In the article, “Minimum Wage Hikes Hurt Low-Income Workers,” Jame Sherk debates how an increase in the minimum wage would impact workers and corporations. Sherk builds his argument by first explaining the recent history of an increasing minimum wage and how much it has risen. Following, he argues why it would hurt businesses and low-income workers. Lastly, after illustrating the consequences, he offers statistical evidence to support his claim and to prove to the reader why the hike would only hurt both businesses and low-income workers. Sherk’s use of evidence and explanation offers a strong argument and a clear stance.
A recent study involving three hundred fifty thousand small businesses and the IRS proved that by raising the minimum wage, proved that by raising the minimum wage in cities, actually created jobs (Meyerson A.19). The survey showed that the cities with a higher minimum wage had more jobs come to the area, aiding in job growth (Meyerson A.19). Another argument that leans toward the raising of the minimum wage involves people in poverty. Studies have shown that by raising the minimum wage, more people can live above the poverty line (Meyerson A.19). By raising the minimum over nine hundred thousand people would be
Essentially, Washington D.C. was one of the cities that established raised wages. In Jason Russell’s article, D.C. Lost Restaurant Jobs After Min. Wage Hike, he describes the repercussions placed on employees once the minimum wage was raised. Russell explains that after Washington D.C.’s minimum wage rose to $10.50 an hour in 2015, increases in restaurant jobs failed to keep up with the quick growth it carried during the economic recovery and further explains how restaurant jobs fell by 1,400 in D.C. (Russell 1).
Raising the minimum wage has been one of the biggest debates during the 21st century. One side of the spectrum argues that raising it will make it so they have a living wage, while the other argues that raising it will hurt the economy. Whichever the case is, people are clearly divided on this issue. Before Oregon passed the 15 dollar minimum wage law, people wrote arguments to try to either prevent or pass this law. The article, “How a $15 minimum wage would affect a real business: Guest opinion” by Lee Spector argues that raising the minimum wage would hurt small businesses like the one he earns.
Minimum wage would raise the wages of many workers and increment benefits what disadvantaged workers. An estimated 6.9 million workers would receive an incrementation in their hourly wage if the minimum rage were raised to $10.15 by 2015. Due to the spill over effect the 10.5 million workers earning up to a dollar above minimum wage would withal be liable to benefit from an incrementation. Women are the most astronomically immense group of beneficiaries from a minimum wage increase. Sixty percent of workers who would benefit from an incrementation are women.
They said that they are not able to raise their prices to afford this and cover their expenses. Also, they state that they have reduce the amount of the minimum wage employees or reduce their work hours which will effect both the owners and employees negatively. Furthermore, raising the minimum wage will effect economic negatively. The economists concluded that as a result of the wage increase, "many prices will increase, including those that lower-income households commonly face; wages will raise for those in minimum wage jobs that remain employed; employment opportunities for those at the bottom of the skills ladder will be diminished and employment growth will
One of the elasticity conditions that make the statement about increasing the minimum wage resulting in less employment for employees who now earn less than the minimum wage is the price inelastic condition which states "...when demand is price inelastic, a given percentage change in price in a smaller percentage change in quantity demanded" (Rittenberg and Tregarthen, 2013, p. 116). The reason this elasticity condition rings true is because the total percentage change in the revenue of the minimum wage workers would still rise if there is a smaller percentage change of under minimum wage workers that were to be unemployed than the percentage of the wage increase. The second elasticity condition that would make the statement
A minimum wage increase from “$7.25 to $10.10 would result in a loss of 500,000 jobs”. ("The Effects of Minimum-Wage Increase on Employment and Family Income”) This claim is better because it shows how raising the minimum wage will decrease job growth instead of increasing it. But, the minimum wage should be increased because increasing will also increase economic activity and spur job growth, decrease poverty, and improvements in productivity and economic growth have outpaced increases in the minimum
And on April 1, 1991, the minimum wage hit an all-time high of $4.25 an hour as explained by Lawrence Katz (6). In his findings regarding his article, Lawrence Katz states that "the evidence on employment and price changes does not seem consistent with a conventional view of the effects of increases in a binding minimum wage” (20). By this, Katz is trying to state that even though the minimum wage increased in the early 1990s, the increase had an adverse effect in which employment to the fast food industry increased in Texas, where he conducted his research. He also concluded that the changing in prices in the businesses he researched were not directly associated the minimum wage increase. Looking back at this research, it seems as though the constant increases in the minimum wage shows how strong our economy has become.
One of the greatest effects of a $15 an hour minimum wage would be its impact on
(Card and Kreuger 1995, p. 593) This finding shows that the minimum wages fail to reduce poverty because many poor Americans do not work. Also, this increase would not be well targeted at low income households, and would only influence negligible effects on the income inequality. All these evidence suggest that the minimum wage increases do not reduce
If America raises the minimum wage to $9.00, it will help people in need or in poverty, but it also won’t hurt people in the workforce. If you increase the minimum wage to $15.00 it will make unemployment rates go high up. Which in the process, makes the homelessness rates go up in the country and in your community. If you keep the minimum wage at $7.25 people will stay in poverty and homeless or on the verge of homelessness.
America today is faced with its fair share of problems. There are low employment rates, debt, and inflation everywhere, riddling the economy with issues. There is absolutely no reason that any American citizen should want to pile upon the problem. Yet, some believe that it could be done by raising the federal minimum wage to fifteen dollars an hour. Fortunately, history, economics, and common sense prove the minimum wage raise proposition wrong.
Minimum wage Minimum wage in America is poverty it creates a wage lower than the living wage. It 's only backbone of support is social welfare and the affordable care act medicaid and obama care so people who have low wage paying jobs and minimum wage has to rely on taxpayers and the government to pay with their subsidizes, Because social welfare no longer becomes support but becomes a lifestyle. Minimum wage is set by the Department of labor, and fair labor standards act they set a minimum wage and a overtime pay. Why isn 't minimum wage raised to living wage or out of poverty level? Because if minimum wage goes up so does the prices of goods.
In 1994, labor economists David Card and Alan Krueger compared the rates of employment in New Jersey 's fast-food industry before and after a statewide increase in the minimum wage. The study found minimal impact on employment. "The weight of this evidence," Card and Krueger wrote in their 1995 book Myth and Measurement: The New Economics of Minimum Wage, "suggests that it is very unlikely that the minimum wage has a large, negative employment