ipl-logo

How Was The Indian Removal Act Justified

885 Words4 Pages

(University of Richmond,1)
It is rather a source of joy that our country affords scope where our young population may range unconstrained in body or in mind,developing the power and faculties of man in their highest perfection-stated President Andrew Jackson at his second State of The Union Address.He is prophesying about the promise and potential that the Indian Removal Act holds.Passed on May 28,1830,The Indian Removal Act allowed the US government to exchange unsettled lands west of the Mississippi River for Indian lands within the boundaries of southern states like Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi.This was necessary because the jurisdiction was conflicting between the state government and the Indians.With all the values and rules that the United States hold, a question has to be answered: Was The Indian Removal Act Justified? Due to the benevolent policy of the government, the protection of the Natives,and the improvement of general welfare, it should be …show more content…

First, It cleared up Georgia and Florida which helped farmers have lands for farming cotton. With the boom of cotton growth in the southern states,the economy was boosted massively.Second, the population of the US was increasing and there was an urgent need for more land.The 1830 census shows that there were 12,866,020 people living in the United States,who needed more space.There were only about a 100,000 native Americans spread around their territories.Finally,It was the responsibility of the Government. According to Andrew Jackson, “It is, therefore, a duty which this government owes to the new States to extinguish as soon as possible the Indian title to all lands which Congress themselves have included within their limits.”(State of The Union Address,1829) When the US bought over Georgia and Florida they had to get rid of any indigenous people or intruders. All in all,this act really was necessary for the development of our

Show More
Related
170 Words | 1 Pages

The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Indians land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their land in the states, but could not force them to leave. He violated and broke commitments that he even negotiated with them. He tried to bribe the Indians and even threatened some of them. Alfred Cave organizes his article thematically and is trying to prove

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

Do you like getting kicked out after working hard and establishing a great community. On May 28, 1830 Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act. This act states that all the indians will have to move from their land that they had first into unknown land that is supposedly a huge hunk of the Louisiana just for them with fertile soil and a water source. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was terrible and unjustified; indians had already build up an amazing society, they were there first, and the americans have already messed with the indians. For starters, the Indians have built up a respectable town.

Read More
1501 Words | 7 Pages

The Act led to an array of legal and moral arguments for and against the need to relocate the Indians westward from the agriculturally productive lands of the Mississippi in Georgia and parts of Alabama. This paper compares and contrasts the major arguments for and against the

Read More
1176 Words | 5 Pages

An Indian Removal Act was signed into law by president Andrew Jackson in 1830, it authorized the president to grant unsettled lands in the West in exchange for Indian lands within the state borders. Some Indian tribes accepted and followed the relocation policy peacefully, but many resisted. During the period after the Civil War, millions of people moved from farms and cities in the East and Midwest, and immigrated from European and Asian countries, to the cheap land and fields with gold and riches in the West to improve their lives with a greater possibility of success. The completion of transcontinental railroads to the west after the Civil War opened up vast areas of the West for settlements and economic development. This huge westward movement, which was a result of the Civil War and Reconstruction, affected the Native Americans catastrophically.

Read More
552 Words | 3 Pages

By far, the Indian Removal Act is a very barbarous thing to put our fellow Native Americans through. To begin with, removal of the indians is a very bribing and forceful action. The fact that we would all take the measures to force them off of their land is uncalled for, especially since it is land of their own. We cannot just bribe and trick the tribes for the comfort of ourselves, all stated in Document 6, Senator Peleg Sprague. In Document 5, Theodore Frelinghuysen, Frelinghuysen’s speech mentions how removal of the tribes would involve, very violent actions and crowded acres as they will be forced onto lands west of the Mississippi.

Read More
841 Words | 4 Pages

American history is our hope for the future because it is important to the United States government to learn from past mistakes, and citizens need to understand the value that freedom provides to the american society. But most importantly Americans need to understand what the U.S. Constitution is and how it has affected America. One of the many mistakes that America has made is the Indian Removal Act. On May 28, 1830 President Andrew Jackson signed into law that all Native Americans west of the Mississippi River must be removed, and sent to what is known as the state of Oklahoma. Their forced march from southeast to the west was devastating.

Read More
476 Words | 2 Pages

Would you remove an abundance of Indians from their homes for money? That is what the Indian Removal Act did. Hundreds of Native Americans were taken from their homes. Andrew Jackson and John Ross had a debate on if they should get rid of the Indian Removal Act or if they should keep it. The Indian Removal Act was a step in the right direction.

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

First, The indian removal act was to move the indian tribes that were occupying land onto western reservations. The indian tribes tried to go to court to fight against the act using the government. The supreme court agreed with the indians, that they did not have to move, but President Jackson made them move anyway because he believed that the supreme court could not support its ruling. President Jackson went against the Supreme Court so that he could sell the land for more money after the indians were relocated. The evidence in this paragraph was taken from the document “President Jackson and Indian Removal.”

Read More
1015 Words | 5 Pages

This act allowed states to remove Native Americans from places east of the Mississippi River. Jackson supported this act because he wanted to make more land available for American farmers. Only because of Andrew Jackson did congress approve the removal. For instance, “Under pressure from Jackson, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act in 1830” (“RCE”).

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

The Indian Removal Act was signed in 1830 by President Andrew Jackson to remove the Cherokee Indians from their homes and force them to settle west of the Mississippi River. The act was passed in hopes to gain agrarian land that would replenish the cotton industry which had plummeted after the Panic of 1819. Andrew Jackson believed that effectively forcing the Cherokees to become more civilized and to christianize them would be beneficial to them. Therefore, he thought the journey westward was necessary. In late 1838, the Cherokees were removed from their homes and forced into a brutal journey westward in the bitter cold.

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

Reading Analysis Essay In the journal, Mobilizing Women, Anticipating Abolition: The Struggle Against Indian Removal in the 1830s, the author Mary Hershberger describes the unprecedented acts of benevolent women participating in abolishment of the removal of Indians introduced by President Andrew Jackson. The Indian Removal Act was signed into law in 1830 coercing Cherokee Indians to move beyond of the Mississippi River. The failure of the attempt of abolishing the removal of the Indians, the experience gave way to the support of other campaigns. President Jackson wholeheartedly favored the removal of the Cherokees west of the Mississippi.

Read More
1236 Words | 5 Pages

Around the 1820s, whites worked to increasingly survey and squat tribal lands. Indians often experienced great injustice from whites. Furthermore, in 1830 President Andrew Jackson issued for the Indian Removal Act, which granted him the ability to "exchange public lands in the West for Indian territories in the East" (255). Further evidence, Jackson's excerpt stated that, "It will relieve the whole state of Mississippi and the Western part of Alabama of Indian occupancy, and enable those states to advance rapidly in population, wealth, and power" {Doc E}. With this

Read More
1011 Words | 5 Pages

During the 1800s, the federal government promoted westward expansion in various ways. This expansion changed the shape and character of the country. America was able to get Westward Expansion in various ways like purchasing it and fighting for it. There were also various impacts that the expansion had on America, a positive result was the Homestead Act of 1862. This was when the government gave people land, but they had to grow a field full of crops in 5 years to obtain the land for free.

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

The Indian Removal Act isn’t justified. No one wants to leave their home. It's sad and depressing when they’re kicked out. They don’t know where to go and what to do. It's a very difficult situation and that should happen to nobody if they didn’t do anything

Read More
832 Words | 4 Pages

The Indian Removal Act was passed during Andrew Jackson’s presidency on May 28, 1830. This authorized the president to grant land that was west of the Mississippi River to Indians that agreed to give up their homeland. They believed that the land could be more profitably farmed by non-Indians.

Read More

More about How Was The Indian Removal Act Justified

Related Topics

Open Document