ipl-logo

Summary Of David Hume's Dialogues All The Way Down

1339 Words6 Pages

Ellie Lawler Dr. Patrick Gamez PHIL 20101-09 27 October 2016 Turtles All The Way Down David Hume, a philosopher in the 18th century, wrote Dialogues on Natural Religion, in which three characters who agree on the existence of a God, debate the nature of that God’s existence. The three characters, Cleanthes, Philo, and Demea, have very different ideas on the nature and characteristics of God. Part 4 of the Dialogues focuses on the latter two. Cleanthes believes in an anthropomorphic God and is a proponent of the teleological argument, or that of God as an intelligent designer. Philo asserts that the human mind is incapable of making any assumptions about God as a divine being either through a priori thought or through lived experiences, but …show more content…

In doing this, he is attempting to explain how the universe came to be ordered in the way that it is. He compares the world to a book or a machine, pointing out that these things must be created by a rational mind, and therefore more complex things, such as nature, should also require a rational mind as a creator. He describes this rational mind, God, as an anthropomorphic being, or human-like. This human-like God who intelligently designed the world with an inherent order would be like an architect who designs a building. While this appeared to be a strong argument explaining the order in the world, Philo responded with the idea that an intelligent designer would imply that the universe is no more or less ordered than it would be if there was no God at all. The thoughts and designs pertaining to the building do not construct the building. Furthermore, Philo asserts, “a mental world or universe of ideas requires a cause as much as does a material world or universe of objects” (Hume 37). In other words, the existence of an intelligent designer does not necessarily explain how the world came to exist nor does it explain the cause of the order in the world. There has merely been a shift from the material realm into ideas. To find the cause of the world, we must find the cause of God’s thoughts. In the words of Philo, “How therefore shall we satisfy ourselves concerning the …show more content…

Philo cannot be content with an argument that is potentially flawed, which is why he goes on to say, “Why not stop at the material world? How can we satisfy ourselves without going on in infinitum? And after all, what satisfaction is there in that infinite progression?” (Hume 38). With this, he is saying that if we can prove that God exists and is the cause of the world as we experience it, why wouldn’t we go further back and investigate previous causes? At the same time, he knows that it is impossible to investigate those causes through reason or through experience. Philo is saying that it is not a fulfilling experience to look into something that will never have a definitive

Show More
Related
784 Words | 4 Pages

The conclusion, thus, is that Nature was created by intelligent design. This argument is the centerpiece of Paley’s “Argument from Design”, as he spends the previous two sections deliberately lining the specifics of a watch, the clear order a watch follows, and that there must be a creator for a watch. In this section, he puts forward an analogy that nature is like a watch in that both have specific orders and contrivances which thus mean that both were created by an intelligent

Read More
829 Words | 4 Pages

Hambourger’s argument from design argues for the existence of god based on the perceived evidence of deliberate design in the world/universe. To further elaborate on the concepts he uses, Hambourger uses three main concepts; determinism, chance, and mere hap. Hambourger’s argument from design claims that though many things occur by chance, there are some things which we cannot simply accept to have happened by chance, and must therefore have some common explanation in the causal chain of events connecting the two events. For instance the universe is created by many states of affairs coming together. If some slight changes had occurred, the end result could have been vastly different than it currently is.

Read More
739 Words | 3 Pages

He introduces the idea with a game, a simple wager of " heads or tails". However, in his game, one side of the coin represents the belief that God exist, while the other means that God does not exist. What we bet on in Pascal's Wager is also more than your ordinary school yard gamble with higher stake. In this wager, betting our entire lives, as well as the infinite beyond which we live on this

Read More
993 Words | 4 Pages

Of course Phil does not exist in a literal sense, but he is alive and well as he embodies the form (?) of corporate America. This article perhaps serves as a warning to the many corporate leaders and drones, as to no become pitiful, condemned

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

Therefore, although in Genesis man had been a part of God 's plan of creation, God knew to create them in an image of himself. But, in The Oration on the Dignity of Man, Mirandola 's, "Mightiest Architect," (1) did not share this ease in forming man. This is a result of man not being part of God 's original plan, so nothing had been processed in relation to human creation. While observing the world and all he had adorned it with, God, "…still longed for some creature which might comprehend the meaning of so vast an achievement, which

Read More
272 Words | 2 Pages

Paley’s Problem with Purpose In The Evidence of Design William Paley delivers a teleological argument. He claims the cosmos are aligned in a systematic order, which leads to the conclusion that an almighty deity is responsible for creation. He begins by visualizing an analogy of a rock and watch that are lain on the ground. When found, one may assume that the rock has been there forever, but it would be ignorant to claim the same about the watch.

Read More
819 Words | 4 Pages

It would be unreasonable to explain the watch in terms of natural accidents and coincidences. But nature is even more marvelous in the intricacies of its workings than a watch is. The human heart pumps blood at exactly the right pressure to sustain human life; the planets move in their orbits with absolute mathematical precision; each plant is in nearly perfect harmony with its environment. In summary, the universe is such an intricate system of balanced mechanisms that it can be explained only in terms of the purposes and intentions of an intelligent creator, as in the case of the watch. In the case of the universe, that intelligent creator is God."

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

A Response to Philonous’s Argument for the Existence of God In the book “Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous” (1713) George Berkeley uses the dialogue between fictional characters Philonous and Hylas to articulate his argument against atheism. He begins this argument by asserting that his view on idealism—which asserts that reality exists solely in the mind and its ideas— “is enough to overthrow the whole system of atheism” (30). While denying atheism, Berkeley simultaneously makes an argument in favor of the existence of God.

Read More
592 Words | 3 Pages

Explain. Philo believes that because a complete suspension of judgement is impossible, it is presumed that the quarrel over the design argument between the theist and atheist is all verbal dispute. In the book, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion written by David Hume and edited by Richard H. Popkin, Philo argues that the theist and the atheist are merely quarreling over words and that there is no meaningful difference between their positions because there will never be any right argument simply because words are all defined differently, especially between two different belief systems of a theist and an atheist. For example, what is beauty in a humanistic sense that we can visibly see? What is beauty in

Read More
233 Words | 1 Pages

Secondly, that by assuming nature is imperfect, we can assume that there is an imperfect creative process. From this conclusion Philo says we can leave out the idea of a perfect creator. Lastly he criticizes Cleanthes for his analogical and anthropomorphic aspects in his arguments,

Read More
846 Words | 4 Pages

It basically just throws God in without even talking about him. The argument does a great job at showing that there is a creator, but does nothing to explain about God. Once you believe that there is a designer then it opens up many doors by diving into the topic of God and maybe doing research. What makes more sense to believe in God is actually trying to learn about God. If you learn about the Judeo-Christian God, you’ll find out that he wants to be known.

Read More
638 Words | 3 Pages

Hume has failed to take a few things into account. The first of this would be concerning reasoning backing up your morality. As we all have grownup, we are often told to not do things such as do not smoke or do not steal etc and when we ask why not to, we are told simply because it is bad. For those people who remain in question about why smoking is bad and who are maybe standing on the fence between doing it and not doing it is where I feel reason comes into play. We are then shown facts that say “Smoking is bad because x…y…z…” which then solidify our reasoning and backs up our morality.

Read More
599 Words | 3 Pages

St. Thomas Aquinas wrote five arguments for the existence of God, part of his Summa Theologiae. Thomas’ second argument for the existence of God is one of the most compelling, as we can see examples from both the Bible and nature to support it. In the cause and effect argument, Thomas starts off with providing reason that all things that exist in the world must have an original cause to all the effects we see on earth. Thomas states, “There is no case known in which a thing is found to be the efficient cause of itself” (Summa Theologiae I 2:3).Thomas is proving that nothing in nature exists without having a cause, and therefore it is impossible for something to exist in nature without something, the effect, prior to it causing it to exist. The bird, the effect, that flies around your backyard was created by two prior birds, the cause, before that one, and you can keep tracing the cause of each bird back far enough when

Read More
1087 Words | 5 Pages

Philo trusted it was a background marked by his kin and God that requested the peruser to play out a figurative translation. Rationality was an essential part of Philo's line of reasoning, turning into an apparatus with which he built up a clearer translation of the philosophy that both he and his precursors had been a piece of for a few centuries. Amid a symbolic perusing of the Septuagint, Philo's central elucidation was that Hebraic Scriptures and Greek reasoning were perfect, as well as uncovered the predominance of Jewish morals. For Philo did not trust that every one of the stories in the Septuagint were truly genuine, however were built in an indistinguishable way from Greek messages, for example, The Iliad and The

Read More
925 Words | 4 Pages

Hume’s response to this is through is character Philo, Philo said that we should not judge the attributes of god on something like Paley proposes. Philo argues that we cannot judge the entirety of the universe on one single part of nature because nature has an infinite number of springs of principle. Also that we cannot base God on our

Read More

More about Summary Of David Hume's Dialogues All The Way Down

Open Document