More handpicked essays just for you.
The boston massacre 6th grade essay
The boston massacre 6th grade essay
Was the boston massacre really a massacre? three reasons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The boston massacre 6th grade essay
This is Miss.Cruz reporting live from Boston ,Massachusetts on March 5,1770 ! Leading up to this ground breaking event, was the cruel treatment to the Colonials. After the French and Indian War the British was in deep debt. So the British put a bunch of Acts and agreement on the Colonials to get back money. The Townshend Act was the biggest act to get Colonists to cover debt.
View the image by Paul Revere about the Boston Massacre. If you were a historian, how would you criticize this version of the conflict? What evidence is there to support it? If I were a historian viewing this image in conjunction with our text, I would call this version of the conflict Patriot Propaganda.
After the French and Indian war, Britain was in heavy debt and needed to acquire as much revenue as possible. Britain was so desperate for money, they did not care how they received the money and whose rights they violated in the process. Because of this unjust mindset, Britain was not merciful when creating ways to collect revenue. The British methods for acquiring money were purposeful but not just.
On March 5, 1770, five people died at the hands of British soldiers in Boston, Massachusetts. Based on an analysis of the eyewitness testimonies, medical examiner’s reports, and the crime scene, it was determined that the soldiers did not commit murder, but rather acted in self-defense. Many eyewitness testimonies clearly describe the mob as threatening to the point where the soldiers felt they were in danger. Dr. John Jeffries, the surgeon attending to Patrick Carr, who died during the incident, states that Carr said the soldier who shot him “had no malice, but fired to defend himself.”
At the dawn of the 1770s, American colonial resentment of the British Parliament in London had been steadily increasing for some time. Retaliating in 1766, Parliament issued the Declaratory Act which repealed most taxes except issued a reinforcement of Parliament’s supremacy. In a fascinating exchange, we see that the Parliament identifies and responds to the colonists main claim; Parliament had no right to directly tax colonists who had no representation in Parliament itself. By asserting Parliamentary supremacy while simultaneously repealing the Stamp Act and scaling back the Sugar Act, Parliament essentially established the hill it would die on, that being its legitimacy. With the stage set for colonial conflict in the 1770s, all but one
Many Americans and British have different opinions on what went on and who was right in the American Revolution. Americans thought they were right and so did the British. The American Revolution went on from 1775 to 1783. The very first battle, Lexington and Concord, was “a shot heard around the world.” Coming back to our opinions, were the American colonists justified to break off of Britain?
In debate Darla Davis discusses the Taxes imposed on the American Colonists by Parliament. First not everyone in parliament believe that taxation of the colonies was right thing to do. According to Darla’s Article, Will Pitt and Edmund Burke, were two members of the parliament that under stood why the colonist were opposing the tax. Colonist were opposing men felt that the opposition from the colonists concerning the taxes existed, because the colonist had been practically ignored by England since having been established.
I think that the British soldiers acted in self defense during the Boston Massacre. The colonists were threatening and provoking the soldiers by shouting vulgarly, beating people with clubs, and throwing rocks covered in snow, so I believe that the soldiers had a right to fight for their lives. Just take a moment to imagine the Boston massacre, it’s late at night and people are tired and confused. The colonists are shouting “Fire and be damned, who cares! Damn you, you dare not fire,” (Exhibit B) and the British soldiers are ready to defend but don’t know what’s going on.
In 1767, the British Parliament passed the "Townshend Acts", the North American colonies of a variety of imported goods (glass, lead Dan, lead white, paint, paper and tea) tax. Colonial residents responded with violent demonstrations- one of the riots that led to the Boston massacre- and the boycott of the British goods again. In 1770 the British abolished all taxes except the tea tax; the retention of the tea tax was a symbol of the British taxation of the North American colonies. 1773 British Parliament passed the "Tea Act", abolished the England tea import tax, but retained the North American colonies. This practice angered the North American patriots, they will be three British merchant loaded with tea poured into the Boston Port, Known
I actually didn’t know that Paul Revere was only one of many messengers who alerted the minutemen that the British troops were coming in, I only remember the story of Paul Revere himself warning them, but it again created a good story and would be inspiring. I also wasn’t aware that the Boston Massacre was really an unfortunate mishap, or that Reveres rendition of it that spread in print throughout the colonies, was false and misleading (“Boston, Bloody Boston: The Revolution”). Presenting a martyr figure in Crispus Attucks would also have roused the rebels, it was very clever. That brings me to one of my biggest surprises, just how significant the role of print and propaganda was in its impact on furthering and increasing rebellion, leading
The Boston Massacre is an event most Americans and British students learn about over the course of their education. In America, we learn that British soldiers fired upon innocent civilians, although this may not have been the case. British historians have referred to the Boston Massacre as the "Incident on King Street". After looking over the "Captain Thomas Preston 's Account of the Boston Massacre", as well as "Boston Massacre Trial Depositions" I believe that American historians should refer to the "Boston Massacre" as the "Incident on King Street". The definition of a massacre refers to an unnecessary and random killing of a large number of individuals.
The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a “patriot”. They were throwing sticks, snowballs, and trash at a group of British troops. The loyalists got very annoyed with the patriots so they shot into the mob killing five. The riot began when around 50 colonists attacked a British sentinel. A British officer called in for additional troops
“No taxation without representation.” In 1776, the British parliamentary system had many corrupt politicians that had extremely small electorates, with sometimes less than 100 voters having a say over who gets elected to parliament. In this respect, the British Parliament in 1776 was an extremely unrepresentative body by modern standards, regardless of whether you were a politician or a colonist in America. If the elites with the power in the British Parliament weren 't going to give proportional representation to politicians inside Britain, they certainly weren 't going to give it to some rebellious, self-reliant, upstart colonists thousands of miles away. American colonists believed that a representative assembly should mirror its
This is usually taught from the perspective of the colonists, and fails to shed light on the British perspective. Students should study why the colonists were paying taxes, how the British government assisted the colonists with their expansion, and compare the colonists’ taxes to those of the British citizens. This discussion will lead into the issue of “no taxation without representation”, and this should be compared to the representation that British citizens were receiving in Great Britain. William McCorkle brought up an excellent topic at the end of the section covering the issues of oppression and taxation when he wrote, “The teacher could also have the class discuss the question of whether giving the United States more representation in Parliament would have actually stopped the Revolution or whether that was merely a pretense to rebel” (McCorkle, 2020, p.4).
There were many disagreements and because of those, many events were the cause of the American Revolution. These events included bloodshed by others, peoples rights weren’t enforced, individuals didn’t receive freedom, and our country was just not yet whole. Despite of the causes of why the road to Revolution took place there were effects afterwards. When American Revolution was over with the The Declaration of Independence came into place, treaties were signed, and the Bill of Rights. Now these effects/events were amazing, it helped our country tremendously.
