ipl-logo

Summary Of Free Speech Follies By Berkley Fish

566 Words3 Pages

Stanley Fish, the author of Free- Speech Follies, is a well renowned scholar, who has written many pieces about campus politics and academic careers. Fish has taught at some of the most elite colleges in the country, which include: Berkley, John Hopkins College, and Duke. For five years he was the dean of Liberal Arts and Sciences at Illinois University. At the age of seventy-five he joined the Cardoza Law School in New York City as a Floersheimer Visiting Professor. Some of the books he has written include: The Trouble with Principle, Save the World on Your Own Time and There’s No Such Thing as Free Speech… and It’s a Good Thing, Too.
Summary:
“In the academy, the case is even worse: Not only is the First Amendment pressed into service at the drop of a hat, it is invoked ritually when there are no First Amendment issues in sight” (2). …show more content…

Fish starts off by saying people will cry wolf whenever something does not go there way, but in this case they will call First Amendment. Fish uses the example of a newspaper on a college campus attacking a certain minority group in an article that they had published. When this first came out people were furious all over. However, when asked why they published this controversial article the editor responded with the newspaper has a voice and that they do not agree with this article in the first place. Fish then goes on to argue his point that everything the editor said was wrong, and then provides another example of where this happened. This time Fish argues that the First Amendment protects unpopular speeches or writings from having the government have its opinion. Fish explains that there is not an issue with the First Amendment, but rather than an issue with the editors not accepting the consequences of the

Show More
Related
1959 Words | 8 Pages

This case is also regularly cited in other Supreme Court cases and is often a deciding factor. It has been used in cases like Konigsberg v. State Bar “That view, which of course cannot be reconciled with the law relating to libel, slander, misrepresentation, obscenity, perjury, false advertising, solicitation of crime, complicity by encouragement, conspiracy, and the like, is said to be compelled by the fact that the commands of the First Amendment are stated in unqualified terms: "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble . . . . " But as Mr. Justice Holmes once said: "[T]he provisions of the Constitution are not mathematical formulas having their essence in their form; they are organic living institutions transplanted from English soil.

Read More
158 Words | 1 Pages

The way I think this quote relates to Long Long After School is that Wes,is almost like inspired by Miss Tretheway’s kindness towards him. The section that states, “the things we value” I believe that in the kind doing of Miss Tretheway’s actions, she really touched his life. Although in the text it never stated that he remained kind we can make an inference; since Wes visited her grave, this shows that she had some sort of impact in his life. “We set our goals and make our decisions” I suppose that throughout the years Wes established his goals and decisions on things that are good. So ”the things we value are the things which we set our goals and make our decisions” means, in relation to the text, is that Wes really valued Miss Tretheway

Read More
713 Words | 3 Pages

Furthermore the Court case is about a student who, as well as Alex, was forced to do the Pledge of Allegiance. According to the school, “refusal to salute was treated as ‘insubordination’ and was punishable by expulsion and charges of delinquency” (West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette). This is plainly obvious that this quote goes against the First Amendment Rights. It is shown that it’s not just the Upper Arlington School District that goes against students’

Read More
391 Words | 2 Pages

Smolla writes about the First Amendment in his essay, "Speech Overview". He discusses what freedom of speech is, why Americans hold the First Amendment in such high regard, and how it can be conflicting to many American's "social instincts". The main idea that Smolla is arguing is that Americans embrace freedom of speech and individuality, even though it may cause conflict. He recognizes that some limitations must exist, but the freedom to express our thoughts is the American way. Smolla points out that many controversial items are approved due to the first amendment, even though they conflict with patriotism.

Read More
1012 Words | 5 Pages

Censorship in America can vary between the silencing of young voices and the prevention of exposing others of inappropriate material. Many people are afraid of losing their freedom of speech, as first amendment rights should be mandatory for American citizens. Polar to this argument insists the importance of censorship, as it can shield the public from information that can lead to fear or chaos. Leaving students ignorant to world problems, however, is argued by Sonja West that it removes their first amendment rights and creates a future working-class of Americans who are clouded from the truth. West is a law professor at the University of Georgia who is distinguished for her expertise in the first amendment law and minor in journalism.

Read More
103 Words | 1 Pages

People have the tendency to take the First Amendment for granted, but some tend to use it to their favor. Stanley Fish presents his main argument about how people misuse this amendment for all their conflicts involving from racial issues to current political affairs in his article, Free-Speech Follies. His article involves those who misinterpret the First Amendment as their own works or constantly use it as an excuse to express their attitudes and desires about a certain subject matter. He expresses his personal opinions against those who consistently use the First Amendment as a weapon to defend themselves from harm of criticism.

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

The first amendment states that “Congress cannot enact laws limiting ”the freedom of speech or press.”’ (Kentucky Resolutions) Again, in short, this amendment is saying that the federal government is not able to pass a law that takes away someone’s right to speak their opinion. Contrary to this amendment, the Federal government did exactly the opposite of what the amendment said was allowed. The acts, passed by John Adams, take away the human right of speaking what is on the mind and using what they say to show them off as a threat.

Read More
1195 Words | 5 Pages

In the text, “A Cheerleader’s Vulgar Message” the author, Adam Liptak, the Supreme Court correspondent for The New York Times, argues that the court case Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. The Supreme Court involving a 9th grade student in Pennsylvania that didn't make the varsity cheer squad and posted vulgar language with her friend on social media to show her frustration and getting punished for a whole year from cheer was a controversial topic and presents both sides. Liptak shows one side of the argument by stating, “The court said the First Amendment did not allow public schools to punish students for speech outside school grounds.” This helps to prove the author's claim that this was a controversial topic because he is stating what the court's response to the case was and that this is also improving his credibility because he uses the First Amendment to show why the court thinks the school was in the wrong for the students'

Read More
337 Words | 2 Pages

This case highlighted the First Amendment condemning any limit on free speech. However, during the case proceeding, the Court had dissents for deciding when the government may restrict the First Amendment. The case spread the fact that

Read More
453 Words | 2 Pages

The Baron’s acceptance speech brings us to the question Lincoln Caplan, senior researcher scholar at Yale Law School about Holmes’s interpretation of the First Amendment. Should we protect freedoms of speech even though we loathe it? Should journalist protect freedoms of press in journalism even though they feel be frightened by threats from the president? The First Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the

Read More
2495 Words | 10 Pages

It further postulates that such commentary on public figures is not only legal, but also healthy — implicitly making the argument that Free Speech is an essential feature of participation in democracy, and that public figures must bow to such caricatures in exchange for the power that society has bestowed upon them. It summarises this belief with a quote taken directly from the Hustler v. Falwell judgement: "At the heart of the First Amendment is the recognition of the fundamental importance of the free flow of ideas. Freedom to speak one 's mind is not only an aspect of individual liberty, but essential to the quest for truth and the vitality of society as a whole. In the world of debate about public affairs many things done with motives that are less than admirable are nonetheless protected by the First

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

Censorship of The First Amendment This paper will discuss how censorship denies citizens of the United States our full rights as delineated in the First Amendment. It will outline how and why the first amendment was created and included in the Constitution of the United States of America. This paper will also define censorship, discuss a select few legal cases surrounding freedom of speech and censorship as well as provide national and local examples of censorship.

Read More
1197 Words | 5 Pages

The Supreme Court has been entrusted with the task of interpreting the Constitution of the United States. In the First Amendment of the Constitution, freedom of speech serves as the foundational liberty which is the cornerstone to the practice of democracy. Commencing at the early part of the twentieth century cases such as Schenck v. United States, Debs v. United States, Abrams v United States, Whitney v. California, and Dennis v. United States, paved the way for the Court to set the legal standard for defining protected and unprotected speech. Nonetheless, the Court has struggled to interpret said boundaries property and has failed to protect speech in some of the above cases. This essay will analyze two different scenarios where the Court

Read More
64 Words | 1 Pages

Gavin Bissell 5th Hour 1-15-16 Intro: I support free speech uncensored. II. What is free speech?

Read More
261 Words | 2 Pages

David confessed that he was terrified of going into an environment that he was not familiar with and tried to prepare himself by reading a few readers that would help him. David explained how he believed that free speech is a win win, that you can improve and also can sharpen your can sharpen your own mind. Because of the fact that he was a conservative and there weren’t many conservatives

Read More

More about Summary Of Free Speech Follies By Berkley Fish

Related Topics

Open Document