ipl-logo

Sula During The Civil War Essay

591 Words3 Pages

An example where Sulla’s severe measures in response to C. Marius is evident was during the war against the king of Pontus, Mithridates. That’s when Sulla came to an open rupture with C. Marius after the senate ordered him to be the one to undertake the position of highest command in the expedition. The same instruction, however, was given to Marius from the assembly of the people. Τhe prospect of a campaign in the East, which would yield a rich loot to him and his soldiers, fascinated Sulla, he was going to do what it takes to secure the opportunity. Sulla, used his violent ways, employing his army, to force the public to accept the Senate’s decision and halt the democratic approaches of Marius. This action was not just a conflict created at the level of political confrontation against Marius, but it also showed the role the army had already taken over. The army lost its national spirit, it took a business form and became a tool in the hands of Sulla used in order to serve his ambitions. It led to wars not intended for the greatness of Rome …show more content…

He was successful in being the dominant power during the civil war. During this war there was a gap of power in the higher state axioms. Sulla was able to reactivate the old and respected ordinance of the interregnum and to initially declare himself as interrex. To achieve his political goals, he was later self-proclaimed dictator, a post he held for four years (82-79 BC). In 83 BC he started wildly pursuing the democrats that supported Marius. Over 4700 Roman citizens were executed and their properties were confiscated and sold by auction offering great fortunes to his followers. He also transferred all the legislative power to the Senate and removed the laws of the Gracchi. All of these harsh actions done in order to go against the democratic political views of Marius were very unjustified and

Show More
Related
440 Words | 2 Pages

Sulla also saw the potential in Pompey, who would become a military and political leader in the later Roman republic, and offered him many military missions. The legacy of Sulla lived on in him, as Pompey aimed to enforce the existing law reforms Sulla had made to the constitution of the Roman Republic, stating 'If Sulla could, why can't I?', according to Cicero. Despite Sulla's reforms not lasting long, he still had a large impact on the fall on the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman

Read More
1569 Words | 7 Pages

In February of 1861, seven states from the deep south, South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana and Texas, decided to secede from the union. The succession was due to the growing fear that the institution of slavery would be stripped from them. Prior to the succession, from the 1790s to then, there had been constant conflict instigating that the north and south were progressing in two very different directions, and by the time of the Civil War there a significant wedge had been driven between the northern and southern states. There were four significant and critical incidents that wedged a gap between the north and south and led to the coming of the American Civil War, the invention of the cotton gin, Nat Turner’s

Read More
491 Words | 2 Pages

April 12, 1861. Confederate forces fired shots at the fort Sumpter and Union troops surrendered sparking the Civil War. Though, how did it come to this? As one can see, evidence shows the primary cause of the Civil War was slavery because of the many more slaves than free blacks, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 fought over slave or free states, and Dred Scott fought for his freedom from slavery.

Read More
612 Words | 3 Pages

The United States Constitution was established to provide basic rights and a government for the people. Much blood was shed, along with many casualties in the American Revolution to insure Americans could implement the policies and powers of the Constitution. In the election of 1860, Abraham Lincoln was elected President of the United States; however, his political views on slavery were not welcomed in the South. Consequently, Lincoln’s election sparked panic for the South knowing that he would undermine slavery. In order to insure that slavery continued, Southern states attempted to make two Constitutional provisions; consequently, they were denied.

Read More
1492 Words | 6 Pages

The Life of Marius, written by Plutarch, is a fascinating ancient source detailing the career of the Roman Gaius Marius, 127-86BC. While there are interpretive and reliability issues, the Life of Marius is a particularly useful and significant source. It is our only extensive primary source on Marius, who was a key political figure of late Republican Rome. Additionally, Plutarch’s work indicates not only many crucial military and political development in Rome in the time period, but also gives a reflection of Plutarch’s own Rome and its values and political climate.

Read More
568 Words | 3 Pages

“Yesterday is not ours to recover, but tomorrow is ours to win or lose” Lyndon B. Johnson. The civil war, a sad time for Americans, separated the country over slavery and states rights. This led to the deaths of over 600,000 Americans between Union and Confederate soldiers. Out of the eleven confederate states, Texas was one of them. Texans fought in the civil war to defend state’s rights, preserve slaves, and for the love of Texas.

Read More
934 Words | 4 Pages

(Appian, Civil Wars 100) Despite the tribunes losing much power to initiate legislation, Cicero implies the government was more stable, and therefore strengthening the Roman Republic. Despite the huge changes he made to the Roman political sphere, Sulla abdicated as dictator and retirement from Roman politics in 81 BC along with restoring the people’s right to elect consuls. Rev. Hubert A. Holden writes that Sulla was ‘proud of his uniquely faithful fortune’ and that he gave up his power willingly. This showcases Sulla’s attempt to revert Rome back to more conservative Republican values, exemplifying the interpretation that Sulla’s march on Rome did not seal the fate of the Roman Republic.

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

The two out four questions that I choose are to 1.) Discuss the causes of the civil war. Cite as many facts as possible to back up your analysis. And answer 2.) If the enduring vision of America is embodied in the Declaration of Independence's statements about equality and universal rights to justice, liberty, and self-fulfillment, how much progress toward those ideals had blacks and women made by 1877?

Read More
665 Words | 3 Pages

He managed to hold up Rome with his strength and character for his lifetime. The senate felt threatened by him so they killed him. There was a wide range of emotions and it started many civil wars. This completely caused a change in the government, and borught about the Roman Empire. Afterwards Octavian became the emperor that the new Roman Empire needed.

Read More
913 Words | 4 Pages

Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus was a talented soldier who had raised his own army to support Sulla during the civil war, which resulted in outstanding success. Pompey then demanded he be given a triumph for his victory but was refused, being under the age of requirement and without family connections. Pompey decided to then put pressure on Sulla for his triumph and appealed to popular opinion. According to Plutarch he told Sulla “more people worship the rising rather than the setting sun” which indicated that Sulla’s time was coming to an end as Pompey began to rise through the political ladder at a rapid pace. Around this time, the consular armies were faced with military crises.

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

His laws were mostly repealed, making the Roman Republic to be worse off than it was before. Since the Roman Republic could was weak, people like the Triumvirate and later on Caesar dictatorship were able to take control of the Roman Republic. “With simmering unrest, Pompey’s army was used to assassinate those that were enemies of the senate, sulla’s program was overturned so that the tribunes weren’t terminal.” Even though Sulla eventually gave up his power after he restored Republic to his perception of glory, his show of dominance gave rise to more dictators after him. Sulla showed the others after him that being charismatic wasn’t enough to take over the Republic, but showing dominance and one’s vast army made the senate backed down.

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

It seems that the fall of the Roman Republic was not a singular event that occurred instantaneously, but rather a long process that saw the increasing use of methods outside of Republican institutions to settle conflicts between members of the aristocracy over political power. Even as the Roman government transitioned form Kingdom to Republic and then to Empire, the competition between aristocratic families remained a relative constant in across the centuries. So too has the desire to mythologize the past. The romans attributed both the fall of the Kingdom of Rome and the fall of the Roman Republic to moral rot, while a more reasonable assessment might place the blame on a dissatisfied and competitive elite class and an inefficient and unresponsive governmental system that was unwilling or unable to address their concerns. In much the same way, modern observers of the Roman Republic have tended to mythologize the fall of the Republic in the service of creating a moral narrative about the unconscionable tyranny of Cesar and the righteousness of the Senate, or whatever alternative narrative is befitting of the historical moment and audience.

Read More
1608 Words | 7 Pages

Lucius Cornelius Sulla was a prominent figure in the late republic of Ancient Rome, rising to power through establishing allies and his military accomplishments. As a member of the patrician class Sulla rose to power through the Roman political ladder (Cursus Honourum). Sulla was the victor of the social war, conducted war against the Mithridates and headed the first civil war in Roman history against Marius. Through his military accomplishments, he gained support from the senate and was later elected consul and then transitioned into dictatorship. He became a well-known dictator in 82 BC where he established a series of governmental reforms altering Rome’s political system.

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

The senate, aiming to avoid execution, allowed Sulla to become a dictator, an act that was supposed to be only temporary, which gave him permanent immunity from prosecution. Sulla’s career revealed that war went from defending the republic to acquiring wealth and social

Read More
1255 Words | 6 Pages

For starters, he is the reason the Roman Republic fell and the Roman Empire rose. Despite the rise of the empire was a relatively good geographical outcome, the fact that it was governed by a dictatorship, created a few problems. One being that most Romans were not in favor of a monarchical life. But, when he came into power the first thing that he did was make extreme cutbacks on the Senate. This can also be a result of his power thirst.

Read More

More about Sula During The Civil War Essay

Related Topics

Open Document