ipl-logo

Summary: College Athletes Should NOT Be Paid

1721 Words7 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Why collage athletes students shouldn't be paid

"There are hungry nights that I go to bed starving." says Shabazz Napier, a champion basketball player for the University of Connecticut. "There 's hungry nights and I 'm not able to eat and I still got to play up to my capabilities" ("Fox Sports"). Many student athletes share Napier 's struggle. Chris Conley, a football player for the University of Georgia, attests that if he needs clothes or shoes, he has to sacrifice his food money and face going hungry (Aued). One would think that given these unacceptable yet commonplace problems, the universities simply couldn 't afford to help their players obtain basic needs, right? Wrong. In 2013, The University of Georgia had nearly 100 million dollars in revenue, 73.9 million dollars in uncommitted …show more content…

Sports reporter, Kate Murphy, succinctly summarizes an overwhelming standpoint that many people seem to cite in her article "Privilege, not a job: College athletes shouldn 't be paid." First, she stipulates herself that student-athletes technically fit the criteria of hardworking employees. She also acknowledges that it is nearly impossible for athletes to balance a job while adhering to their strict schedules. However, because student-athletes are "living the dream" and are supposed to drink up the passion and sacrifices of their game, seeking compensation is grotesque and un-sportsman like. This argument rides on the coattails of "purity." Because money corrupts, student-athletes shouldn 't expect it or want it and should simply play their game out of love...whilst providing entertainment to the masses and technically earning millions of dollars for TV networks, colleges and the NCAA. While one could argue overly the ludicrous and truly unethical contradictions of the argument "play for free, play for purity," that would dignify the belief that student pensions are the only answer to the current system; which is not true. There are countless flaws with the current system and just as many solutions, only one of which involves universities handing out a biweekly check to their …show more content…

If the NCAA was changed, or even abolished, the universities of today would most likely fix the issue of poor college athletes, whether they meant to or not. Universities are typically unabashed to admit that they are indeed running a businesses. They want elite teams that will not only earn the school a large income, but bring them to bowl games and championships. Colleges would have little to no issue with giving student-athletes the benefits of employees if the realm of collegiate sports became a free market. In fact, such a reform guarantees a competitive market to insure that college-players

Show More
Related
1208 Words | 5 Pages

That was his mother’s entire annual paycheck! The scholarship suddenly seemed like it would be a drop in a basin of debt. Unfortunately, this situation is similar to that of many college athletes,over eighty six percent of who are poverty-stricken, coming from low-income families, and almost all of them are bombarded with high fees. Though they are in dire need of help, the NCAA, otherwise known as the National Collegiate Athletic Association, refuses to aid these athletes, saying that the players should not receive salaries or any other monetary compensation.

Read More
786 Words | 4 Pages

For example, athletes who spend 90 hours a week training and studying will make these players hungry after the university's dining options are closed. In these situations scholarships fail to provide the student athletes with additional dining options. Even some of the textbooks they need have to come out of their own pocket. Since 86% of the college athletes live below the poverty line and the average out of pocket expenses for a college athlete total $3,222, they need money for the out of pocket expenses. To many people, these things seem like a small price to pay for a full scholarship, but it is important to remember that these scholarships are the only way many athletes can make it to

Read More
487 Words | 2 Pages

Most of the money they need has to come from parents because unlike pro athletes who have extra time to work, the collegiate athletes are working on schooling during

Read More
1281 Words | 6 Pages

In fact 86 percent of college athletes live below the poverty line (Hayes, Matt). A lot of college athletes leave college early for the pros for this very reason. You can compare

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

" This quote proves that the students are bringing in lots of money and the school has plenty to give. College athletes should be paid because they contribute to the school revenues. When it comes to getting fans in the arena it all happens because of the stars coming out of the locker room. Student athletes can be looked at as advertisement because they persuade people to come watch their skills.

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.

Read More
1061 Words | 5 Pages

"Over the last decade, the debate of whether or not college athletes should be paid has intensified, and many athletes, as well as coaches, have begun to advocate for the cause." (TIMES) Tyler Harnett, a writer at the Huffington Post, took his standpoint on the topic in the article "Why College Athletes Should be Paid," which clearly states his claim, college athletes should be paid. Personally, I disagree with Harnett's viewpoint and I don't believe college athletes should be paid due to education, funding, and overall fairness. To summarize Harnett's article, he starts by talking about his opponents and their viewpoints on the situation, "They are already getting a scholarship, don't be greedy."

Read More
1272 Words | 6 Pages

If education is the purpose of college the NCAA should have no problem providing education to all of their athletes even after they are injured. And when they are injured the NCAA should be held responsible for the injuries incred from the time played in college athletics. Students are being punished for playing in college being forced to cover their medical cost and the cost of their college if losing the scholarship due to their sports related injuries. Unions would also evolve the sport to the next level. Allowing players to be more involved in how the game functions and the fine details of the game will allow both players coaches and NCAA officials to

Read More
628 Words | 3 Pages

Think about it this way, what two sports generate the most money from viewership and merchandise? That would be football and basketball; those two sports make most of the money for the “non-profit” NCAA. Why should these sports be paid more than say women's soccer, or a men's lacrosse team? At the same time why do these smaller and less popular sports, by general viewership, deserve as much of a cut as the sports who bring in all of the dough. At this current time in history, the last thing we need as a society is to create discrimination among the sexes or destroy the comradery that college athletes share amongst each

Read More
1317 Words | 6 Pages

College athletes take many risks and make personal sacrifices in order to bring in revenue for their school, for this reason, they should be paid employees. The first reason in why college athletes should be paid is that college athletes take many risks. Depending on the scholarship, if an athlete is injured and unable to play they can lose their

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

For example, if it wasn’t for basketball players, Gonzaga University would need to spend a lot more money on building a name recognition to students not located on the West. Everyone has their own opinion, but mine is that college athletes should be paid. The amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school are only three of a myriad of reasons why they should be paid. These athletes are not only students, but employees to their universities. They are a core member of many university’s marketing team.

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.

Read More
1489 Words | 6 Pages

When student-athletes received full scholarships, they should be privileged and thankful since the cost of higher education is very expensive. Student-athletes need to understand the circumstances and take of advantage of getting their degree from a well renowned university since the percentages are very slim to none on having a professional career in sports. The purpose of a student-athlete is to be a student first and then an athlete second. The main focus should be on earning a degree, and not worrying about when is the next game on the schedule. Many people are stating that college athletes should get paid, but how about the general student body that has little to nothing and working a job earning minimal pay.

Read More
888 Words | 4 Pages

Athletes who get scholarships don’t have to deal or worry about student loans, paying for textbooks, the cost of campus living, and meal plans.(3) Students who get scholarships don’t have to worry about being in debt because of loans because their college education is paid off from the scholarship. Then in the state of Pennsylvania 71 percent of students leave a public four year institution in debt around $32,528.(3) This is a normal person graduating from a college. They have to worry about paying back all of that money and students who get scholarships don’t have to worry about it.

Read More

More about Summary: College Athletes Should NOT Be Paid

Open Document