May it Please the Court, The Court case Alex v. Upper Arlington School District, a student named Alex refused to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance in the early hours of school. He was told countless times by teachers to stand for the flag. Alex refused and was sent to the office and received a suspension for insubordination. This action violated Alex’s First Amendment rights, going against his freedom of speech and religion. The First Amendment rights of Alex were violated because the school went against his belief of religion and did not allow him to express it. The school administrator tampered with Alex’s First Amendment rights. Quoting from the Bill of Rights, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or …show more content…
Quoting the Upper Arlington Student Handbook “It is the policy of the Upper Arlington School District not to discriminate, in violation of federal or state law, on the basis of race, color, national origin, ancestry, religion, age, sex or disability in admission to, access to, treatment in or employment in, any service, program, or activity sponsored by the Upper Arlington City Schools” (Upper Arlington Schools Students’ Handbook 4). The District itself went against its own rules that they have created. It is clearly stated above in the handbook that the school district does not discriminate on the basis of …show more content…
Furthermore the Court case is about a student who, as well as Alex, was forced to do the Pledge of Allegiance. According to the school, “refusal to salute was treated as ‘insubordination’ and was punishable by expulsion and charges of delinquency” (West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette). This is plainly obvious that this quote goes against the First Amendment Rights. It is shown that it’s not just the Upper Arlington School District that goes against students’