ipl-logo

Summary Of Don T Drink The Water By Dave Matthews

617 Words3 Pages

The song “Don’t Drink the Water”, by Dave Matthews can be viewed as reflecting a common theme during the late 1800s and early 1900s; Native Americans being forced to give up and move off of their land. Although this idea reflects the reality of what happened during this time period, it does not accurately reflect the two land policies that the US government passed regarding settlers in the West. The first of these two acts, the Homestead Act, gave settlers 160 acres of public land in exchange for a small filing fee and the promise to live on the land for at least five years. Or, the settlers could buy the land from the government for $1.25 an acre after living on it for six months. Thousands of people took advantage of this act, including many exodusters, or …show more content…

This act was an attempt by the US government to “Americanize” Native Americans. Based on these two pieces of legislation, the official viewpoint of the government during this time period was to encourage settlement of the West by encouraging the American tradition of private ownership of land, but this was just a front to hide the true discrimination and destruction that Native Americans were forced to endure. The official viewpoint is not accurately reflected in the song “Don’t Drink the Water”, however, this song does reflect the realities of what was happening in the West during this time period as a result of these two land policies. The main perspective of the song is that the incoming settlers were attempting to force the Native Americans off their land, which is shown through phrases like “you have been banished, your land is gone” and “...you must move on or I will bury you”. Phrases like these are littered throughout the sone and demonstrate how the settlers didn’t care that they were imposing on Native American’s

Show More
Related
1071 Words | 5 Pages

His views regarding the Indians were distorted by his absolute loathe towards them, creating a toxic environment for the Natives. Due to the constant requests and suggestions to relocate the Indians west of the Mississippi River, a dry place seemingly uninhabitable for farm life, Andrew passed the “Indian Removal Act” which remunerated the “Five Civilized Tribes,” the Creek, Chickasaw, Seminole, Cherokee, and Choctaw to abandon their lands and move west of the Mississippi. Although this may sound fair, paying the tribes to migrate someplace else, the lands that they were given was much too unsuitable for the sustainability of crops and the conditions they had to endure during their journey west were absolutely sickening. Some tribes accepted the policy, whereas the Cherokee was defiant against the unethical policies, stating that the policy did not apply to them as they were a separate and independent nation with their own individual laws. Jackson, being the tyrant he is, ignores the Cherokees’ statements and continues to enforce the policy, even though the Supreme Court had already settled on a final ruling.

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

The tribe still uses some of the settlement water to runoff to restore wetlands along the river. He believes that some members deserved more than 650,000 acre-feet, he thought that it wasn’t fair that they only agreed because they were afraid of the possibility of losing their case in

Read More
154 Words | 1 Pages

The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was a time where there were lots of contradictions. Meanwhile It was a period of land hungry Americans who wanted to expand land democratic institutions which unfolded the limitations of democracy. The states put an end to property restrictions and due to the Louisiana purchase of1812 the American's saw more opportunities to start expanding and settling in towards the west, but was all destroyed for the native Americans who lived that way. No one knew the way the democracy worked at this age better than the Cherokees, who embraced their lifestyle and culture only to be mistreated and misunderstood when sent to be moved forcibly against their will from their home land and move to the east. In this document I will

Read More
1501 Words | 7 Pages

The Act led to an array of legal and moral arguments for and against the need to relocate the Indians westward from the agriculturally productive lands of the Mississippi in Georgia and parts of Alabama. This paper compares and contrasts the major arguments for and against the

Read More
386 Words | 2 Pages

In Chief Tecumseh’s speech, he describes the tyranny and conflict between the united states government and the native peoples. He explains that the natives should not sell their lands, for they have no right to do so because the land belongs to all people and not one group. Tecumseh shows this when he writes, “Sell a country?! Why not sell the air, the great sea, as well as the earth” (L. 30). The air, the sea, and the earth are priceless in the eyes of many, he parallels these three with the selling of a country to demonstrate how the natives value their land.

Read More
1122 Words | 5 Pages

“One can never forget the sadness and solemnity of that morning of that morning… Many of the children rose to their feet and waved their little hands good-by to their mountain homes, knowing they were leaving them forever.” - John G. Burnett, US military interpreter during the Trail of Tears. In one of the blackest marks made in history by the United States, the Trail of Tears was the brutal removal of the Cherokee and many other tribes from their homes. While the Supreme Court had ruled that the Cherokee Nation had the right to the land, Andrew Jackson had forced nearly 1,600 Native Americans to march to Oklahoma from Georgia and surrounding areas instead, ignoring the court ruling. The Indian Removal Act was a step in the wrong direction for our

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

Analysis of The Royal Proclamation of 1763 The title of the source is The Proclamation of 1763. The document is a primary source of a law produced by the British King and Parliament. The title clearly shows that parliament wrote this in 1763. This document was a response to Pontiac’s Rebellion, which was one of the first acts of revolt against the Settler.

Read More
790 Words | 4 Pages

It’s hard to truly say whether growth in the late 19th century was good. It gave rise to a new era of industrialization, and ushered in a new, globalised society. It also toppled the old notion of the American Dream, and drew to question what words like freedom and equality truly meant. It put power in the hands of the wealthy and took freedom from the disadvantaged. A new system of power was borne unto the world, one where money is power, and power is freedom.

Read More
885 Words | 4 Pages

(University of Richmond,1) It is rather a source of joy that our country affords scope where our young population may range unconstrained in body or in mind,developing the power and faculties of man in their highest perfection-stated President Andrew Jackson at his second State of The Union Address. He is prophesying about the promise and potential that the Indian Removal Act holds. Passed on May 28,1830,The Indian Removal Act allowed the US government to exchange unsettled lands west of the Mississippi River for Indian lands within the boundaries of southern states like Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi. This was necessary because the jurisdiction was conflicting between the state government and the Indians.

Read More
1063 Words | 5 Pages

In the United States Constitution it states, “The migration of such persons (slaves) … shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the year 1808;…”(Doc J). Here Americans are viewing Native Americans and blacks equally in one big social class. In addition to this Document P states, “The utmost good faith shall always be observed towards the Indians ; their lans and property shall never be taken from them without their consent; and their property, rights, and liberty, they shall never be invaded or disturbed…”(Doc P). Here the Government is showing more respect to these different social classes and allowing people of lower social classes to live peacefully and unharmed. In relation to this Document D shows many people of different social classes all playing a game of pool together (Doc D).

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

This was therefore against the constitution and basis of democracy, meaning that Andrew Jackson, who established the act, went against democratic principles. After making them sign treaties promising that their land would not be taken away from them, Jackson’s men took away their land. This went against governing principles, to disregard a treaty is a sign of corruption and injustice. There is no place for injustice in a democratic government otherwise it starts resembling to a dictatorship or a monarchy. Furthermore, the Native Americans are American citizens in modern times and even if not considered back then it was a violation of the people's rights, the Native Americans did not choose to leave but we forcefully pushed out of their land.

Read More
911 Words | 4 Pages

Calhoun views compromise as a bad thing. He sees it as a dividing factor rather than a uniting factor. He uses the specific example of the division of the military to show that compromise is bad and it will ultimately cause the defense to of the country to weaken. Examples of past failed compromises are the Missouri Compromise and Clay’s proposed compromise in 1821. 8.

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

During the “Gilded Age” period of American history, development of the Trans-Mississippi west was crucial to fulfilling the American dream of manifest destiny and creating an identity which was distinctly American. Since the west is often associated with rugged pioneers and frontiersmen, there is an overarching idea of hardy American individualism. However, although these settlers were brave and helped to make America into what it is today, they heavily relied on federal support. It would not have been possible for white Americans to settle the Trans-Mississippi west without the US government removing Native Americans from their lands and placing them on reservations, offering land grants and incentives for people to move out west, and the

Read More
600 Words | 3 Pages

It involved native americans from being forcibly removed from their ancestral lands. In his speech Chief Joseph states “From where the sun stands I will fight no more forever”(Pg 622). This relates to what is happening during this time period because Indian Removal led to Chief Joseph's tribe from being removed from their home. In the quote Chief Joseph is surrendering and giving in to Indian Removal. The United States wanted Chief Joseph's Nez Perce Oregon native lands so whites can settle there and the U.S. wanted to relocate them to an Indian reservation in Idaho.

Read More
1058 Words | 5 Pages

“ Leasing farmland was a way for Natives to simultaneously push away Anglo-American culture yet also assimilate in a way that benefits Natives most, in other words: accomodation. Although many Natives attempts at land leasing resulted negatively, like the 1889 Agreement which stated that the government no longer needed Siox agreement to take reservation land, both the Ghost Dance and farm leasings were first steps to Native Americans successfully negotiating with Anglo-Americans. Now Natives could play the same legal hands, and work under the same economy, as Anglo-Americans

Read More

More about Summary Of Don T Drink The Water By Dave Matthews

Related Topics

Open Document