ipl-logo

Indian Removal Act Dbq Essay

552 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Attributes and significance of indian removal act

How would you feel if you were told that you have to move off of your own land to somewhere else just for the pleasure of other people? The Indian Removal Act will not only be cruel and harsh, but it will be extremely wrong on our part. What side do you stand on? Are you in favor of, or against it? You surely, will not only disagree with this act, but will be completely against it. By far, the Indian Removal Act is a very barbarous thing to put our fellow Native Americans through. To begin with, removal of the indians is a very bribing and forceful action. The fact that we would all take the measures to force them off of their land is uncalled for, especially since it is land of their own. We cannot just bribe and trick the tribes for the comfort of ourselves, all stated in Document 6, Senator Peleg Sprague. In Document 5, Theodore Frelinghuysen, Frelinghuysen’s speech mentions how removal of the tribes would involve, very violent actions and crowded acres as they will be forced onto lands west of the Mississippi. You, the people of The United States need to consider the misery you’d be in if you went through this devastating time. …show more content…

In Document 3, Cherokee Nation, a cherokee tribal member gave a speech that one part states, “This is the land of our Nativity; the land of our birth. We cannot consent to abandon it for another far inferior [place]”. Meaning they will not give up there land that they were born on, for somewhere else. Theodore Frelinghuysen’s speech, (Document 5, Theodore Frelinghuysen) mentions that a long, long time ago, God placed the tribes where he wanted them, which means they were here way before us, and we should not force them to move. Both documents infer that their land is important and sacred to them. They truly, should have the rights to stay on their land, no matter

Show More
Related
341 Words | 2 Pages

The Indian Removal Act, passed by congress, provided for the resettlement of all Native Americans occupying the east of the Mississippi to Oklahoma.

Read More
303 Words | 2 Pages

Indians had lived in the same areas for many years and had become much more accustomed to being civilized and had even started schools, making laws and becoming farmers. But all of that didn’t matter, there was increasing pressure to open up the area the Indians inhabited so the white men could settle there. The Indian Removal Act stated that all Indians must move to lands west of the Mississippi River, Jackson said the Indians would receive money for the land they lost and that all expenses would be paid for. The act was supposed to be voluntary but they were pressured to go and the tribes that did not go peacefully were forced. While most tribes did go peacefully the Cherokee Indians wanted to fight the Removal Act and took it to the Supreme

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

As if they were messing with their culture, so many of the people formed problems with President Jackson because of it. Eventually the bill passes through the Senate and the house in late April and May. The whole Indian Removal Act was just a way to get Native Americans the full title to the new land. The government was going to pay

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

We like to think of our land as our land, but is it really ours? We all know of Squanto and how he helped the pilgrims survive, yet we fail to show our appreciation. After helping these new people to their land, the Indians including the Osage are driven from their land to deserted reservations meant specifically for them in the Indian removal act. To make matters worse, the land rush of 1889 had the Osage moved to even smaller areas. Now the Osage were relying on the government to support them as they knew not how to plant crops and could not scavenge as they used to.

Read More
1501 Words | 7 Pages

The Act led to an array of legal and moral arguments for and against the need to relocate the Indians westward from the agriculturally productive lands of the Mississippi in Georgia and parts of Alabama. This paper compares and contrasts the major arguments for and against the

Read More
530 Words | 3 Pages

In Document 1, President Monroe argued that the removal of the Indians would,” not only shield them from impending ruin, but promote welfare and happiness . . . [If this doesn’t happen] their degradation and extermination will be inevitable. In other words, Monroe was saying that removing the Indian tribes and transporting them to another place would greatly benefit them instead of their land before. If they stayed in their original land, complete destruction will befall upon them. The greed of the American people comes to no end and all they want is more.

Read More
764 Words | 4 Pages

Andrew Jackson’s presidency was a turning point of sorts for the United States. For the first time ever there was a president “of the common man”, as he was referred to. Prior to him getting into office, the United States a fledgling nation, had yet to see anyone other than high-ranking, old money aristocrats in office. It can be hard to feel fully represented and provided for when your government is unfamiliar with your problems and needs. These was not an issue that was unfamiliar, in fact the problem of illegitimate representation was what the colonists had sought to escape when under Britain’s rule.

Read More
476 Words | 2 Pages

Would you remove an abundance of Indians from their homes for money? That is what the Indian Removal Act did. Hundreds of Native Americans were taken from their homes. Andrew Jackson and John Ross had a debate on if they should get rid of the Indian Removal Act or if they should keep it. The Indian Removal Act was a step in the right direction.

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

The Indian tribes were there for over a century when the Americans had just arrived not too long ago at the time. A person can obviously understand that the Indians had more of a right to kick the Americans out than vice versa. At least the Americans had offered the Indians something in return for their land. A large sum of money and a big land area bigger than Georgia was offered in exchange for the Indians to move out of the state. The proposal was quite the head scratcher, but why would the Indians risk moving to a new land they don’t have much knowledge about and risk the health of their people in the move?

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

The Indian Removal Act was signed in 1830 by President Andrew Jackson to remove the Cherokee Indians from their homes and force them to settle west of the Mississippi River. The act was passed in hopes to gain agrarian land that would replenish the cotton industry which had plummeted after the Panic of 1819. Andrew Jackson believed that effectively forcing the Cherokees to become more civilized and to christianize them would be beneficial to them. Therefore, he thought the journey westward was necessary. In late 1838, the Cherokees were removed from their homes and forced into a brutal journey westward in the bitter cold.

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

In the proposals prior to the journey, officials made people believe it would be an easy journey. The language of the Indian Removal Act foreshadowed the horrific treatment of the Native Americans referring to them as savages and barbarians. The actions towards Native Americans were humiliating and degrading including being dragged from their homes and buried in unmarked graves. These Native Americans were forced to leave their entire livelihood behind only to support the white cause, which did not benefit them in any

Read More
1102 Words | 5 Pages

Indians were being surrounded a whole nation and not willing to give up their life style and costumes, relocation was best option in order to stay alive and take care of their culture. During the late 1820s a number of small “civilized tribes” had become a part of American society; some have moved into cabins, houses, and even mansions. After the Indian Removal Act of 1830, there was great unpleasant experience among the Indians who decided to remain on the natural land and way of life. Some of the Indians rejected the money given by Americans for their land. They stated that too much of their land had been taken already in the past 20 years and would defend and die for the land if it was necessary.

Read More
621 Words | 3 Pages

This is not true and should not even play a part in any decision made to the Native American population. Therefore, we should not be forced of our homeland because according to the doctrine of discovery, which states that any land discovered by a government subjects is the one who owns it. However, the Cherokee and Native American as a whole were here first and own the land. The United States government cannot simply take away from us what we own, but that being said does not mean we cannot live in peace with the United

Read More
265 Words | 2 Pages

Nobody's lives would be the same after losing the ones they had lost during the long journey. The Indian Removal Act and the Trail of Tears were terrible events for the Native American people to live through. They lost lives, supplies, homes, and family memories.

Read More
1866 Words | 8 Pages

During one of his powerful speeches, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said “Our nation was born in genocide when it embraced the doctrine that the original American, the Indian, was an inferior race.” Scholars talk of what happened to the Indians as a great tragedy, but never anything further. We deny what happened to the Indians, particularly the Cherokees. During the 1830’s, the United States government set out to remove all Cherokee individuals from their homes and relocate them west. Relocation meant ending up on a land foreign to them, and presented with environmental conditions that posed difficulties for human living.

Read More

More about Indian Removal Act Dbq Essay

Related Topics

Open Document