Nicholas Carr "Is Google Making Us Stupid," describes the results of using Google makes people less critical thinks. At first he finds the internet as a wonderful place for writers and such for the ability to search for certain material quickly. Yet after some time he finds that he is unable to read long articles without simply skimming them. He discusses this with his friends his predicament, and finds his friends and such have the same predicament.
In Nicholas Carr’s article called “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, Carr talks about the many issues he believes are stemming from using online search engines and Google in general. This article was written back in 2016 and published into The Norton Field Guide to Writing with Readings. Carr discusses his view on the whole idea of online readings and most of the information available to the world being viewed online through a search engine like Google. He also goes into thorough detail explaining how he believes that technology is becoming more advanced and smarter than its creators. In Carr’s article, he will explain all that he believes is wrong with technology in today’s society and how dumbed down it has made us.
In, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” (2008), Nicholas Carr maintains that the advent of the Internet produced a shallow generation of information consumers who lack the ability to deeply engage with a text and think critically about it. Carr supports his claim by drawing on numerous personal and historical anecdotes and one scientific study. The purpose of Carr’s article is to open dialogue about the potentially adverse effects the Internet could have human cognitive processes to allow individuals to begin to question the impact that the Internet is having on their lives. Carr establishes an informal, causal relationship with the audience. The audience of The Atlantic is generally well-educated, upper-middle class individuals who are likely approaching the article with a relaxed, non-critical lens (most likely embracing the article as a form of “think piece”).
In his article, Is Google Making Us Stupid?, the author Nicholas Carr describes the many ways the use of search engines have on our comprehension. He writes, “The more they use the Web , the more they have to fight to focused on long pieces of writing”(Carr). Most people who often searched the Web, limit themselves from actually learning. For example, googling questions to find answers quicker than actually reading the text limits one's knowledge. Maryanne Wolf, a Tufts University cognitive neuroscientist also stated that search engines is affecting the way we read and write.
Analytical Review of “Is Google Making Us Stupid” As society advances into the technological era, innovations have served society as a catalyst to become more efficient, more technologically sound, and most importantly more in tuned with the rapid changes that are presented to us every day. Yet, there are some, that like to stay “old school.” There are some arguments that state these technological advancements are receding society’s intellectual advancement. Nonetheless, it should be apparent that the subject on society’s advancement has many view points and approaches. In “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, Nicholas Carr approaches the common issues of common availability of information through the internet; most importantly how it effects our ability to search and retain information.
In his writing originally published in the Atlantic “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, Nicholas Carr demonstrates that our increased internet usage is impeding our ability to concentrate and read deeply. Carr begins his writing by bringing in a reference from the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey which highlights the contrast between a cold human and a computer who is able to feel its mind going. Similar to the computer, the author can feel a change in his mind because he is no longer able to read deeply; a skill that used to come easily to him. Another thing that has changed in the past few years is his internet usage.
Nicholas Carr wrote a short essay entitled “Is google making us stupid?”. The essay explains on how Carr believes how the web and search engines are effecting him and people every day. Carr explains that the web is making people lose focus a lot quicker because they are used to convince and can not handle more than a couple pages of an essay. Also, Google is starting to work as an artificial intelligence for the average human brain,and how the owners were hoping for an artificial brain to do all their thinking for them. The world wide web and various search engines are doing more damage than good for the people using it .The
In “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” published in The Atlantic on July 2008, American writer Nicholas Carr comes to the realization that the constant usage of the internet is changing how the average person reads and remembers. Carr says: “The Web has been a godsend to me as a writer. Research that once required days in the stacks or periodical rooms of libraries can now be done in minutes”. Nicholas Carr believes that the internet is a valuable tool, but there are concerns based on how it is used. The author thinks that this can be seen in the fact that people are more likely to skim an article to try and get the information wanted, causing an easy and lazy way of achieving the wanted information.
Macy Sadler Mrs. Woodward APEL: Period 4 5 February 2017 Quality Non-Fiction and the Internet How often do you log on, scroll through, post, or “like” something on the internet and is that time used on the Web interfering with your cognitive abilities? Do credibility and sentence style make Nicholas Carr’s article a reliable source to reference and believe? Carr’s article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, is full of irony, persona, and concrete examples all to help the reader understand or even change their outlook on the internet and how it affects our daily lives. Nicholas Carr is an American non-fiction writer who was a finalist for the 2011 Pulitzer Prize, and was awarded the Neil Postman Award for Career Achievement in Public Intellectual
As the reader, you can tell that Nicholas Carr is looking at the bigger picture. He is thinking about how this will affect us in the future, and does more than just talk about why Google is making us stupid. He goes back and gives examples of other devices that have had the same effect on many different generations. This makes us wonder, how can we use technology to better ourselves, without letting it control us? Because we rely on computers to mediate our understanding of the world, Carr leaves it up to us; the audience.
In his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid? ” , Nicholas Carr talks about how the internet has affected the way most people process the information that they could found online. The title of the article is the most obvious clue for the argument that he is trying to make. He also points out how internet is our primary source to find the information that we are looking for, but the side effect is affecting our basic ability to read long pieces of information such as books. Google is a well-known website that allows to anyone instant access to kind of information, which can be really helpful if the user knows how to use and manipulate it.
Nicholas Carr composed an article for The Atlantic titled "Is Google Making Us Stupid". In his article Carr makes a dispute that reading online is less arouse then perusing books. In this paper I will concentrate on the different clams that Carr uses
Rhetorical Analysis In the article “Is Google Making us Stupid?”, author Nicholas Carr expresses his idea that the internet is taking over society and our thinking process. Google is affecting our abilities to read books, longer articles, and even older writings. Carr believes that we have become so accustomed to the ways of the internet, and we are relying on Google 's ability to sort through the details for us so we don 't have to, in order to get the information we find necessary more efficiently. He finds that this process has become almost too handy, and that it is corrupting us from becoming better educated.
He tries the explain the natural development of technology and how it is leading us to artificial intelligence, but in doing this he does not add into in his argument. The objective of companies like Google attempting to supplement our intelligence with artificial intelligence does not have any measurable outcome in the real world. The counterargument is trying to take something that he believes may happen in the future vs. something that he has explained to be experienced over time. While it is possible that he is trying to warn about the future to this problem, this argument does not supplement his argument that we are losing our attention span when it comes to long readings online. Carr is only deviated from what he is trying to convince the reader, and this only adds to the tangled mess that his arguments are in
Carr points out that people are getting lazy and relying on shortcuts. Another viewpoint he mentioned is the internet and how the machine are designed for searching programs, and finding what interest people. This creation of the internet was to create information for people to access. Carr believes that Google and other search engines are trying to replace the human brain, and the way we think.
