of social control. Modern understanding, terms, and science may help to simplify the complexity of human sexuality but also in this complexity creates boxes for in which people do not fit. These theories relate to the critical sexuality studies because it allows for the idea that human sexuality is more complex than the categories people place it in. The unique analysis this theory gives is that sexuality can only be understood on an individual basis, because social categories and scientific understanding cannot completely define it.
“Because the binaries are revealed to be cultural constructions or ideological fictions, the reality of sexed bodies and gender and sexual identities are fraught with incoherence and instability. In other words,
…show more content…
The reason I really enjoyed this piece is because it argues against the fact that gender is predetermined. This theory of gender predetermination is called brain organization theory. “The idea that men and women act differently because they have distinctly male or female brains-,” (Jordan-Young, 2010). She disagrees with the idea that gender is predetermined by the hormones fetuses are exposed to in the womb. The theory she is against states that gender is created by these hormones because this hormone exposure leads to certain masculine and feminine differences in brain structure. This leads to different patterns, behaviors, and desires. There are many things I agree with her in her critique on of the idea of predetermined gender and sexual orientation. I think the easiest part to understand through a sociological lens is the fact that the scientists are confusing sex and gender. They believe that someone’s sex and the hormones they were exposed to, determine the gender they identify with and their sexual orientation. The author illuminates the social construction of sex and sexuality by stating that the sex/gender system, “-is a social effect, rather that the result of human biology,”