Summary Of A Day Without A Woman By Dana Milbank

853 Words4 Pages

“In the Trump administration, it’s always ‘A Day Without a Woman,’” written by Dana Milbank discusses the Trump administration's treatment towards women. Milbank argues that President Trump and his administration do not respect women and their deserved rights as much as they should. Milbank furthers his claim by providing defunding Planned Parenthood as his evidence. Milbank states that Planned Parenthood — “the nation’s largest provider of health services for women” — was defunded on International Women’s Day, the eighth day of Women’s History Month, and therefore proves that Trump is ignorant of women’s needs nationwide. To further his argument, Milbank mocks President Trump by stating “what better time to make this dream come true than on …show more content…

Milbank provides statistical evidence asserting that there are not many women in leadership positions in Trump’s Cabinet. He states, “A USA Today analysis last month found that men outnumbered women by more than 2 to 1 among top White House aides. Trump named only four women to his Cabinet, the fewest in a generation, and none to the top jobs at the State, Treasury Defense and Justice Departments.” By providing a statistic from a well known, credible source such as USA Today, Milbank establishes credibility and provides strong evidence to support his claim that President Trump does not have as many women in his administration compared to the male population. In fact, the women appointed in his administration do not acquire any authoritative positions which is shocking when accounting for the fact that Trump administration has the fewest women in office in a single generation. Milbank convinces the reader in believing that Trump has not incorporated more women in his administration, especially after Trump believes, according to his tweet: “women as vital to the fabric of our society.” Milbank provides evidence from multiple occasions where Trump ignores to acknowledge women, for example when he recently “welcomed the governors ‘and their wives and daughters,’ as if no women were governors.” As a result, he builds a strong argument overall to persuade the reader that Trump’s administration lacks a well balanced incorporation of women in office. Overall, Milbank’s argument is not easily weakened by some of the fallacies present in his introductory