. In this scenario, questions like “what if no one ever adopt the child?” arises. It could be so, but a child can still have the potential of happiness in life through a life they were granted by the mother going through with the pregnancy. In this view, an abortion is not morally permissible because by not getting one it

Read More
803 Words | 4 Pages

In recent years, it has become more and more apparent that the adolescents of today are unfit for the responsibilities currently available to them. Equipping someone who is unable to fathom the risks of the decisions they make with the power to put themselves and others in danger is far too precarious. For this reason, the age at which adolescents become adults currently established is dangerously low. The age of legal adulthood should be 25, because at this age young adults are truly capable of comprehending the consequences of their actions and are able to handle the responsibilities of adulthood.

Read More
1085 Words | 5 Pages

(Tanner) Pro-choice defenders also say that it is the woman 's right to choose to have the baby or not, forgetting the baby 's rights. The life of a human being begins at the moment of conception, and it is not the fetus´s fault if the mother wasn 't ready to have a baby or if the situation in which baby was conceived wasn 't ideal. For example, if the baby is conceived by rape, the baby should not pay the consequences of other people, he or she has not done anything wrong .”Compassion for the mothers is extremely important, but it is never

Read More

More about Sue's Argument On Abortion

Related Topics

Open Document