ipl-logo

Letter From Killers Of The Flower Moon By David Grann

712 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Analysis of the Indian removal act

Letter To Governor Of Oklahoma Dear Mr. Governor, I’m writing this letter in order to ask that you repay the Osage for all the hardships that they were put through during and after the reign of terror. After reading Killers Of The Flower Moon by David Grann, it has come to my attention just how much the Osage have suffered. I’m not just talking about the reign of terror, I'm also talking about the unfair laws and acts, corrupt justice system, and so called guardians of their money. All I ask is that they receive a fair amount of compensation or even a way for the Osage tribe to make money off of the windmills that are invading the Osage land. Before you make up your mind, allow me to elaborate on all the wrong doings and mistreatment that has transpired against the Osage. …show more content…

We like to think of our land as our land, but is it really ours? We all know of Squanto and how he helped the pilgrims survive, yet we fail to show our appreciation. After helping these new people to their land, the Indians including the Osage are driven from their land to deserted reservations meant specifically for them in the Indian removal act. To make matters worse, the land rush of 1889 had the Osage moved to even smaller areas. Now the Osage were relying on the government to support them as they knew not how to plant crops and could not scavenge as they used to. Most of the shipments meant for the Osage went missing along the way or never got sent in the first place. The Osage did as they were told and yet the government did almost nothing to keep them alive. David Grann’s Killers of The Flower Moon went into great detail about the missing shipments and how the government didn’t step in to help until an Osage leader almost had to threaten battle. To make matters worse, when the Osage finally were able to make a living off of the oil, they continued to experience laws and rules against

Show More
Related

Analysis Of After The Frontier: Separation And Absorption In US Indian Policy

622 Words | 3 Pages

“The settler colonial logic of elimination in its crudest form, a violent rejection of all things Indian, was transformed into a paternalistic mode of governmentality which, though still sanctioned by state violence, came to focus on assimilation rather than rejection.” –Patrick Wolfe, After the Frontier: Separation and Absorption in US Indian Policy, 13 Wolfe’s statement illustrates how the US government put more emphasis on legalized absorption of Indians into the White society rather than using forceful and violent methods to acquire the Natives’ land. After the colonization of the westward land and the end of the Frontier era, the US government’s method of assimilation of the Indians started revolving around allotment and blood quanta. With no place to further push the Natives away, the established Bureau of Indian Affairs and the government took action to eliminate the Natives culturally and spiritually instead of physically.

Read More

Louis Riel Sparknotes

820 Words | 4 Pages

“This is our land! It isn’t a piece of pemmican to be cut off and given in little pieces to us. It is ours and we will take what we want.” (voices and visions chapter 8 pg.181, poundmaker in the english tongue) The Cree and many Métis believed that the land was theirs and they were entitled to it.

Read More

Summary Of The Hunger For Indian Land In Andrew Jackson's America

1434 Words | 6 Pages

In the article by Anthony F. C. Wallace, “The Hunger for Indian Land in Andrew Jackson’s America,” the reasons for America's need for Indian land is discussed. The purpose of this article is to explain the Indian removal that occurred under Andrew Jackson’s presidency. The thesis of this essay states that Americans kicked the Natives off of their land to fulfill a selfish desire to expand the cotton industry.           The first point Wallace uses to support his thesis is how Jackson’s financial interest in the land affected the removal of Natives.

Read More

Differences Between The French And Indian War Dbq

413 Words | 2 Pages

In 1742 the chief of Onondaga of the Iroquois Confederacy knew that his land that the people shared would become more valuable than it has ever been. (Doc B)The reason for this was because the “white people” also known as the Americans wanted the land of the chief. The feelings of the Chief result in complaining to the representatives of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia,

Read More

How Did The Indian Removal Act Dbq

661 Words | 3 Pages

why would America claim it's theirs if they’ve probably never even seen the land. According to an article written by PBS I titled “Indian Removal” it states, “In 1823 the Supreme Court handed down a decision which stated that Indians could occupy lands within the United States, but could not hold title to those lands. This was because their “right of occupancy” It's ridiculous that America wants to move something or more importantly someone that has been there for hundreds of years. If you don't understand what I mean, Think about it this way, would you want to be moved from your house after living there for live thirty years.

Read More

Indian Removal Act Of 1830 Dbq

154 Words | 1 Pages

The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was a time where there were lots of contradictions. Meanwhile It was a period of land hungry Americans who wanted to expand land democratic institutions which unfolded the limitations of democracy. The states put an end to property restrictions and due to the Louisiana purchase of1812 the American's saw more opportunities to start expanding and settling in towards the west, but was all destroyed for the native Americans who lived that way. No one knew the way the democracy worked at this age better than the Cherokees, who embraced their lifestyle and culture only to be mistreated and misunderstood when sent to be moved forcibly against their will from their home land and move to the east. In this document I will

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Indian Removal Act Of 1790

1501 Words | 7 Pages

The Act led to an array of legal and moral arguments for and against the need to relocate the Indians westward from the agriculturally productive lands of the Mississippi in Georgia and parts of Alabama. This paper compares and contrasts the major arguments for and against the

Read More

Indian Removal Act Dbq Essay

552 Words | 3 Pages

In Document 3, Cherokee Nation, a cherokee tribal member gave a speech that one part states, “This is the land of our Nativity; the land of our birth. We cannot consent to abandon it for another far inferior [place]”. Meaning they will not give up there land that they were born on, for somewhere else. Theodore Frelinghuysen’s speech, (Document 5, Theodore Frelinghuysen) mentions that a long, long time ago, God placed the tribes where he wanted them, which means they were here way before us, and we should not force them to move. Both documents infer that their land is important and sacred to them.

Read More

Summary Of Excellent Sheep By William Deresiewicz

518 Words | 3 Pages

All of us get just one fresh chance to start as a freshman in college, and I got this chance at UC Santa Cruz. I was amazed when I took a campus tour of UC Santa Cruz and found out about the irons in the fire UCSC offers. I was excited as well as nervous to start a significant part of my life at UCSC. Out of multifarious lessons life has taught me before I joined college is that no one can control change, one can only choose whether or not to accept it. I still have a lot to learn as I start my four year college adventure.

Read More

How Was The Indian Removal Act Justified

885 Words | 4 Pages

Finally,It was the responsibility of the Government. According to Andrew Jackson, “It is, therefore, a duty which this government owes to the new States to extinguish as soon as possible the Indian title to all lands which Congress themselves have included within their limits. ”(State of The Union Address,1829) When the US bought over Georgia and Florida they had to get rid of any indigenous people or intruders. All in all,this act really was necessary for the development of our

Read More

How Did Technology Affect Territorial Expansion

794 Words | 4 Pages

“In 1817, Americans burned a Seminole village on the border (Florida), killed five Indians, dispersed the rest.” (Shi and Tindall, 306) This comes to show that the trail of tears was not the first ruthless obtainment of territory on America’s part, and as shown throughout History, it was not the last. Territorial expansion helped raise the population and diversity of white men and women, but through the expansion of America in unscrupulous ways millions of Native Americans and black slaves were killed. America’s hunger for more territory was not always satisfied by the thieving of other ethnic group’s territories, soon America began pioneering west once more.

Read More

What Are Andrew Jackson's Ideals

427 Words | 2 Pages

The Indians were forced to move west, Andrew Jackson offered the Indians the same amount of land, but that wasn’t the point. The Indians couldn’t care less on the land in the west. That land they were on was their sacred land. Overall the Native Americans were given the same amount of land that didn’t allow Jackson or the government to take

Read More

Andrew Jackson And The Indian Removal Act

251 Words | 2 Pages

The land was seen as a way to a greater nation because people believed God gave them the right. However, while they believed this and tried to make it happened, they had a conflict. Native American stood in their way and the only way to get what the people wanted the Natives needed to leave. This brings on the Indian Removal Act that occurred in 1830 leaded by Andrew Jackson. This can be seen in the article written by Jackson on the Removal Act on the lines, “It will place a dense and civilized population in large tracts of occupied by a few savage hunters.”

Read More

Native American Rights In The 1800s

1119 Words | 5 Pages

This is made clear in the “Cherokee County Map” by James Mooney, which shows the outlines of Cherokee territory throughout the years. From the start of the American Revolution to the Final Cession Cherokee Indians have lost more than half of their original land. Mooney’s map shows that Native Americans lack economic rights because they did not have the right to their land. Throughout the 1800s, Natives have had their land taken by unfair treaties and by Indian Removal acts. This document was created shortly after the U.S. government took the last of Cherokee land.

Read More

Native Americans In The 19th Century

951 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout the 19th century Native Americans were treated far less than respectful by the United States’ government. This was the time when the United States wanted to expand and grow rapidly as a land, and to achieve this goal, the Native Americans were “pushed” westward. It was a memorable and tricky time in the Natives’ history, and the US government made many treatments with the Native Americans, making big changes on the Indian nation. Native Americans wanted to live peacefully with the white men, but the result of treatments and agreements was not quite peaceful. This precedent of mistreatment of minorities began with Andrew Jackson’s indian removal policies to the tribes of Oklahoma (specifically the Cherokee indians) in 1829 because of the lack of respect given to the indians during the removal laws.

Read More

More about Letter From Killers Of The Flower Moon By David Grann

Related Topics

Open Document