ipl-logo

Violation Of The First Amendment In Schools Essay

472 Words2 Pages

In January 1942, the West Virginia Board of Education adopted a resolution to enforce every student and teacher to a pledge of allegiances of the nation’s flag. If anyone refused to honor the flag he or she would be found “insubordinate” and expelled from school. The Barnett sisters were Jehovah’s Witnesses who refused to pledge of allegiances while in public school. Their father would not allow them to salute the flag. Because it violated their religious of the garden image that the only thing to be worshiped was God. Barnette brought suit in the Supreme Court. In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court overruled its decision Minersville School District vs Gobitis and held that it is unconstitutional. Denial of the First Amendment and the Fourteenth …show more content…

Jackson wrote the majority opinion, the Supreme Court held that unconstitutional and a violation of the First Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment. Under the First Amendment, the government cannot enforce laws on an individual’s will regarding of religious liberty. As long as the actions do not present a clear and present danger. The school district had clearly violated the student rights by forcing the student to salute the flag and pledge of allegiances. Jackson reasoned that by forcing the student to salute the flag it was a sign of communicated an expression of set idea. Whereby, making the resolutions as a requirement the states had violated the constitution.
For years, the Witnesses did not seek in an equal religious liberty. The Witnesses believed in the law of God and they only worshiped God. Not man’s law nor the resolution. They consider the flag is an image and it violated their belief of graven image. For this reason, they refuse to salute the flag.
This court case has a dramatic impact on the Jehovah’s Witnesses regarding religious liberty under the First and Fourteenth Amendment. In a 6-3 decision, the court overruled its decision Minersville School District vs Gobitis (8-1). These two court cases are very similar but the outcomes of the case were opposite. This case changes the restraints enforcement against Jehovah’s Witnesses and declared the statement that it is constitutional to not salute the flag under state

Show More
Related
231 Words | 1 Pages

The plaintiff’s argument was that the student’s suspension was unconstitutional and the confederate flag is a part of his heritage. The district court ruled the school’s dress code policy unconstitutionally

Read More
1138 Words | 5 Pages

While in the Court of Appeals, Phelps’s argument was that the First Amendment protected their judgment. Court of Appeals agreed to Westboro’s primary argument that the church was entitled to judgment as a matter of law because the First Amendment protects Westboro’s speech. The Court says the picket signs were also protected under the First Amendment, because the statements deal with public concern. The jury could not find Westboro

Read More
578 Words | 3 Pages

Abington SD vs. Schempp This case concerns Bible reading in the public schools of Pennsylvania. When the students who attended arrived for school, they were required to read at least ten verses from the Bible. After that, they were required to recite the Lord’s Prayer. The only way to avoid these activities was written note from the parents. The United States Supreme Court favored Schempp and declared this Bible reading to be unconstitutional.

Read More
1170 Words | 5 Pages

Notаbly absent from the opinion, as it was in Plessy, is any citаtion to a Supreme Court cаse that considered whether the prаctice of segregating schools was a violation of the Fourteenth Аmendment. It was an open question for the Court. The Court аdmitted that the precedent to which it cited involved discriminаtion between whites and blacks rаther thаn other rаces. However, the Court found no аppreciable difference here—"the decision is within the discretion of the state in regulating its public schools, and does not conflict with the Fourteenth Аmendment."

Read More
1682 Words | 7 Pages

Douglas and the other five of them supported Engel and the parents because they agreed that the First Amendment and the Establishment Clause were being violated; even if students were excused from performing the prayer. Most of the court also believed that“not every religion recognizes a God, so some are necessarily excluded even with this wording” (Skelton 1). In a national survey by the Nation’s School journal, it was found that “...50 percent of school administrators returning the questionnaire wanted the Engel decision reversed ; 48 percent of them supported it” (Dierenfield

Read More
599 Words | 3 Pages

Case Citation: Santa Fe Independent School Dist. v. Doe, 530 U.S. 290 (2000) Parties: Santa Fe Independent School District/ Petitioner Jane Doe/ Respondent Facts: Prior to 1995, Santa Fe High School established a policy which allows their student council chaplain to deliver a Christian prayer through the school’s public address system before home football games of the school’s team. The practice was repeated before every football game. The mothers of one Mormon and one Catholic student filed a suit, claiming that the prayer policy violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

Read More
426 Words | 2 Pages

The issue in this case was whether school-sponsored nondenominational prayer in public schools violates the Establishment clause of the first amendment (Facts and Case Summary - Engel v. Vitale, n.d.). This case dealt with a New York state law that had required public schools to open each day with the Pledge of Allegiance and a nondenominational prayer in which the students recognized their dependence upon God (Facts and Case Summary - Engel v. Vitale, n.d.). This law had also allowed students to absent themselves from this activity if they found that it was objectionable. There was a parent that sued the school on behalf of their child. Their argument was that the law violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, as made applicable

Read More
2035 Words | 9 Pages

On June 25, 1962 the Supreme Court voted 6-1 in favor of Engel that the Regents Prayer violated the First Amendment clause. Writing for the majority, Justice Hugo Black stated, “it is no part of the business of government to compose official prayers” and also explaining how the prayer breaks the “constitutional wall of separation between Church and State” There is no doubt that the school's prayer was a religious act led by teachers in a public school, however there was a lot of negative backlash in response to the court's decision. Many US citizens were outraged by the decision. Although William Vitale, the board president from New York, supported the prayer, he claimed the board would follow the court's decision either way.

Read More
650 Words | 3 Pages

On June 25, 1962, a Supreme Court case, Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421, was decided. The lawsuit was brought to the United States Supreme Court by parents (of students who attended schools in the Herricks School District) who complained that a nondenominational prayer instituted by the New York Board of Regents in their district was unconstitutional. The parents argued that the prayer, although optional, violated their First Amendment Rights. When the 6-1 (two justices did not vote) decision was made, it was ruled that voluntary prayer in public schools violates the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. One concurring opinion was given, and the single judge that did not vote the same as the rest provided

Read More
372 Words | 2 Pages

By the 1930s, the  Nazi began arresting  of Jehovah's Witnesses who refused to salute their flag and sent them to concentration camps. Jehovah's Witnesses value that the the law of God is more valuable  than laws made by government. “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath”. They consider the flag is an 'image' . because of this reason, they refused to salute the flag.

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

Censorship of The First Amendment This paper will discuss how censorship denies citizens of the United States our full rights as delineated in the First Amendment. It will outline how and why the first amendment was created and included in the Constitution of the United States of America. This paper will also define censorship, discuss a select few legal cases surrounding freedom of speech and censorship as well as provide national and local examples of censorship.

Read More
520 Words | 3 Pages

The law in Texas at the time banned flag burnings. He was convicted, and the case was appealed to the Supreme Court. We ruled that Johnson’s right to free speech had been violated. He was expressing symbolic speech. We ruled that even though an opinion is unpopular, doesn’t mean we have the right to restrict his freedom of

Read More
538 Words | 3 Pages

First in the court case “Texas V. Johnson majority opinion” they stated that the people had the right to burn the flags due to the first amendment protecting them even if offended. For example they quoted “the way to preserve the flags special role is to not punish those who feel different it’s to persuade them that they are wrong”(lines 30-36). Furthermore “our decision is a reaffirmation of the principles of freedom and inclusiveness that the flag best reflects” (lines 27-29). So these quotes tell’s me that the courts tone is precise and that they are sure about their

Read More
1250 Words | 5 Pages

If the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation can push aside the clearly specified guaranteed rights and freedoms of their citizens, the possibility of the same unjust restrictions being taken against other religions in that country is quite likely, furthermore, the possibility of similar exploitation happening in this country is not as farfetched an idea as some may scoff. The claim states that Jehovah’s Witnesses are dangerous extremists equal to Al-Qaida, ISIS, and the Taliban. The United Nations, the Helsinki Commission, the European Court of Human Rights and numerous other international organizations have spoken out against the court’s decision to misapply laws and label Jehovah’s Witnesses in such a manner, yet their appeals seem to have fallen on deaf ears (Hope,

Read More
595 Words | 3 Pages

Cornell University stated in an article, “Johnson was convicted of desertion of a venerated object in violation of Texas statute.” Johnson's actions were protected by the First Amendment so he was not sent to prison as stated in the United States Supreme Court case Texas v Johnson. His actions against the flag should have been more severe. Since Johnson’s actions were not threatening the branches of peace, there was no threat in the moment. “... and since the

Read More

More about Violation Of The First Amendment In Schools Essay

Related Topics

Open Document