ipl-logo

Summary Of Andrew Carnegie's Life Of The Average Coal Miner

508 Words3 Pages

Andrew Carnegie’s views are ethical when corresponding to The Life of the Average Coal Miner because the power of wealth is strong enough to fix issues that affect those in desperate need. Andrew Carnegie can relate to the struggles faced by the poor and as well as the rich because of his childhood. A twelve-year-old boy should not have the responsibility to wake up in the early morning and worry for his health that is at risk in a dangerous working environment. His ambition should not be to go from passing his arms over steaming, hot coal to opening and closing car doors for no more than $1.30 a day. No child should have to put up with the poor conditions of working and risking even the smallest scratch on their small, preadolescent hand. Carnegie revealed that the true dilemma being faced is how people in society manage their wealth. He claims that the best thing to do is to spend your fortune wisely and provide to those who are willing to help themselves get out of any financial issues they may face. This is much more than ethical because helping someone, other than yourself, is morally right. If an affluent man had great pride in his earnings, he should …show more content…

If we unite as one to help one another in hard times, we can accomplish so much more and at a much more rapid pace. Carnegie is encouraging a diversity-free society. No labeling of “poor” and “rich.” Just a society who came together for the better of the United States. If the avoidance of handling your money responsibly occurs, then this goes to show the betrayal and lack of commitment you carry for your country. If wealthy men could help the less fortunate, our country could easily become a better place. Families will be at a much more comfortable financial setting, the amount of young children working in bizarre conditions would decrease, and our society would be, not the same, but nearly the same as how it used to

Show More
Related

George Mcneil And Andrew Carnegie: A Comparative Analysis

105 Words | 1 Pages

According to Andrew Carnegie, men of wealth should have to provide for the less fortunate and should set a good example. The men have to provide all the necessities for his family. Also the men of wealth had to give back to the community.

Read More

Comparison Of Andrew Carnegie And Samuel Gomper In The Gospel Of Wealth

476 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Carnegie and Samuel Gomper have different takes when it comes to the role that wealthy people should have in society. The two authors have opposed feelings toward the poor people being in the state of condition that they are in. Although their views are different what they are proposing in both documents can help the poor people. Carnegie’s The Gospel of Wealth focus more on what the wealthy people should do with their wealth to benefit the society.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Robber Barons

1093 Words | 5 Pages

The captains of industry believed that the poor people were inferior to the rich people. The rich were superior because they had “wisdom, experience, and the ability to administer”. The duty of a rich person was to help out a poor person which was what was said in the Gospel of Wealth. The Gospel of Wealth is about how the rich person's responsibility is philanthropy. Carnegie believes in charity work so he would donate to libraries, and universities and schools and etc.

Read More

Robber Barons: Captains Of Industry During The Gilded Age

1406 Words | 6 Pages

Carnegie used the tactic of vertical integration to gain control of anything related to the production of steel, including railroads and iron mines, in order to reduce his costs and produce steel cheaper. Although this is a tactic related to the idea of social darwinism, compared to horizontal integration used by Rockefeller, it is a fair way to gain an advantage over one’s competitors. In his essay, Wealth, Carnegie strongly supports the impact of social darwinism stating that “it insures the survival of the fittest” in every aspect of industry (Doc 3). His support for social darwinist tactics is demonstrated through his rise to industrial power, but is also combatted through his attention to philanthropy. Andrew Carnegie stated that the wealthy have responsibility to give back to society through donations to libraries, universities, and other intellectual institutes which is fulfilled in the later years of his reign when he sold his company to rival J.P. Morgan and used his fortune for the greater good.

Read More

Summary Of Andrew Carnegie's Wealth

1191 Words | 5 Pages

Carnegie could have discussed the reservations the poor had about the ability of some to become rich through industrialization and how they felt about his Gospel of Wealth. Did the poor really want money from the rich, who had control of many forces throughout the nation? Carnegie fails to provide a bias opinion on the divide between the rich and the poor because he is no longer poor. He expresses the faults in the wealthy hoarding their money for themselves, but continues to believe the wealthy should exist. The classifications of rich and poor also goes against Carnegie’s belief that the American society was changing into something new, when in reality they were adopting some of the old colonial ways like

Read More

Was Andrew Carnegie Accountable For Coal Workers?

434 Words | 2 Pages

2) Andrew Carnegie doesn’t seem to take into account the details of extreme poverty that coal miners have. His views aren’t ethical because he thinks that it should be easy for everyone to succeed like he did but there’s much more to it. Although both Carnegie and the miners were very dedicated in their jobs, one man worked awfully more for less than the other. Coal miners are in intense risk every day to be able to provide the family with about $1.60 a day.

Read More

Carnegie Vs Relativism

166 Words | 1 Pages

Carnegie thinks it is better to build public institutions than give charity to the poor because the poor need to have the “desire to improve” and find help in these public institutions. (Carnegie 30). He believes that rather wealthy “Men who continue hoarding great sums all their lives” can find the proper use for their money, which is to help the community. (Carnegie 29). By just giving money to the poor the wealthy are doing all their work and instead the poor should find the assistance they need to improve their lives.

Read More

Testimonials In The Gilded Age

950 Words | 4 Pages

Andrew Carnegie was the founder of the largest steel company. Carnegie grew in a poor community but then migrated to Western Pennsylvania just to completely make a change in his life and later on being recognized as one of the wealthiest people in that era. In Carnegie’s testimonial, The Gospel of Wealth, we can observe his way of thinking in regards of the benefits farmers got from the rich people. Carnegie said that “Today the world obtains commodities of excellent quality at prices which even the preceding generation would have deemed incredible…” (Carnegie). He explained that there is no reason for others to criticize the privileges rich people get in comparison to those farmers get being that, farmers and poor people have now better opportunities than they had before, “The poor enjoy what the rich could not before afford.

Read More

Gilded Age Dbq

1701 Words | 7 Pages

He also conveys that companies should be helping support communities that they are near to. Gompers also insist on the right to organize and that workers deserve to be paid adequate wages in that law should be passed to help with workers compensation. The financial cloud of railroads left employees helpless in many ways. Document E by Andrew Carnegie called "Wealth" explains how some business leaders believed in charity but also saw themselves as Superior compared to the common human. This shows how Business Leaders were not very humble and not often remembered where they came from and how they were once in the same position as these people that they are treating so unfairly.

Read More

Andrew Carnegie Dbq

572 Words | 3 Pages

As the document B provide us with a review of North America Review, June 1889 titled “Wealth” by Andrew Carnegie. In this document we can analyze the ways of how wealth is disposed the first is keep it for your descendants, being this a wrong way to educate your children giving wealth without having worked to achieved, the second way is the leaving it for public uses after your death, but he criticized this by “Why should a man wait until his dead before he becomes of much good in the world?”, and the last one is the one he praise of set an example of “modest, living and to produce the most beneficial result for the community” By this he explain and implement a new model of use of wealth in the world for the common good making donations and improving

Read More

Underpinnings And Effectiveness Of Carnegie's Gospel Of Wealth

605 Words | 3 Pages

Underpinnings and Effectiveness of Carnegie’s “Gospel of Wealth” In Andrew Carnegie’s “Gospel of Wealth”, Carnegie proposed a system of which he thought was best to dispose of “surplus wealth” through progress of the nation. Carnegie wanted to create opportunities for people “lift themselves up” rather than directly give money to these people. This was because he considered that giving money to these people would be “improper spending”.

Read More

Gilded Age Dbq

1015 Words | 5 Pages

Carnegie states in his review, “Wealth”, “--the man of wealth thus becoming the mere agent and trustee for his poorer brethren, bringing to their service his superior wisdom, experience, and ability to administer, doing for them better than they would or could do for themselves,” (Carnegie, Doc. 4). Carnegie believes that those who are wealthy should use himself to help the community, but deserves those votes in return. They can build a loyal voter following, especially among immigrant groups, by performing such favors as providing jobs or housing. However, in the end, the political machines want loyalty at the voting polls.

Read More

Andrew Carnegie And The Workers During The Gilded Age

501 Words | 3 Pages

During the Gilded Age, Andrew Carnegie and the miners were part of the industrial core of U.S. history, as both played a key role in developing the country's economy, albeit in different ways. Also, Carnegie saw fortune as an important part of the capitalist system. The Gospel of Wealth has epitomized the perception of Carnegie concerning wealth and poverty because he strongly feels that it is the duty of the affluent to give a part of their excess wealth back to society in such a way as would help improve welfare and advancement. The problem of our age is the proper administration of wealth, so that the ties of brotherhood may still bind together the rich and poor in a harmonious relationship (Carnegie). Gospel of Wealth -.

Read More

Analysis Of Andrew Carnegie's The Gospel Of Wealth

835 Words | 4 Pages

He believed that if the wealthy don't give back some of their profits to the community, they are living a dishonorable life, and although I didn't necessarily agree with this radical viewpoint at first, I now am a firm believer in Carnegie's argument about wealth.

Read More

Andrew Carnegie Is Not A Hero Essay

454 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Carnegie could have let his employees keep their wages and worry about donations later. Taking money away to invest it somewhere else is not helping, because the people

Read More

More about Summary Of Andrew Carnegie's Life Of The Average Coal Miner

Open Document