A revolutionary activist, a Founding Father, Thomas Paine wrote the “Age of Reason” to expose Christianity as a fraud and its inconsistencies. His critique against religion were based not religion itself, but its medium of dissemination. He disputed the authority and disbelieved the authorship of the Bible. Through reasoning and ethical concentration, he criticized the composition of God’s word and used the internal evidence of the Bible to reveal its flaws. Paine’s “Age of Reason” is an examination of how well individuals can recognize the insights of close textual analysis to a book to which may contain an emotional attachment. Paine’s arguments focused on the first close textual study of the Bible, the fundamental authority of Protestantism. The historical books were subject to critical and logical analysis to sway of the true theology, Deism.
The solid belief that the Bible is
…show more content…
However, Thomas Paine’s judgment on religion contrasts, and did not truly agree about the authenticity of the Bible, God had to be universal and therefore not contextualized. His argument leaned towards what he believed and what he trusted with evidences along with reasoning. What he demonstrated was that emotional attachment may be misplaced, the individuals who read the Bible might recognize the insights and never doubt. For instance, traditional belief says that Moses wrote the first five books of the Bible. Paine’s arguments derived from logical events, and believed he could dismantle biblical authorship, how Moses could not have been the author of the Torah because the funeral records. What he found was not only that Moses could not possibly have written these, internal evidence shows they were composed centuries later, but also argues that there are multiple authors. Hence the authority his