More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of the indian removal act today
Cons of the indian removal act of 1830
Cons of the indian removal act of 1830
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of the indian removal act today
The indian lands that were in amongst the states. People started to take some land in the Native territory and the native americans did not like that so they complained to the president. Instead of listening to them Jackson ignored them and people continued to take their land. Andrew then started to get a removal act passed. Despite that the Natives had the right to the land.
The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Indians land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their land in the states, but could not force them to leave. He violated and broke commitments that he even negotiated with them. He tried to bribe the Indians and even threatened some of them. Alfred Cave organizes his article thematically and is trying to prove
The tribes, Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chickasaw, and Seminole, had to evacuate their territory so their land could be traded which was unfair because they had no consent. President Jackson had fought the Indians in many wars and was a strong opponent to them. He felt that signing this act was a fair exchange of land, although the Indians had to move and give up their land. Determination; This made President
Shortly after, Jackson’s fortunes slightly improved after he inherited a small fortune from a distant relative in Ireland. Unfortunately, he squandered his fortune through gambling and to survive, he briefly taught as a school teacher. At the age of seventeen and with a restless spirit, a fiery temper and fearless, Jackson decided to pursue law. He joined prominent lawyers in Salisbury, North Carolina where he apprenticed in the art of law and in 1787 he was admitted to the bar and received his practicing license which allowed him to practice in numerous counties in North
Unit 1 Essay How would you feel if someone wanted to remove you from your home? You wouldn’t let that happen right, but what if i said that it was a law that if i wanted to take you and remove you, you had to leave? Well that’s probably how the Indians felt when Andrew Jackson made a speech to congress on “ Indian Removal “. This has a very big impact on our history today, it kinda reminds me of when white people didn’t want any African Americans around, but I am not gonna get into that subject. Now Andrew Jackson went to congress and gave a speech telling the congress we need to remove the indians so we can have room for our own living.
In fact the common man of the time—whether he was a powerful blueblood or a humble Christian—didn’t believe that the Native Americans should be able to keep their land for quite a few reasons. They felt that Native Americans were prohibiting the United States from truly expanding to its fullest potential not to mention they also felt threatened by the Natives being so close. So, Jackson signed into law the Indian Removal Act in 1830. However, there were American Indians that refused to leave their home lands for the lands promised to them further west in what would now be Oklahoma. Eventually they were forcibly removed by American troops.
As the Indians now had land to live on, and didn’t have to worry about maintaining the land as much. The way the Indians were able to have land was because they lived on reservations. Reservations, were controversial, but they did give pretty stable land to the Indians. On the topic of reservations, Bennett Elmer said, “The 1851 Indian Appropriation Acts allocated funds to move Western tribes onto reservations.”
The Indians believed that since they were a part of the United States they should be entitled to protection under its laws, but since this was not working they were left with another choice, and decided to take action against the Indian Removal Act and Georgia. Being very cultured and knowledgeable in the ways of the white man and their laws they decided to use Georgia’s strategy of law against in a “fight fire with fire” sort of sense to join the Cherokee Nation in suing the state of Georgia in a case that would eventually go all the way to the Supreme Court. The Indians had also decided to insult to injury by hiring the former attorney general under Adams and Monroe, William Wirt. Jackson had showed his disdain of this action by commenting “The course of Wirt has truly been wicked” (Remini 242). This comment also shows the betrayal Jackson felt knowing that a fellow American was hindering the inevitable expansion of the United States and removal of the Indians.
The Supreme Court had decided that the Indians could live on the land; however, they could not hold a title to the land. This was because their “right to own their land” was inferior to the settler’s “right to discovery.” The Indian’s wanted to own their own land because it was theirs to begin with; therefore, they thought this decision was
During this time period, Native Americans were being treated so poorly. They were very misunderstood, and white men didn 't even try to understand them. All they cared about was forcing the Indians off of "their" land. This is unfair in so many ways. One being that the Natives were actually there first.
Congress basically gave permission to Jackson to offer tribes land west of the Mississippi River for their land east of the river. People thought this offer was indulgent, but the Native Americans wouldn’t give up their homes effortlessly. The government used unfair strategies to get tribes to agree with the offer. The Fox and Sauk tribes’ leader, Chief Black Hawk, was one of the governments first fool to fall into their trap. He refused to respect the treaty to give their land to the US, but agreed to move west of the Mississippi River to land in Iowa.
The land the people wanted was occupied and owned by Native American tribes. This prompted Jackson to pass the Indian Removal Act in 1830. This law allowed him to remove Native American tribes from their land and move them to “Indian Territory.” The topic of removal was not new to Jackson. He has been in campaigns against the Creeks and the Seminoles before.
At first, before the removal act, the natives continued to live peacefully alongside the immigrants. Soon though the americans wanted more and more land, money, and even slaves. So Americans offered money and other items of value to the native tribes in exchange for them to move far away from their homeland. If the tribes did not accept their offer the the americans took it upon themselves to forcefully take the land for themselves. The tribes that did accept money and other items waited years to receive their rightful payment.
The government tried to force assimilation on Native Americans as well as an attempt to “kill the indian, save the man.” These ideas and policies are similar to those popular during the presidency of Andrew Jackson. Jackson developed a sense of ‘paternalism’ towards indians and believed he was saving them by forcing them to live out west of the Mississippi river away from white culture. The difference was that Jackson did not believe in assimilation of indians into white culture, he believed they should be kept separate. With the help of the Federal government removing indians from land west of the Mississippi, Americans were
In 1829, when President Andrew Jackson took office, one of his main goals were to move the Native Americans to the west of the Mississippi River. Jackson's purpose for their movement was to give the white settlers the land that the Native's had resided on and Jackson also had a strong belief that a good Indian was a dead Indian. When the Native Americans were ordered to move, the Cherokees went to the Supreme Court to challenge the removal order. In the case of Worester vs. Georgia, the verdict stated that the Cherokees had the right to keep their land, but Jackson refused to recognize the Court's decision. Jackson's Native American policy resulted in the removal of the Cherokee from their homeland to settlements across the Mississippi River,
