ipl-logo

The Indian Removal Act By Andrew Jackson And John Ross

476 Words2 Pages

Would you remove an abundance of Indians from their homes for money? That is what the Indian Removal Act did. Hundreds of Native Americans were taken from their homes. Andrew Jackson and John Ross had a debate on if they should get rid of the Indian Removal Act or if they should keep it. The Indian Removal Act was a step in the right direction. According to Andrew Jackson’s Second Annual Message (Document B), he states “It puts an end to all possible danger of collision between the authorities of the General and State Governments on account of the Indians.” Some may believe that it is only going to hurt the Native Americans. By opening the whole territory between between Tennessee on the north and Louisiana on the south to the settlement of the whites it will incalculably strengthen the southwestern frontier and it will make the state's power strong enough to disallow future invasions. This overall, will protect the U.S. from foreign invasions and will make the U.S stronger. Andrew Jackson said it will separate indians from coming in contact with the whites. …show more content…

Others my say that this is not treating them equally and that whites have already have come in contact with the Native Americans according to John G. Burnett’s Story (Document A). Andrew Jackson’s Message (Document B) states, “To cast off their savage habits and become an interesting, civilized, and Christian Community.” It will enable them to pursue happiness in their own way and would stop their slow extinction. Jackson also said it was important to the indians as well. It would also benefit parts of travel and

Show More
Related

How Did Andrew Jackson Contribute To The Indian Removal Act

464 Words | 2 Pages

The Indian Removal Act was a law that allowed the president to bargain with Indian tribes in the south of the United States of America for their disposal to federal territory. So it basically forced the indians to move out of their own homes. In 1832, Andrew Jackson vetoed the bill to recharter the bank of the United States of America. In 1835, they went into federal dept, Jackson worked extremely forceful and paid off the whole national debt after he was elected as president again in 1832.

Read More

Andrew Jackson Abuse Of Power Summary

170 Words | 1 Pages

The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Indians land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their land in the states, but could not force them to leave. He violated and broke commitments that he even negotiated with them. He tried to bribe the Indians and even threatened some of them. Alfred Cave organizes his article thematically and is trying to prove

Read More

How Did Andrew Jackson Contribute To The Removal Of The Five Civilized Tribals

322 Words | 2 Pages

In order for Andrew Jackson to get the Creeks and other Indians to agree to the treaties he would promise security in a different

Read More

How Did Andrew Jackson Dbq

184 Words | 1 Pages

If he was really trying to help the Indians get their land back he would have not agreed that remcoing them benefits the Americans. In the treaty of New Echota it states.” That a sum not exceeding five million dollars be paid to the Cherokee Indians for all their land and possessions.” (Treaty of New Echota). Andrew Jackson also signed the New Echota Treaty so he wanted the removal

Read More

Jackson's Removal Dbq

218 Words | 1 Pages

Jackson’s plans of removal were favored by many Americans as he convinced them that it was practical and for the better good of Native Americans. Jackson stated that he had given them many incentives to leave. Native Americans would be provided with ample supplies and supported for a year after their move to western lands. Jackson believed that this was a practical resolution to the issues developing between the two nations. Jackson acknowledged that the intrusion of Americans onto western land was occurring, but he did not believe that it was a genuine problem.

Read More

Andrew Jackson Dbq Analysis

1467 Words | 6 Pages

It started with Jackson promoting that the idea will benefit everyone; whites and Indians. This can be recognized in document F, “The consequences of a speedy removal will be important to the United States, to individual States, and to the Indians themselves…. It will separate the Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites; free them from the power of the States; enable them to pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude [simple] institutions. … What good man would prefer a country covered with forests and ranged by a few thousand savages to our extensive Republic, studded with cities, towns, and prosperous farms … occupied by more than 12,000,000 happy people, and filled with all the blessings of liberty, civilization, and religion? … We now propose to acquire the [land] occupied by the red men… by a fair exchange, and, at the expense of the United States, to send them to land where their existence may be prolonged and perhaps made perpetual.”

Read More

Andrew Jackson During Indian Removal

91 Words | 1 Pages

Andrew Jackson caused the death of 12,290 Indians during Indian removal. Andrew Jackson was the 7th President of the United States of America and a former general during the War of 1812.He quickly rose to power by being the “voice of the common man” he had 11 children and a wife yet he also signed one of the most conservation act ever the Indian Removal Act. Andrew Jackson shouldn 't be allowed to be on our money because he caused the death of tens of thousands of Indians and violates the constitution.

Read More

Jacksonian Democratic Ideals

468 Words | 2 Pages

Throughout the early 19th century, changing politics and an evolving society in America impacted all classes of people, specifically the white working class. Jacksonian Democratic ideals was influenced by the working class, and the white working class benefited from President Jackson’s decisions. During the year of Jackson’s presidential election, the Workies, which consisted of working men, wanted to protect individuals who earned money from arduous labor, but failed to make payments punctually. Jacksonian Democrats realized the Workies language was valuable in the fact that beliefs of the Workies group echoed through Jackson’s party.

Read More

The Indian Removal Act In The 1830's

726 Words | 3 Pages

President Jackson in his message shows how he hates the Indians by calling them “savages” and does not like how they are different from the European-American people. Also he is contradicting himself because the Indians did attempt to civilize themselves the way that the European- American’s wanted and denied and ignored their

Read More

Why Is The Indian Removal Act Enforced

544 Words | 3 Pages

The president during the enforcement of the Indian removal act, Andrew Jackson, thought that the indigenous people were less civilized and moral than the settlers, although many of the tribes had adapted to the European lifestyle. He did not believe that the more “civilized” people should live alongside the indigenous people. When congress passed the Indian removal act in 1830 that stated that it was legal to force indigenous people off of their land, he fully enforced it, pushing tribes west. When there was an auction of Cherokee land, he claimed he couldn 't do anything to stop it, but he didn 't truly want to. The indigenous people wanted to coexist in peace, as Red Jacket stated, “‘You have got our country but are not satisfied; you want to force your religion upon us….

Read More

Andrew Jackson, The National Bank, And The Nullification Crisis

455 Words | 2 Pages

While Andrew Jackson may have believed he was helping the common man and ruling for the majority, his unfair and inconsistent presidency was reflected in his treatment of Native Americans, the National Bank, and the Nullification crisis. Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act into law in order to move Native American’s out of their own land to move in American settlers. For one, the Natives had no rights and no real way to reason with the US government, making it easy to remove them from any land East of the Mississippi. Jackson wanted to help the majority of Americans, but did not speak for the majority of Native Americans, who he considered savages and uncivilized. Jackson’s role in the nullification crisis was very important, as he helped increase sectionalism in the South.

Read More

Andrew Jackson: A Hero Or Villain?

865 Words | 4 Pages

Andrew Jackson’s sentiment towards the Native Americans was certainly not a kind one. Manifest destiny was a popular belief among Americans, including Jackson, and he would go to the extent of forcing Native Americans out of their homes to reach their “ordained goal”. He believed in the expansion of southern slavery which is why he pushed for removing the Indians west of the Mississippi, which makes it the more disgraceful. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 said that it will allow American government to offer in-state territories to the Indian’s for their western land. This wasn’t the case when the U.S. went in and drove the Indians out by force.

Read More

The Forceful Removal Of The Cherokees By Andrew Jackson

419 Words | 2 Pages

The forceful removal of the Cherokees by Andrew Jackson was an inhumane act that should have never happened in the first place. Andrew Jackson had no justifiable reason as to why he needed to use force to relocate the Cherokee to unfamiliar pastures. The unjust eviction of the Cherokees was done out of selfish demands by the white settlers who looked at the Indians as obstacles to their development. These white settlers wanted to start growing cotton on the land that these Indians occupied which led Andrew Jackson to implement the inhumane policy. This policy forced the Cherokee to put up a struggle which led to them being offered a deal to migrate within two years voluntarily and would be forcefully removed if they had not left by then.

Read More

What Is The Main Idea Of Andrew Jackson's Letter To Congress

506 Words | 3 Pages

In Andrew Jackson’s letter to the Congress he explains how the whites and the Indians would now be separated. This starts a large chain effect on segregation throughout history. This law is a social factor because it separated the Indians and the whites, causing them to live completely separate lives from each other. At one point he also states that a collision between the two would be dangerous. This is also a social factor because it implies that white people should and are seen differently than the Indians by saying that their land isn’t important, therefore we are going to take it.

Read More

Analysis Of Andrew Jackson's Speech

374 Words | 2 Pages

He achieved this by purposely neglecting the true horrors behind the removal of the Indians. Andrew Jackson portrayed the Native Americans as less than equal. The purpose of Jackson's speech was to justify his motives in moving the natives and to also convince congress that it was both beneficial to the Natives and the Americans. The source has value because it gives some insight into Jackson’s effort behind his motivation. Based on his purpose of speech, it can be learned that the relationship between the Natives and Americans was only beneficial for certain necessities.

Read More

More about The Indian Removal Act By Andrew Jackson And John Ross

Related Topics

Open Document